RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effect of Finishing Time on Microleakage at the Composite-Repair Interface
Fereshteh Shafieia, Nazanin Berahmanb, *, Elmira Niazic
Article Information
Identifiers and Pagination:
Year: 2016Volume: 10
First Page: 497
Last Page: 504
Publisher ID: TODENTJ-10-497
DOI: 10.2174/1874210601610010497
Article History:
Received Date: 31/12/2014Revision Received Date: 12/07/2016
Acceptance Date: 10/08/2016
Electronic publication date: 23/09/2016
open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background:
Repair is a conservative treatment of defective composite restoration. Sealing the repair interface is a critical factor to achieve successful repaired restorations.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluatethe effect of three finishing times on the microleakage at the composite-repair interface.
Method:
Eighty composite specimens (Z250) were made and aged for eight weeks in water. They were randomly divided into four groups. In the control group, repairing was done with no surface treatment and using bonding agent. In groups 2 to 4, the specimens were repaired following roughening, etching and use of Adper Single Bond, and finished immediately, after 20 minutes and after 24 hours, respectively. After thermocycling, the microleakage at the repair interface was assessed using dye-penetration technique. The results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (α=0.05).
Results:
There was a significant difference among the four groups (P<0.001). The control group with the highest leakage showed a significant difference with the other groups (P<0.05). Immediate finishing showed a significantly higher leakage compared to 20-minute and 24-hour delayed finishing time (P<0.001). The two latter groups had no difference.
Conclusion:
Immediate finishing of the repaired restorations negatively affect the sealing at the repair interface, while 20-minute and 24-hour delayed finishing had no adverse effect on the interface sealing.
