RESEARCH ARTICLE


Microcomputed Tomography Analysis of Mesiobuccal Orifices and Major Apical Foramen in First Maxillary Molars



Gianrico Spagnuolo 1, *, #, Gianluca Ametrano 1, #, Vincenzo D’Antò 1, Anna Formisano 1, Michele Simeone 1, Francesco Riccitiello 1, Massimo Amato 2, Sandro Rengo 1
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II,” Napoli, Italy
2 Medical School, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 4799
Abstract HTML Views: 1621
PDF Downloads: 352
Total Views/Downloads: 6772
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1492
Abstract HTML Views: 835
PDF Downloads: 242
Total Views/Downloads: 2569



Creative Commons License
© Spagnuolo et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Oral and Max-illofacial Sciences, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Napoli, Italy; Tel/Fax: +390817462080; E-mail: gspagnuo@unina.it
# The first two authors equally contributed to the work.


Abstract

Objective:

Aim of the study was to determined by microcomputed tomography (µCT) the horizontal distance between the main (MB1) and the second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) orifices, the vertical distance between the MB1 and MB2 orifices planes, and the distance between the anatomic apex and major apical foramen (AF). Furthermore, we characterized the entire internal and external anatomy of the MB, distalbuccal (DB) and palatal (P) maxillary first molars roots.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty-two intact extracted first maxillary molars were scanned by X-ray computed transaxial µCT and then 2D and 3D images were processed and analyzed.

Results:

The results showed that 77.27% of the mesiobuccal (MB) roots presented a second MB canal, and 29.41% of the MB2 were independent from the MB1 canals. In 15 teeth, there were three root canal orifices on the chamber floor, and 10 of these teeth presented MB2 canals. The mean vertical distance between the MB1 and MB2 planes was 1.68 ± 0.83 mm. Seven teeth had four orifices. The mean horizontal interorificial distance between the MB1 and MB2 orifices was 1.21 ± 0.5 mm. Accessory canals were observed in 33.33% of the roots, loops in 6.06%, while isthmuses were found in 15 of the 22 MB roots. Of the total roots, 74.24% presented one foramen, while all of the roots showed a major apical foramen that was not coincident with the anatomic apex.

Conclusions:

Our µCT analysis provided interesting features on the horizontal and vertical distance between the MB1 and MB2 orifices and on the distance of AF and anatomic apex.

Clinical Relevance:

These results have an important clinical value because might support the endodontist in the recruitment, negotiation and obturation of maxillary first molar canal system.

Keywords: First maxillary molar, anatomy, MB2, µCT.