Dental Amalgam from the Past to the Present: Utilization among Ministry of Health Dental Clinics in the Makkah Region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dental Amalgam from the Past to the Present: Utilization among Ministry of Health Dental Clinics in the Makkah Region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

The Open Dentistry Journal 05 Oct 2023 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/18742106-v17-e231003-2023-72

Abstract

Background:

Amalgam fillings were invented and introduced to dentistry in France and England during the 1800s. It has since become one of the most reliable dental filling materials to treat dental caries. Dental amalgam contains approximately 50% elemental mercury, a source of occupational exposure among dental personnel and non-occupational exposure among patients.

Objective:

This study describes the use of dental amalgam in Makkah region dental clinics as a direct restorative material compared to composite and glass ionomer cement.

Methods:

This longitudinal retrospective study included 335 dental clinics in Makkah and Jeddah, the two largest cities in the Makkah region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Annual statistical data were obtained from the Directorate of Dentistry, Makkah and Jeddah Health Affairs, Ministry of Health. Data related to the restorative materials used (composite, glass ionomer cement (GIC), and amalgam) were counted for 11 years starting from 2009 to 2019 for Makkah city, and the restorative materials used (composite, GIC, and amalgam) from 2018 to the first quarter of 2021 for Jeddah city.

Results:

There was a slight increase in the number of amalgam restorations in Makkah from 2009 (37.15%) to 2011 (43.52%), followed by a gradual decrease until 2019 (1.39%). In Jeddah, there was a slight increase in amalgam restorations from 2018 (9.39%) to 2019 (11.03%). However, the use of amalgam restorations reduced sharply in 2020 (3.27%) and in the first quarter of 2021 (3.53%).

Conclusion:

There is a recognizable decreased trend in amalgam utilization in the Makkah region. Amalgam use is being phased down despite the lack of official regulation on its use.

Keywords: Phasedown, Minamata agreement, Minamata, Clinical dentistry, Restorative dentistry, Amalgam filling, Dental amalgam, Amalgam.

1. INTRODUCTION

Amalgam fillings were invented and introduced to dentistry in France and England during the 1800s [1]. Amalgam has become one of the most reliable dental filling materials to treat dental caries [2]. Powdered silver, tin, and copper are combined with metallic mercury (liquid mercury, quicksilver) to produce the dental amalgam within the dental clinic. It is estimated that more than one billion dental amalgam fillings were placed between 1988 and 2008 in the United States alone [3].

Mercury (Hg) is a known toxic substance found in nature. Many people may have been exposed to elemental mercury (Hg0), inorganic mercury (Hg2+), and organic methylmercury (MeHg). Dental amalgam contains approximately 50% elemental mercury. Mercury from dental amalgam can be released into the environment in various ways, such as from improper dental waste management practices and crematoria. Elemental mercury from dental amalgam and other sources of inorganic mercury contaminate air, land, and groundwater and can be biomagnified throughout the food chain as methylmercury [4]. The transformation of inorganic mercury pollution into methylmercury has been proven scientifically [5].

Studies have examined the neurological outcomes likely to be caused by mercury toxicity, such as Minamata disease, which resulted from environmental pollution by inorganic mercury and its subsequent transformation to methylmercury through the food chain [6-10]. Methylmercury is a potent neurotoxin that can cause physiological, neurological, behavioral, and reproductive harm to fish and wildlife [11].

During the twentieth century, the health hazards of mercury in dental amalgam were debated. In 1989, Clarkson claimed that occupational exposure to dental amalgam among dental personnel and non-occupational exposure among patients was a serious threat because it may lead to neurological disorders (e.g., erethism) [12]. Debate increased during the 1990s for three key reasons. First, many publications demonstrated the adverse effects of dental amalgam on the human body’s physiological processes. Second, public awareness of potential mercuric poisoning increased. Finally, advances in analytical chemistry led to the effective detection of systemic mercury at very low levels [4, 5]. However, the hazardous effects of dental amalgam restorations on human health were based on risk estimation rather than true causality [13].

The Minamata Convention on Mercury, or “Minamata Convention” (named after Minamata, Japan—the location of the worst-ever case of mercury pollution), was signed in October 2013 [14]. Its goal is to protect human health and the environment from mercury and mercury compounds throughout mercury’s life cycle, including the “phasedown of dental amalgam use.” This agreement entered into force on 16 August 2017. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia joined the Minamata Convention in February 2019, and the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) announced its plan would take effect in January 2020 [15].

This study examined amalgam utilization among dentists in the Ministry of Health (MOH) in the Makkah region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, since 2009. The findings of this study could serve as the foundation for future comparisons.

Table 1.
Summary of the dental clinics’ types, distribution, and number.
City Type Name of theDental Clinic Number of Dental Clinics Total
Makkah Specialized DentalCenters Alnoor 28 133
King Abdulaziz 18
King Faisal 10
Primary HealthcareCenters Aljamum Health Sector 12
Khulais Health Sector 11
Alkamel Health Sector 10
Makkah Praimary HealthCare Centers 37
Hospitals Khulais 2
Hera 4
Alkamel 1
King abdulaziz hospital 3
Public health Primary healthcarecenters 84
Jeddah Specialized DentalCenters King Fahad Hospital 43 202
Althaghr Hospital 8
Specialized Dentalcenter 40
PrimaryHealthcare Centers King Fahad Sector 23
Althaghr Sector 8
King Abdullah Sector 12
East Jeddah Sector 14
King Abdulaziz Sector 11
Adham Sector 4
Al-llith Sector 10
Rabegh Sector 9
Hospitals East Jeddah Hospital 5
King Abdullah 4
King Abdulaziz 3
Adham 2
Al-llith 2
Rabegh 4
Total 335

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

This longitudinal retrospective study focused on the Makkah region in the western area of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which contains 335 dental clinics in two large cities: Makkah and Jeddah. Of the 335 dental clinics, 133 were in Makkah, and 202 were in Jeddah (Table 1). The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board – Jeddah, MOH (approval number: A01148). Annual statistical data for the two cities were mostly obtained from the Directorate of Dentistry, Makkah and Jeddah Health Affairs, while others were collected directly from the clinics. Data related to the restorative materials used (composite, glass ionomer cement (GIC), and amalgam) were collected for 11 years starting from 2009 to 2019 for Makkah city, and the restorative materials used (composite, GIC, and amalgam) from 2018 to the first quarter of 2021 for Jeddah city. There were incomplete records for Makkah from 2020 to 2021 and Jeddah from 2009 to 2017. This missing data was not available in their records and could not be obtained by any means. The data were summarized and used for descriptive trending comparisons.

3. RESULTS

The total records were 25,343, in which the type of permanent restorations applied in Makkah from 2009 to 2019 and in Jeddah from 2018 to the first quarter of 2021 analyzed. Furthermore, data on permanent restorations in Makkah and Jeddah in 2018 and 2019 were compared.

3.1. Makkah

Restoration records for Makkah showed 268,651 restorations were applied in dental clinics in all primary healthcare centers and hospitals between 2009 and 2019. Amalgam was used in 56,690 (21.10%) restorations, and composite and GIC were used in 211,961 restorations (78.90%) (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Fig. (1) shows a slight increase from 2009 to 2011 in the use of amalgam restorations, followed by a gradual decrease in the utilization rate from 2011 to 2019.

Table 2.
Permanent restorations in Makkah (2009–2019).
Year Amalgam Composite & GIC Total
n % n % N
2009 9,347 37.15% 15,813 62.85% 25,160
2010 8,492 37.05% 14,426 62.95% 22,918
2011 9,526 43.52% 12,364 56.48% 21,890
2012 10,789 35.00% 20,036 65.00% 30,825
2013 7,083 22.63% 24,216 77.37% 31,299
2014 2,868 15.71% 15,384 84.29% 18,252
2015 2,340 12.95% 15,731 87.05% 18,071
2016 2,774 13.55% 17,701 86.45% 20,475
2017 2,205 10.40% 19,006 89.60% 21,211
2018 817 3.11% 25,412 96.89% 26,229
2019 449 1.39% 31,872 98.61% 32,321
Total 56,690 21.10% 211,961 78.90% 268,651
Abbreviation: GIC: glass ionomer cement.
Fig. (1). Percentage of permanent restorations in Makkah (2009–2019).
Table 3.
Permanent restorations in Jeddah (2018 to first quarter 2021).
Year Amalgam Composite% GIC% Total
n % n % n % N
2018 1,837 9.39% 12,561 64.18% 5,172 26.43% 19,570
2019 2,554 11.03% 15,256 65.90% 5,340 23.07% 23,150
2020 311 3.27% 5,925 62.25% 3,282 34.48% 9,518
2021 236 3.53% 4,183 62.64% 2,259 33.83% 6,678
Total 4,938 8.38% 37,925 64.37% 16,053 27.25% 58,916
Abbreviation: GIC: glass ionomer cement.
Fig. (2). Percentage of permanent restorations in Jeddah (2018 to first quarter 2021).

3.2. Jeddah

Permeant restoration records for Jeddah were only available from 2018 to the first quarter of 2021. During this period, 58,916 restorations were applied in 12 dental clinics and hospitals (no data were available for primary health care centers). Among the 58,196 restorations, 4,938 (8.38%) were amalgam restorations, 37,925 (64.37%) were composite restorations, and 16,053 (27.25%) were GIC restorations (Table 3).

As shown in Fig. (2), there was a slight increase in the utilization of amalgam from 2018 (9.39%) to 2019 (11.03%). However, the percentage reduced sharply in 2020 (3.27%) and in the first quarter of 2021 (3.53%). Regarding composite restorations, the utilization rate did not vary dramatically in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively. Conversely, GIC had similar utilization rates in 2018 (26.43%) and 2019 (23.07%), but the rate increased in 2020 (34.48%) and the first quarter of 2021 (33.83%).

3.3. Utilization Rate between Makkah and Jeddah (2018–2019)

Data were available to compare the permanent restoration utilization rates in Makkah and Jeddah (Table 4). Amalgam use was lower in Makkah and reduced over time (3.11% in 2018 versus 1.39% in 2019), while Jeddah showed a high and increased usage of amalgam restorations over time (9.39% in 2018 versus 11.03% in 2019).

Table 4.
Permanent restorations by type for Makkah and Jeddah (2018–2019).
Year Amalgam Composite & GIC
Makkah Jeddah Makkah Jeddah
2018 817 (3.11%) 1,837 (9.39%) 25,412 (96.89%) 25,412 (90.61%)
2019 449 (1.39%) 2,554 (11.03%) 31,872 (98.61%) 31,872 (88.97%)
Abbreviation: GIC: glass ionomer cement.

4. DISCUSSION

This study described the utilization rate of amalgam according to available data in two cities in the Makkah region (Makkah and Jeddah) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The results showed a decrease in amalgam restoration in the Makkah region over the years.

The introduction of the Minamata Convention sought to implement a “phasedown of dental amalgam use.” However, even before the declaration of the agreement, the Swedish national parliament decided against supporting amalgam fillings via national dental insurance in 1999, significantly affecting the consumption of dental amalgam. In 2009, the Swedish government banned the import and use of dental amalgam, among other mercury-containing products. In 2011, Norway banned mercury-containing products and declared an amalgam-free dental practice [16].

Amalgam utilization rates in Makkah (1.93%) in 2019 and Jeddah (3.53%) in the first quarter of 2021 were surprisingly low. Even before the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia joined the Minamata Convention in 2019, the rate of amalgam use in Makkah was 10.40% in 2017, slightly higher than New Zealand (7.1%) [17]. However, a significant decrease in amalgam use was observed in Makkah (3.11%) in 2018 to levels lower than New Zealand’s for the previous year. The use of amalgam in New Zealand decreased from 52.3% in 1998 to 7.1% in 2017. Considering the early acceptance of the Minamata Convention by New Zealand in October 2013 [14], the current study’s results showed a rapid reduction in amalgam utilization within a few years [17]. On the other hand, Finland reported a total rate reduction of up to 3% in 2016 [15].

Multiple countries that have phased down the use of dental amalgam have shown significant early reductions; for example, Denmark reported only 5% of restorations used amalgam in 2013. Further, the Netherlands used amalgam in less than 1% of restorations in 2011 [15]. The utilization rates in the Netherlands were remarkably low compared to the results in the current study for the same year. Further, Hungary (12%) and Singapore (16%) revealed higher rates of amalgam restoration in 2012 than the previously mentioned countries [15] but lower than Makkah, which showed a 35% utilization rate in 2012.

5. LIMITATIONS

Though the collected data was enough to prescribe the trend of dental amalgam restoration utilization rates, the incomplete data records were unfortunate.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this study indicate a recognizable improvement in dental service providers’ awareness of amalgam restoration with decreased utilization rates. Amalgam use has being phased down despite the lack of official regulation. Further studies are needed to examine amalgam utilization in other regions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

GIC = Glass Ionomer Cement
SOM = Soil Organic Matter

ETHICAL STATEMENT

The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board–Jeddah, MOH (approval number: A01148).

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The summarized data are available upon request from the principal author. As mentioned in the Methods section, the data can be obtained from its source, which is the Directorate of Dentistry, Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Greener EH. Amalgam--yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Oper Dent 1979; 4(1): 24-35.
2
People H. Understanding and improving health. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services 2000.
3
Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Dental devices: Classification of dental amalgam, reclassification of dental mercury, designation of special controls for dental amalgam, mercury, and amalgam alloy. Final rule. Fed Regist 2009; 74(148): 38685-714.
4
Food U, Administration D. Epidemiological evidence on the adverse health effects reported in relation to mercury from dental amalgam. Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services 2019.
5
Sakamoto M, Tatsuta N, Izumo K, et al. Health impacts and biomarkers of prenatal exposure to methylmercury: Lessons from Minamata, Japan. Toxics 2018; 6(3): 45.
6
McALPINE DOUGLAS. Minamata Disease. AMA Arch Neurol 1959; 1(5): 522-30.
7
Miyakawa T, Deshimaru M, Sumiyoshi S, et al. Experimental organic mercury poisoning? Pathological changes in peripheral nerves. Acta Neuropathol 1970; 15(1): 45-55.
8
Nose K. Studies on the toxicity of low alkyl mercury compounds. Jpn J Hyg 1969; 24(3): 359-67.
9
Takeuchi T, Morikawa N, Matsumoto H, Shiraishi Y. A pathological study of Minamata disease in Japan. Acta Neuropathol 1962; 2(1): 40-57.
10
Kurland LT, Faro SN, Siedler H. Minamata disease. The outbreak of a neurologic disorder in Minamata, Japan, and its relationship to the ingestion of seafood contaminated by mercuric compounds. World Neurol 1960; 1(5): 370-95.
11
Arotiba GT, Loto AO, Ijarogbe O, et al. Lessons from mercury dental amalgam phase down for developing economies. Afr J Oral Health Sci 2019; 8(2)
12
Jesus LF, Moreira FR. <b>Impact of exposure to low levels of mercury on the health of dental workers. Acta Scientiarum Health Sciences 2016; 38(2): 219-29.
13
Luchowska A, Sroczyńska M, Żaczek A. Assessment of the impact of dental amalgam on human health: A literature review. J Educ Health Sport 2023; 13(3): 105-12.
14
Nations U. Minamata Convention on Mercury Kumamoto (Japan): Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Minamata Convention on Mercury held from 7 to 11 October 2013. 2017. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVII-17&chapter=27&clang=_en
15
Lessons from Countries Phasing Down Dental Amalgam Use 2016. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/31212
16
Yousefi H. Replacing dental amalgam by mercury-free restorative materials; it’s time to take action. Daru 2018; 26(1): 1-3.
17
Broadbent JM, Murray CM, Schwass DR, et al. The dental amalgam phasedown in New Zealand: A 20-year trend. Oper Dent 2020; 45(3): 255-64.