RESEARCH ARTICLE


Prevalence of β-lactam (blaTEM) and Metronidazole (nim) Resistance Genes in the Oral Cavity of Greek Subjects



Georgios Koukos1, *, Antonios Konstantinidis2, Lazaros Tsalikis2, Minas Arsenakis3, Theodora Slini4, Dimitra Sakellari2
1 251 General Air Force Hospital, Department of Periodontology, Athens, Greece
2 Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, Dental School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
3 Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 2176
Abstract HTML Views: 1395
PDF Downloads: 358
ePub Downloads: 222
Total Views/Downloads: 4151
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 968
Abstract HTML Views: 677
PDF Downloads: 223
ePub Downloads: 151
Total Views/Downloads: 2019



© Koukos et al. ; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Cpt-Georgios Koukos Department of Periodontology 251 General Air Force Hospital, Kanelopoulou 3, 11525, Athens, Greece; Tel.: 0030 6983520282; E-mail: gkoukos1977@gmail.com


Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of blaTEM and nim genes that encode resistance to β-lactams and nitroimidazoles, respectively, in the oral cavity of systemically healthy Greek subjects.

Materials and Methodology:

After screening 720 potentially eligible subjects, 154 subjects were recruited for the study, including 50 periodontally healthy patients, 52 cases of gingivitis and 52 cases of chronic periodontitis. The clinical parameters were assessed with an automated probe. Various samples were collected from the tongue, first molars and pockets >6mm, and analysed by polymerase chain reaction-amplification of the blaTEM and nim genes, using primers and conditions previously described in the literature.

Results:

There was a high rate of detection of blaTEM in plaque and tongue samples alike in all periodontal conditions (37% of plaque and 60% of tongue samples, and 71% of participants). The blaTEM gene was detected more frequently in the tongue samples of the periodontally healthy (56%) and chronic periodontitis (62%) groups compared to the plaque samples from the same groups (36% and 29%, respectively; z-test with Bonferroni corrections-tests, P<0.05). The nim gene was not detected in any of the 343 samples analysed.

Conclusion:

The oral cavity of Greek subjects often harbours blaTEM but not nim genes, and therefore the antimicrobial activity of β-lactams might be compromised.

Keywords: β-Lactams, blaTEM gene, metronidazole, microbial resistance, nim gene.



INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a major global issue, compromising the effective treatment of potentially life-threatening infections [1]. Resistance against important medical pathogens has been recognised and investigated worldwide, however, there is limited data in the literature concerning resistance in the oral cavity [2].

Various classes of antimicrobials, including several administered for periodontal infections, are ineffective against bacterial species due to the acquisition of antibiotic resistance, which is frequently spread by genetic material [3]. Antimicrobial resistance genes in the oral environment can be transferred among different species, or even genera, of bacteria by conjugation or plasmids, and can regulate various mechanisms of resistance [4, 5].

Typical examples of β-lactam resistance mechanisms are the production of antibiotic-inactivating enzymes, such as the β-lactamases, and alterations in the β-lactam targets, that is the penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) [6]. Another antibiotic resistance mechanism is the enhanced function of efflux pumps, which are known to transport antimicrobial molecules outside the bacterial cell [7]. In the case of nitroimidazoles, apart from the enhanced function of efflux pumps, another significant mechanism is the deficient prodrug activation, through alternative metabolic pathways, resulting in non-toxic compounds [8].

It has been shown that resistance to antibiotics is directly correlated to their usage for both antimicrobial treatment and other purposes (such as growth promotion in animals for aquaculture and agriculture), and, therefore, to the related policy of each country [9]. β-Lactams and metronidazole are commonly prescribed for dental infections and, thus, the prevalence of resistance to these antibiotics may have clinical implications. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of blaTEM and nim genes, which contribute to β-lactam and metronidazole resistance, respectively, in the oral cavity of Greek subjects with various periodontal conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

Subject Sample and Study Design

From September 2011 to April 2014, 720 subjects attending the Clinic of Periodontology at 251 Air Force Hospital, Athens, Greece and the Clinic of the Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, Dental School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, were screened for enrolment in the study.

Inclusion Criteria

To be included in the study, subjects should fulfill the following criteria:

  • a)  Age > 30 years.
  • b)  Absence of systemic diseases affecting the subjects’ immune system or medications known to affect perio-dontal tissues (causing gingival enlargement), infectious conditions (hepatitis, HIV) or pregnancy and lactation.
  • c)  No periodontal treatment or antibiotic intake during the last six months.

In addition, patients were required to meet one of the following conditions:

  • a)  Periodontal health (bleeding on probing <10%, without any clinical attachment loss ≥3 mm).
  • b)  Gingivitis (bleeding on probing >20%, without any clinical attachment loss ≥3 mm), or
  • c)  Moderate to advanced chronic periodontitis (presence of proximal attachment loss of ≥5 mm in ≥30% of teeth present) [10].

A total of 154 patients were finally enrolled in this cross-sectional study which were divided into three groups as follows: a) periodontally healthy (n = 50), b) gingivitis (n = 52), and c) chronic periodontitis (n = 52).

The study was conducted according to the protocol outlined by the Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece and approved by the Ethical Committee of the School of Dentistry (#120), while it was also in compliance with the ethical principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. All patients read and signed an approved informed consent document prior to participation in the study.

Clinical Assessments

Clinical recordings were performed at six points (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, lingual, and disto-lingual). Those were performed by a calibrated examiner (GK) routinely performing periodontal examination and therapy at 251 General Airforce Hospital using an automated probe (Florida probe, Florida Probe Corporation, Gainesville, FL, USA). The automated probe is documented for accuracy and reliability [11].

The recordings included the following parameters:

  • a)  Probing Pocket Depth
  • b)  Recession
  • c)  Clinical Attachment Level
  • d)  Bleeding on Probing

Clinical Sampling

Two clinical samples were collected from each patient: a pooled subgingival plaque sample from the mesio-buccal surface of the four first molars (or premolars in the absence of molars), taken with sterile Gracey curettes; and a sample collected from the dorsal surface of the tongue with a sterile straight surgical bone curette (Sklar Instruments, PA, USA), after applying three consecutive strokes. All samples were immediately placed in 200 μl of TE buffer (Tris HCL 10 mM, EDTA 1 mM, pH 7.5) and stored at -20°C until assayed. In addition, a third clinical sample, taken from the deepest periodontal pocket, was collected from chronic periodontitis patients.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

The Analysis of these specimens was performed blindly on coded samples. All experiments were carried out in the Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. DNA isolation was achieved by using a commercial DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR was initially used for the detection of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene to verify that the clinical samples contained identifiable bacterial DNA [12]. The samples were further analysed by PCR for the presence of genes that confer resistance to β-lactams and metronidazole. The blaTEM gene was chosen as an initial screening test, because TEM is the leading gene conferring resistance to β-lactams and, through mutations, it leads to the emergence of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) [13]. PCR conditions and primers are described in Table 1 [14, 15]. A Peltier Thermal Cycler (PTC-100, Peltier Thermal Cycler, MJ Research) was used for PCR.

Table 1.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions for 16S, blaTEM and nim.


PCR conditions 16S (625 bp) blaTEM (618 bp) nim (458 bp)
Initial denaturation 95°C for 5 min 94°C for 5 min 94°C for 10 min
Denaturation 94°C for 1 min 94°C for 1 min 94°C for 30 s
Annealing 55°C for 1 min 62°C for 1 min 62°C for 1 min
Extension 72°C for 1 min 72°C for 1 min 72°C for 1 min
Step 2 to 4 34 cycles 35 cycles 32 cycles
Final extension 72°C for 5 min 72°C for 10 min 72°C for 10 min
DNA template 5 µl 5 µl 5 µl
dNTPs mix, 10 mM 1 µl (200 µM) 2 µl (400 µM) 1 µl (200 µM)
Reaction Buffer 5x 10 µl 10 µl 10 µl
MgCl2 Solution, 25 mM 3 µl (1.5 mM) 4 µl (2 mM) 3 µl (1.5 mM)
Upstream Primer, 10 µM 2.5 µl (0.5 µM) 5 µl (1 µM) 5 µl (1 µM)
Downstream Primer, 10 µM 2.5 µl (0.5 µM) 5 µl (1 µM) 5 µl (1 µM)
Taq polymerase, 5 U/µl 0.25 µl (1.25 U) 0.25 µl (1.25 U) 0.25 µl (1.25 U)
Water for injection 25.75 µl 18.75 µl 20.75 µl
Values in parenthesis are final concentration

16S primers 5'-CAG GAT TAG ATA CCC TGG TAG TCC ACG C-3' and   5'- GAC GGG CGG TGT GTA CAA GGC CCG GGA ACG-3' [12] blaTEM primers 5'-AGA TCA GTT GGG TGC ACG AG -3' and   5'-CAG TGC TGC AAT GAT ACC GC -3' [15] nim primers 5'-ATG TTC AGA GAA ATG CGG CGT AAG CG-3' and   5'-GCT TCC TTG CCT GTC ATG TGC TC-3' [14]

Both negative and positive controls were used for each set of samples analysed by PCR. Sterile water for injection (Demo S.A. Pharmaceutical Industry) was used as a negative control (replacing DNA template in the PCR reaction mixture) and DNA from the BL21 strain of E. coli, infected with the PGRF plasmid known to carry the blaTEM gene (pGFPuv, Clontech labs, USA), and B. fragilis, carrying the nim gene, were used as positive controls.

The PCR amplification products were electrophoresed through a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, exposed under UV light and photographed. A 100 base pair (bp) DNA ladder (New England Biolabs) was used as a molecular weight standard. The amplified fragment sizes were 625 bp for 16S rRNA, 618 bp for blaTEM and 458 bp for nim. Gel electrophoresis was carried out twice for each PCR product to test the reproducibility of the results (Supplementary file 1). For verification purposes, random PCR products were sent for sequencing (VBC-Biotech, Vienna, Austria) and confirmed the identity of the amplicons.

Questionnaire

All subjects were interviewed by one of the authors (DS) and completed a questionnaire about the following:

a) Smoking.

b) Frequency of antibiotic intake for medical and dental reasons, class of antibiotics used 6-12 months before the

interview as well as up to 5 years prior to it.

c) Use of antibiotics without a prescription.

d) Availability of antibiotics at home.

e) Awareness of the problem of antibiotic resistance.

To avoid errors on behalf of the participants concerning the use of antibiotics, the class of antibiotics consumed was recorded based on the subjects’ personal national health record.

Statistical Analyses

The statistical analysis was carried out with the statistical package SPSS Statistics v.19 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, US). The experiment was set to have at least 90% power to detect changes of 25% with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 (two-tailed). A pilot study provided the expected values of the primary outcome variable [16]. For clinical parameters, indicators of descriptive statistics were used, such as the mean and standard deviation for each group, with the patient as the observational unit. Discrepancies in clinical parameters were detected by applying the Kruskal-Wallis test. Variations based on the distribution of participants according to gender and smoking, were detected by applying the z-test for proportions, adjusted with Bonferroni corrections. Differences in the prevalence of the investigated genes and answers to the questionnaire among periodontally healthy, gingivitis and periodontitis subjects, and within each group, were detected by applying the z-test for proportions, adjusted with Bonferroni corrections.

RESULTS

Clinical parameters and demographic data for participants are summarized in (Table 2). All groups varied substantially in terms of clinical parameters of periodontal disease (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.05). Although participants did not present statistically significant differences regarding age and smoking status, male subjects outnumbered the female ones in the chronic periodontitis group (z-test with Bonferroni corrections, P<0.05).

Table 2.

Demographic data and clinical parameters.


Diagnosis Total Age (mean years ± SD) Male (%) Smokers (%) Probing depth (mm) (mean ± SD) Recession (mean ± SD) Clinical attachment level (mm) (mean ± SD) Bleeding on probing (%)
Periodontal
health
50 46 ± 8 52

(a)
24 1.54 ± 0.2

(a)
0.04 ± 0.06 (a) 1.38 ± 0.24 (a) 6% ± 5% (a, b)
Gingivitis 52 49 ± 9 42

(b)
35 1.89 ± 0.3

(b)
0.06 ± 0.16 (b) 1.61 ± 0.4

(b)
34% ± 15% (a)
Chronic
periodontitis
52 50 ± 10 79

(a, b)
38 3.05 ± 0.6

(a, b)
0.31 ± 0.42 (a, b) 2.81 ± 0.6

(a, b)
32% ± 21% (b)

Statistically significant differences between groups are indicated by the same letter (Kruskal Wallis test and z-test with Bonferroni corrections, P < 0.05)

The distribution of blaTEM and nim is summarized in (Fig. 1). The nim gene was not detected in any of the 343 samples analysed. The overall presence of blaTEM in the subjects was estimated to be 71% (109 out of 154 subjects were positive in at least one sample).

The prevalence of blaTEM was similar in plaque or tongue samples for all three periodontal conditions (periodontal health, gingivitis and chronic periodontitis), when comparing across the same sampling site (z-test with Bonferroni corrections, P>0.05).

Fig. (1).

Prevalence of blaTEM (and nim) in plaque and tongue samples according to periodontal conditions.


The blaTEM gene was detected at a significantly higher rate in the tongue sample in both the periodontally healthy (56%) and the chronic periodontitis (62%) groups, compared to the plaque samples in these same groups (36% and 29%, respectively; z-test with Bonferroni corrections, P<0.05). In the chronic periodontitis subjects, the blaTEM gene was detected at a significantly lower rate in the deep periodontal pocket samples (26%) compared to the tongue samples (62%; z-test with Bonferroni corrections, P<0.05).

Gingivitis subjects, irrespective of the sampling site, had a significantly higher frequency of detection of the blaTEM gene (54%) compared to chronic periodontitis groups (40%)(z-test with Bonferroni corrections, P<0.05).

Table 3 summarizes the results from the questionnaire. The following major differences were observed among the groups: compared to periodontally healthy individuals, chronic periodontitis patients are less aware of antibiotic resistance and have been administered tetracyclines less frequently (P<0.05). β-Lactam antibiotics were the only class of antibiotics that had been administered during the 6-12 months before the survey and the most frequently prescribed antibiotics over the past 5 years (P<0.05) in all three groups of participants.

DISCUSSION

The current study was conducted in an attempt to investigate the frequency of detection of bacterial genes contributing to resistance to β-lactams and metronidazole in three locations in the oral cavity: subgingival plaque and tongue, from all patients, and deep periodontal pockets >6 mm from chronic periodontitis patients. Our results establish that one of the important genes encoding for the family of β-lactamases (blaTEM) is frequently detected in the oral cavity (tongue and plaque samples), regardless of the periodontal conditions (periodontal health, gingivitis or chronic periodontitis). Different periodontal conditions were assessed due to the fact that they reflect the presence of a wide variety of bacteria (predominance of anaerobes in periodontitis), which could lead to a difference in the presence of resistance genes. That being said, previous studies have assessed prevalence only in periodontitis patients [17, 18]. In our study gingivitis subjects had higher prevalence of resistance genes (54%) in comparison to periodontitis subjects (40%), suggesting that Gram-negative anaerobes might not be the main carriers of these genes. The sampling site was found to be more important than the periodontal condition, with the dorsal surface of the tongue consistently carrying the majority of the resistance genes regardless of the periodontal condition. In contrast, the gene conferring resistance to metronidazole (nim) was not detected in any of the 343 samples analysed in this study.

Table 3.

Consumption, attitude and knowledge about antibiotics of the subject sample.


Periodontal
health
(%) N=50
Gingivitis
(%) N=52
Chronic
periodontitis
(%) N=52
TOTAL
(%) N=154
Antibiotic use for medical
reasons during the last 5
years (%)
1-2 times 38%(19/50) 44%(23/52) 46%(24/52) 43%
3-4 times 26%(13/50) 25%(13/52) 29%(15/52) 27%
>5 times 36%(18/50)
(a)
27%(14/52) 15%(8/52)
(a)
26%
Antibiotic use for dental
reasons during the last 5
years (%)
1-2 times 54%(27/50) 42%(22/52) 42%(22/52) 46%
3-4 times 8%(4/50) 10%(5/52) 8%(4/52) 8%
>5 times 0% 4%(2/52) 6%(3/52) 3%
β-Lactams (%) Yes 89%(39/44) 73%(37/51) 75%(38/51) 78%
tetracyclines (%)

imidazoles (%)
Yes 31%(13/42)
(a)
20%(10/51) 6%(3/47)
(a)
18%
Yes 17%(7/41) 24%(12/51) 13%(6/47) 18%
Available at home (%) Yes 30%(15/50) 33%(17/52) 17%(9/52) 27%
Without Prescription (%) Yes 2%(1/50) 2%(1/52) 0%(0/52) 1%
By a pharmacist 14%(7/50) 25%(13/52) 15%(9/52) 18%
Antibiotic intake last 6-12
months (%)
Yes (β-lactams) 28%(14/50) 14%(7/51)
(a)
33%(17/52)
(a)
25%
Knowledge about
antimicrobial resistance
(%)
Yes 48%(24/50)
(a)
29%(15/51) 23%(12/52)
(a)
33%

Statistically significant differences among groups are indicated by the same letter. Statistically significant differences within each group are indicated by bold lettering (z-test for proportions with Bonferroni corrections, P<0.05).

β-Lactams are one of the most frequently prescribed classes of antibiotics for both medical and dental purposes, however, there is substantial concern about the compromised efficacy of these antimicrobials due to the development of bacterial resistance. Studies in the dental literature have addressed the issue of periodontal pathogen susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics (mainly amoxicillin) and whether certain bacterial species, for example, members of the oral microbiota such as Prevotella spp., can contribute to the establishment and dissemination of bacterial resistance in the subgingival environment [17].

Studies in Europe, using cultures of bacteria grown on selective plates, showed an important difference between the Netherlands and Spain in the amoxicillin resistance of periodontal strains of bacteria, reflecting the antibiotic prescription policy of each country [19]. A recent large-scale study in the US investigated antimicrobial resistance in 400 chronic periodontitis patients and reported a frequent occurrence of resistant species of subgingival periodontal pathogens [18, 20]. In this study, 74.2% of the patients harboured species resistant to several antibiotics including doxycycline, amoxicillin, clindamycin and metronidazole, and 43.3% of the patients had one or more test species that were resistant to amoxicillin. In the same study, 30.3% of patients harboured one or more metronidazole–resistant species, which included, as expected, exclusively non-anaerobic test species, such as Streptococci spp. In this study only 4 samples from anaerobic bacteria were truly metronidazole resistant, as metronidazole prodrug can only be activated in anaerobic conditions and therefore aerobic bacteria are intrinsically resistant. These studies collectively suggest that subgingival pathogens currently include species that are resistant to β-lactam antibiotics and nitroimidazoles.

Several studies have focused on the identification of the bacterial genera and species in the oral cavity that are sources of β-lactamases, one of the major mechanisms conferring resistance to β-lactams [21-23]. According to a well-established report, several members of the genus Prevotella, and Fusobacterium nucleatum are considered major producers of these enzymes, in addition to other species such as Tannerella forsythia, Neisseria and Capnocytophaga spp., which have also been shown to produce these enzymes [24].

The outcome of the present study suggests, a correlation between the observed frequency of the blaTEM gene and the high intake of the β-lactam class of antibiotics. A temporary increase in mean amoxicillin-resistant isolates has also been observed in chronic periodontitis patients after mechanical treatment and adjunctive therapy with amoxicillin for 14 days, but the percentage of resistant strains returned to pre-treatment levels after 90 days [25]. A recent report has also shown that subjects with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP) treated with adjunctive metronidazole plus amoxicillin have shown a significant increase in anaerobic microbiota resistant to amoxicillin within 2 months, returning to baseline values after 6 months, and indicated possible risks for increasing antimicrobial resistance to the population when empirically prescribing amoxicillin [26]. Thus, in order to avoid overestimation of prevalence, according to the present criteria for inclusion, none of the participants has used systemic antibiotics at least 6 months prior to enrollment in the study.

The personal official national health record of participants during the last five years has shown that >90% have received a course of antibiotics for medical reasons and >56% for dental reasons, with β-lactams being the significantly predominant class prescribed (>78%). According to the 2013 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control report, Greece had one of the highest rates of antibiotic consumption among the European countries (39.4 defined daily doses or DDDs per 1000 inhabitants), a parameter known to significantly affect antimicrobial resistance, and β-lactams were among the most frequently prescribed antibiotics (21.8 DDDs of which 12.9 were penicillin) [27].

In a previous study, regarding Greek subjects, the high prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes tetM (>92% of subjects) and tetQ (>75% of subjects) in the oral cavity could not be correlated to the intake of tetracyclines (18% of participants during the last 5 years) suggesting other sources of these specific genes, such as the environment or food chain [28]. In contrast, systemic administration of β-lactams appears to be a possible factor affecting the dissemination of the blaTEM gene in the present study population.

Metronidazole is one of the most popular antimicrobials in periodontology, due to its narrow spectrum against anaerobic bacteria, and has regained medical interest because of its effectiveness against Helicobacter pylori, the main cause of gastroduodenal ulcer, and against post surgical anaerobic infections. Bacterial resistance to metronidazole is usually conferred by the presence of nim genes, which encode a nitroimidazole reductase that prevents the formation of nitroso radicals, the cornerstone of the antibacterial activity of metronidazole [29]. The nine nim genes that have been described to date are usually located on plasmids or chromosomes and can be transferred by conjugation [30]. Although important Gram-negative anaerobic periodontal pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis have been shown to be susceptible to metronidazole [31], Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans is inherently resistant due to its microaerophilic properties. Low proportions (<2%) of the subgingival microbiota from refractory periodontitis patients have been shown to be resistant to metronidazole [18, 32], while, even after adjunctive treatment with this antibiotic for 14 days, chronic periodontitis subjects had an increased proportion of, mainly, resistant Actinomyces spp., which returned to baseline levels after 90 days [25]. The findings of the current study which suggest that the nim gene was not detected in any of the investigated samples, regardless of the source (tongue, subgingival sample or deep pockets in periodontitis patients), are in agreement with the above mentioned reports and indicate that metronidazole is still an important antimicrobial compound for treating periodontal disease in Greek subjects. Furthermore, according to the personal national health records of the participants, metronidazole was not prescribed to participants in the course of the last 12 months, and a much lower percentage of subjects (18%) had been prescribed this antibiotic compared to β-lactams, during the last 5 years. The low frequency of metronidazole use could be another factor contributing to the absence of detecting the nim gene in any of the analysed samples.

Due to specific conditions in the oral cavity, there is a well-established biofilm organization of oral microbial communities, and the close proximity of its members allows for the exchange of genetic material between species and genera, as previously reported in the literature [33]. More than 1000 bacterial species have currently been identified in dental biofilm communities, twice as many as can be cultured [34]. Thus, only molecular techniques, as applied in the current study, could assess the potential for antibiotic resistance in these communities. The high frequency of detection of the blaTEM gene in the current study suggests the possibility of dissemination of resistance to other members in the polymicrobial community [35]. On the other hand, the methods used in the current study do not allow for identification of the bacterial sources of the blaTEM gene, and it should be noted that the presence of a given resistance gene does not guarantee that it will be expressed. For this purpose, function expression analyses such as proteomic or transcriptomic methodology should be applied. Future studies could apply, as mentioned, more sophisticated methodologies and in addition examine a variety of different genes conferring resistance to β-lactams such as SHV, AmpC and CTX already documented to encode for resistance in Enterobacteriaceae [36].

Taken collectively, data from the present study suggest the frequent presence, in the oral cavity, of the blaTEM gene encoding resistance to β-lactams, but not of the nim gene. Although the presence of a gene does not ensure its expression, it strongly suggests that antimicrobials should be judiciously used in treating periodontitis, especially in countries such as Greece, with high rates of antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance.

CONCLUSION

The oral cavity of Greek subjects often harbours bacterial genes encoding for resistance to β-lactams. Thus, the antimicrobial activity of β-lactams, might be compromised. Since no metronidazole resistance genes were detected in the present study, its clinical use is supported by the current findings.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research has been partly co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund - ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: Heracletus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary material is available on the publisher's Web site along with the published article.

Download File


REFERENCES

[1] World Health Organization. The Evolving Threat of Antimicrobial Resistance: options for action. Geneva [cited 2015 August 13] 2015. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2012/9789241503181_eng.pdf
[2] Sweeney LC, Dave J, Chambers PA, Heritage J. Antibiotic resistance in general dental practice--a cause for concern? J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 53(4): 567-76.
[3] Fluit AC, Visser MR, Schmitz FJ. Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14(4): 836-71.
[4] Roberts AP, Pratten J, Wilson M, Mullany P. Transfer of a conjugative transposon, Tn5397 in a model oral biofilm. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999; 177(1): 63-6.
[5] Warburton PJ, Palmer RM, Munson MA, Wade WG. Demonstration of in vivo transfer of doxycycline resistance mediated by a novel transposon. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60(5): 973-80.
[6] Poole K. Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004; 61(17): 2200-23.
[7] Chopra I, Roberts M. Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2001; 65(2): 232-60.
[8] Carlier JP, Sellier N, Rager MN, Reysset G. Metabolism of a 5-nitroimidazole in susceptible and resistant isogenic strains of Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41(7): 1495-9.
[9] European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2012. Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) Stockholm [cited 2015 August 13] 2012. Available from: http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publica-tions/Publications/antimicrobial-resistance-surveillance-europe-2012.pdf
[10] Tonetti MS, Claffey N. Advances in the progression of periodontitis and proposal of definitions of a periodontitis case and disease progression for use in risk factor research. Group C consensus report of the 5th European Workshop in Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32(Suppl. 6): 210-3.
[11] Osborn J, Stoltenberg J, Huso B, Aeppli D, Pihlstrom B. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe. J Periodontol 1990; 61(8): 497-503.
[12] Goncharoff P, Figurski DH, Stevens RH, Fine DH. Identification of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: polymerase chain reaction amplification of lktA-specific sequences. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1993; 8(2): 105-10.
[13] Livermore DM. β-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 8(4): 557-84.
[14] Trinh S, Reysset G. Detection by PCR of the nim genes encoding 5-nitroimidazole resistance in Bacteroides spp. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34(9): 2078-84.
[15] Alsultan AA, Aboulmagd E, Amin TT. ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: antibiotic susceptibility and prevalence of blaSHV and blaTEM. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013; 7(12): 1016-9.
[16] Ioannidis I, Sakellari D, Spala A, Arsenakis M, Konstantinidis A. Prevalence of tetM, tetQ, nim and bla(TEM) genes in the oral cavities of Greek subjects: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36(7): 569-74.
[17] Fosse T, Madinier I, Hitzig C, Charbit Y. Prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing strains among 149 anaerobic gram-negative rods isolated from periodontal pockets. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1999; 14(6): 352-7.
[18] Rams TE, Degener JE, van Winkelhoff AJ. Antibiotic resistance in human chronic periodontitis microbiota. J Periodontol 2014; 85(1): 160-9.
[19] Walker CB. The acquisition of antibiotic resistance in the periodontal microflora. Periodontology 2000 1996; 10(1): 79-88.
[20] van Winkelhoff AJ, Herrera D, Oteo A, Sanz M. Antimicrobial profiles of periodontal pathogens isolated from periodontitis patients in The Netherlands and Spain. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32(8): 893-8.
[21] Patel M. The prevalence of beta lactamase-producing anaerobic oral bacteria in South African patients with chronic periodontitis. SADJ 2011; 66(9): 416-8.
[22] Rams TE, Degener JE, van Winkelhoff AJ. Prevalence of β-lactamase-producing bacteria in human periodontitis. J Periodontal Res 2013; 48(4): 493-9.
[23] Wilke MS, Lovering AL, Strynadka NC. Beta-lactam antibiotic resistance: a current structural perspective. Curr Opin Microbiol 2005; 8(5): 525-33.
[24] van Winkelhoff AJ, Winkel EG, Barendregt D, Dellemijn-Kippuw N, Stijne A, van der Velden U. βeta-lactamase producing bacteria in adult periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24(8): 538-43.
[25] Feres M, Haffajee AD, Allard K, Som S, Goodson JM, Socransky SS. Antibiotic resistance of subgingival species during and after antibiotic therapy. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29(8): 724-35.
[26] Guerrero A, Nibali L, Lambertenghi R, et al. Impact of baseline microbiological status on clinical outcomes in generalized aggressive periodontitis patients treated with or without adjunctive amoxicillin and metronidazole: an exploratory analysis from a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41(11): 1080-9.
[27] European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe, 2010 Stockholm [cited 2015 August 13] 2010. Available from: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/antimi-crobial-antibiotic-consumption-ESAC- report-2010-data.pdf
[28] Koukos G, Sakellari D, Arsenakis M, Tsalikis L, Slini T, Konstantinidis A. Prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes in the oral cavity of Greek subjects. J Biol Res-Thessalon 2013; 20: 387-94.
[29] Trinh S, Reysset G. Identification and DNA sequence of the mobilization region of the 5-nitroimidazole resistance plasmid pIP421 from Bacteroides fragilis. J Bacteriol 1997; 179(12): 4071-4.
[30] Alauzet C, Mory F, Teyssier C, et al. Metronidazole resistance in Prevotella spp. and description of a new nim gene in Prevotella baroniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54(1): 60-4.
[31] Abu-Fanas SH, Drucker DB, Hull PS, Reeder JC, Ganguli LA. Identification, and susceptibility to seven antimicrobial agents, of 61 gram-negative anaerobic rods from periodontal pockets. J Dent 1991; 19(1): 46-50.
[32] Listgarten MA, Lai CH, Young V. Microbial composition and pattern of antibiotic resistance in subgingival microbial samples from patients with refractory periodontitis. J Periodontol 1993; 64(3): 155-61.
[33] Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001; 358(9276): 135-8.
[34] ten Cate JM. Biofilms, a new approach to the microbiology of dental plaque. Odontology 2006; 94(1): 1-9.
[35] Hausner M, Wuertz S. High rates of conjugation in bacterial biofilms as determined by quantitative in situ analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65(8): 3710-3.
[36] Roschanski N, Fischer J, Guerra B, Roesler U. Development of a multiplex real-time PCR for the rapid detection of the predominant beta-lactamase genes CTX-M, SHV, TEM and CIT-type AmpCs in Enterobacteriaceae. PLoS One 2014; 9(7): e100956.