CORRECTION


Erratum Erratum to the article published in The Open Dentistry Journal, 2012, volume (4): page 191-194






Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1033
Abstract HTML Views: 1070
PDF Downloads: 261
Total Views/Downloads: 2364
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 625
Abstract HTML Views: 693
PDF Downloads: 189
Total Views/Downloads: 1507



Creative Commons License



Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin composites (Gradia Direct, Venus, Venus Diamond, Enamel Plus HFO, Tetric Evoceram, Filtek Supreme XT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For each composite, 12 square specimens were prepared: 9 specimens were polished, three for each different method, while three specimens were used as controls. Surface roughness was determined with AFM by measuring Root Mean Square (RMS) of average height.

RESULTS

PoGo polisher determined a significantly rougher surface, versus controls, in 5 out of 6 composites evaluated. Some significant differences from unpolished controls were observed also for Enhance polishing. Polishing with Venus Supra did not result in any significant difference in surface roughness versus controls. No differences were observed between different polishing systems.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that Venus Supra polishing system could determine a smoother composite surface if compared to the other polishing systems tested. On this basis, we are conducting an in vivo study to evaluate bacterial colonization on some combinations of composites and polishing protocols.