The Impact of Social Media Posts Concerning Esthetic Dentistry on Self-Esteem and Satisfaction Among Adults in Saudi Arabia

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Impact of Social Media Posts Concerning Esthetic Dentistry on Self-Esteem and Satisfaction Among Adults in Saudi Arabia

The Open Dentistry Journal 28 Mar 2022 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/18742106-v16-e2202141

Abstract

Background:

Social media platforms have become credible tools for spreading awareness of dental care as well as advertisements for esthetic dentistry, which may negatively affect users by leading to dissatisfaction and low self-esteem when they compare themselves with others.

Objective:

To measure self-esteem and satisfaction related to esthetic dentistry by administering a validated questionnaire to adults in Saudi Arabia, which investigates how they are affected by seeing the topic addressed on social media.

Methods:

This study investigated 515 participants living in Saudi Arabia. A self-administered validated questionnaire was electronically developed using Google Forms 2020. A link to the questionnaire was distributed through multiple social media platforms, such as WhatsApp, Twitter, and Instagram, to assess self-esteem and satisfaction resulting from the presentation of esthetic dentistry on social media platforms among adults. A pilot study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the questionnaire, which was modified based on feedback, as well as the results of the reliability testing.

Results:

The analysis showed that the social media platforms on which information about or advertisements for esthetic dentistry are most commonly found were Snapchat (45.8%) and Instagram (44.5%). A statistically significant association was found between the sociodemographic data, including age (P=0.00), gender (P=0.000), occupation (P=0.001), monthly income (P=0.000), and the effect of the appearance of one’s smile on willingness to post personal photos on social media.

Conclusion:

The findings suggest that seeing esthetic dentistry addressed on social media sites influences social media users’ self-esteem and satisfaction. Social media platforms should be encouraged to properly discuss common concerns and available dental treatments.

Keywords: Esthetic dentistry, Social media, Self-esteem, Dental self-confidence, Facial satisfaction, Psychological well-being.

1. INTRODUCTION

Patient satisfaction is the ultimate goal of any esthetic treatment. Any dental procedure should fulfill the patients’ expectations of improving their facial appearance and smile [1]. The field of esthetic dentistry has been under constant evolution, as new technologies, products, and equipment have been developed, and experiences have improved. Dentists have led the way in changing lives by employing a tailor-made approach that uses certain elements to fit every patient’s specific needs in regard to improving oral health and the smile [2]. Dental patients seeking esthetic treatment today are knowledgeable and have explicit goals [3].

As in any other form of therapy, a psychological element is essential in esthetic dental treatment [3]. There is ample evidence that a person’s appearance has a significant effect on his or her life experiences, and that a healthy, attractive smile can achieve this successfully [2]. At present, esthetics is recognized in various environments as referring to personal appearance, which influences various aspects of life, such as work, behavior, self-esteem, and social connection [4]. Significant physical, psychological, mental, and personality changes can influence individuals’ futures [4].

Social media are an electronic innovation that encourage the sharing of thoughts, ideas, and information through networking tools and applications [5, 6]. The most popular social media applications are YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn, all of which have undergone continuous, rapid, and massive development [7]. Digital reports published in 2020 showed that the use of social media and mobile phones has become an important part of everyday life for people worldwide [8]. More than 4.5 billion individuals currently use the web, while there are over 3.8 billion social media users [8]. The total population of the Middle East was estimated in 2020 to stand at 260 million, 183 million of whom use the internet [9]. According to Global Media Sight statistics, in January 2020, there were about 32.23 million internet users in Saudi Arabia, an increase of 15%, or 4.3 million users, over the figures for 2019 [10]. Moreover, there were an estimated 25 million social media users in Saudi Arabia in January 2020, showing a further increase of 2 million (8.7%) between April 2019 and January 2020 [10].

Because of their popularity, social media applications have become credible tools for spreading healthcare awareness and marketing dental health care services. Many dentists, from different dental specialties, share cases of cosmetic dentistry, restorative dentistry, dental surgery, orthodontics, periodontics, and dental implants on social media sites [11-14], and some healthcare providers use social media to publish questionnaires and articles for research purposes [12]. One cross-sectional study investigated the influence of social media on the decision to have a procedure to produce a “Hollywood smile” among 100 university students in the city of Riyadh and found a gender influence: Females were more dissatisfied with their smiles and wanted to enhance their appearance [15]. The study also showed that older participants are more affected by celebrities’ smiles, leading them to seek esthetic dental treatment [15].

A randomized controlled trial study was conducted to investigate social media sites’ effect on body dissatisfaction and smile dissatisfaction on a sample of 132 young adults (edited versus natural non-edited Instagram picture). It was found that post-exposure to ideal facial images has a statistically significant influence on facial and smile dissatisfaction but not on body dissatisfaction, while gender has no effect on either type of dissatisfaction [16].

A campus-based survey of North Indian University students showed that self-perceived pictures of dental esthetics have a remarkable effect on the subjects’ social and psychological status, which is reflected in their behavior, self confidence, and satisfaction [17]. Hence, the presenting of esthetic dentistry, such as veneers or a Hollywood smile, on social media sites may affect users of such sites negatively, leading to dissatisfaction and low self-esteem as a result of comparing oneself to others [16].

Research of social media’s impact on self-esteem and dissatisfaction has indicated a direct negative influence on body image, especially in young women [16]. To our knowledge, no studies of this kind have been carried out in Saudi Arabia; nor has psychological wellbeing related to dental esthetics as presented in social media been measured in the Middle East. Therefore, the current study aims to measure self-esteem and satisfaction by using a validated questionnaire [18], related to dental esthetics, which investigates the impact of how dental topics are addressed on social media among adults in Saudi Arabia.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the institutional review board (IRB) of Umm Al-Qura University (Approval No. HAPO-02-K-012-2021-01-531). An online sample size calculator accessed in 17 Feb 2021 (www.calculator.net) was used to calculate a sample size of 385, based on the most recent estimates of Saudi Arabia’s population (34,813,871), with a significance level of 0.05, 95% confidence level, and 5% margin of error. Inclusion criteria were that participants must be adults over the age of 19, social media users living in Saudi Arabia, who had received or considered receiving any esthetic dental treatment or consultation (orthodontics, bleaching, anterior restoration, veneers, Hollywood smile, shaping of teeth, e.t.c.). Adolescents under the age of 19, adults over the age of 65, adults who do not use social media, and adults who had not received or considered receiving esthetic dental treatment were excluded from the study.

A self-administered validated questionnaire was developed based on Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale (RSES) and the questionnaires developed by Ansari et al. [15] and Al Awdah et al. [18], which were modified to suit the study. This questionnaire was used to assess self-esteem and satisfaction among adults in Saudi Arabia in regard to the way esthetic dentistry is presented on social media. The questionnaire contained 28 closed- and open-ended questions in Arabic, this being the primary language of our target population. The questionnaire was electronically developed using Google Forms 2020. A link to the questionnaire was generated and distributed through multiple social media platforms, such as WhatsApp, Twitter, and Instagram.

As the questionnaire was electronic, participants gave their consent by default by answering it. An explanation of the study and the purpose of data collection was given at the beginning of the electronic questionnaire. Participants’ privacy and confidentiality were assured, no identifiers were collected, and all data, both hard and soft copies, were stored on Umm Al-Qura University premises and could only be accessed by the research team.

A pilot study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. Twenty participants were asked to answer the questionnaire; then, a week later, they were asked to do so a second time. Each participant assessed how long it took to answer, the clarity of the questions, and the ability to understand each question. The questionnaire was modified based on both their feedback and the results of the reliability testing.

Data entry and analysis were carried out using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were carried out to analyze categorical variables. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.

3. RESULTS

A total of 515 completed questionnaires was received. About half the respondents (50.9%) were aged between 19 and 29. Two thirds of the respondents (68.7%) were female, and, in terms of educational level, more than three quarters (77.3%) had achieved a bachelor’s degree. It was also found that the majority of the participants (93.4%) were not dental care providers, and most (83.5%) were not public speakers and did not work in media/social media, as shown in Table 1.

Findings also showed that 62.5% of the participants prefer to receive information about dental health through social media. As concerns esthetic dental treatment, 23.3% have received such treatment and been satisfied with it but think that it has not changed their smile, while 35% have not had esthetic dental treatment. Furthermore, 38.9% think that posting information, cases, and advertisements related to esthetic dentistry on social media is positive, as shown in Table 2.

Table 1.
Participants’ socio-demographic characteristics (N=515).
Parameter - No. Percent
Age 19–29 262 50.9%
30–39 97 18.8%
40–49 93 18.1%
50–59 53 10.3%
60–65 10 1.9%
Gender Female 354 68.7%
Male 161 31.3%
Educational level University degree 58 77.3%
Postgraduate (master–PhD degree) 398 11.5%
High school or less 59 11.3%
Occupation Employee in governmental sector 144 28.0%
Student 87 24.1%
Unemployed 32 17.7%
Employee in private sector 34 16.9%
Retired 124 6.6%
Self-employed 91 6.2%
Other 3 0.6%
Nationality Saudi 493 95.7%
Non-Saudi 22 4.3%
Monthly income Less than 4000 SR 213 41.4%
8000–11,999 SR 72 26.6%
12,000–29,000 SR 137 16.9%
4000–7999 SR 87 14.0%
More than 30,000 SR 6 1.2%
Are you a dental care provider? No 481 93.4%
Yes 34 6.6%
Are you a public speaker or do you work in media or social media? No 430 83.5%
Yes 85 16.5%
Table 2.
Responses of participants regarding the experience of esthetic dentistry (N=515).
Parameter No. Percent
Have you ever received or considered receiving any esthetic dental treatment or consultation (orthodontics, bleaching, anterior restorations, veneers, shaping of teeth, etc.)? Yes 515 100.0%
Do you have an account on any social media platform? Yes 490 95.1%
No 25 4.9%
Do you prefer receiving information about dental health through social media? Yes 322 62.5%
Not interested 118 22.9%
No 75 14.6%
Do you trust the information you get from social media about esthetic dental treatments or products? Neutral 206 40.0%
I only trust information I get on social media from dentists or people I know 189 36.7%
I do not trust any of the dental-related information I get from social media 61 11.8%
I highly trust all or most of the dental-related information I get on social media 59 11.5%
Have you ever had esthetic dental treatment or considered having such treatment due to seeing advertisements, information, or pictures about esthetic dentistry on social media? No, I have never visited or considered visiting a dentist for that reason 222 43.1%
Yes, I have visited a dental esthetic clinic but not mainly for that reason 159 30.9%
Yes, I have visited or highly considered visiting a dentist for that reason 134 26.0%
If you have had any esthetic dental treatment, how satisfied were you with the results? I have not had any esthetic dental treatment 180 35.0%
I was satisfied with the results but it didn’t change my smile significantly 120 23.3%
I was highly satisfied with the results, which have improved my quality of life 100 19.4%
I was not satisfied at all, and my smile has got worse 68 13.2%
I have not noticed any difference, and it doesn’t affect my life 47 9.1%
What do you think about the influence of presenting topics, cases, and advertisements for esthetic dentistry on social media? It can have a general positive influence to motivate people to take care of their smile and improve their quality of life 200 38.9%
Positive with a slight negative effect 165 32.1%
This can have a general negative influence by making people obsessed with the image of the ideal smile, which may reduce their self-esteem 81 15.8%
I don’t see any influence of that 48 9.3%
Negative with a slight positive effect 20 3.9%
Are you satisfied overall with your smile and the look of your teeth? Satisfied 220 42.7%
Not satisfied 102 19.8%
Neutral 99 19.2%
Highly satisfied 80 15.5%
Not satisfied at all 14 2.7%
Are you confident in the appearance of your teeth while talking or smiling in photos, videos, and public speaking, or when close to other people? Yes, I have some confidence, but I would be more confident if I had a better smile 195 37.9%
Yes, I feel highly confident and like to show my smile 149 28.9%
No, I don’t feel confident enough to smile in front of a camera or people 114 22.1%
I have never thought about or been concerned about that 57 11.1%

As shown in Fig. (1), the social media platforms on which users most commonly find information about or advertisements for esthetic dentistry are Snapchat (45.8%), Instagram (44.5%).

According to our findings, common motives for visiting a dentist for esthetic treatment are recommendations from personal contacts (44.3%), offers and discounts on esthetic treatment (38.6%). The least common motive was recommendations from celebrities (7.6%), as shown in Table 3.

Participants self-rated their satisfaction with various esthetic elements of their smile on a score from 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) for each element. The mean percentage of the satisfaction of patients with their dental esthetics overall, based on self-evaluation, was 68 ± 18.8. The mean score of satisfaction with the esthetic elements ranged between 5 and 7. Alignment, symmetry, and absence of spacing or crowding of teeth showed a mean score of 7.1 ± 2.4, while the mean score for the protrusion or retrusion of the upper and lower jaw and alignment of bite was 6.3 ± 2.4. The color and shade of teeth presented a mean score of 6.2 ± 2.4, and the shape and size of the front teeth showed a mean of 7.3 ± 2.5. The mean score of the length of the front teeth revealed during talking or smiling and the amount of gum shown around the teeth during talking or smiling were 7.7 ± 2.5 and 7.2 ± 3, respectively. The quality of any current restoration/veneer/crown in front teeth showed the lowest score (5.5 ± 3.1), as shown in Table 4.

Table 3.
Potential motives for visiting a dentist for esthetic dental treatment.
Parameter No. Yes
Recommendations from personal contacts 228 44.3%
Offers and discounts on esthetic treatment 199 38.6%
Pre–post picture of real cases posted 165 32.0%
Quality of information provided about esthetic dental treatment 159 30.9%
Educational qualifications of the dentists 130 25.2%
Recommendations from celebrities 39 7.6%
Other; please specify 11 2.1%
Fig. (1). Social media on which information/advertising about esthetic dentistry is mostcommonly found.
Table 4.
Participants’ self-rating for each of the following aspects of their smile from 0.
Satisfaction Item (010 Score) No. Mean ± SD (Min – Max)
The alignment, symmetry, spacing, or crowding of any teeth 513 7.1 ± 2.4 (0 - 10)
The protrusion or retrusion of the upper and lower jaw and bite 457 6.3 ± 3.4 (0 - 10)
The color and shade of their teeth 513 6.2 ± 2.4 (0 - 10)
The integrity, shape, and size of their front teeth 512 7.3 ± 2.5 (0 - 10)
The length of their upper or lower front teeth revealed during talking or smiling 499 7.7 ± 2.5 (0 - 10)
The amount of gum shown around their teeth during talking or smiling 492 7.2 ± 3 (0 - 10)
The quality of any current restoration of/veneer or crown on front teeth 366 5.5 ± 3.1 (0 - 10)
Score (Percentage from all answered questions) 515 68 ± 18.8 (0 - 100)

Overall satisfaction with the smile and the appearance of teeth, as well as the satisfaction score in association with socio-demographic factors, are presented in Table 5. Age (P=0.000), gender (P=0.000), educational level (P=0.003), occupation (P=0.000), and monthly income (P=0.004) were statistically significantly associated with the overall satisfaction with the smile and the look of the teeth.

Table 5.
shows participants’ overall satisfaction with their smile and the look of their teeth, and the satisfaction score in association with the socio-demographic factors.
- Overall Satisfaction with Smile and the Look of Teeth Satisfaction score
Satisfied Neutral Unsatisfied Mean ± SD
Age 19–29 63.0% 23.3% 13.7% 69.8 ± 18.9
30–39 48.5% 12.4% 39.2% 69.4 ± 16.8
40–49 49.5% 11.8% 38.7% 64.4 ± 19.3
50–59 64.2% 24.5% 11.3% 64.4 ± 19.3
60–65 80.0% 20.0% 0.0% 60.2 ± 20.5
p-value 0.000*
Gender Female 64.4% 21.5% 14.1% 67.8 ± 19
Male 44.7% 14.3% 41.0% 68.3 ± 18.2
p-value 0.000*
Nationality Saudi 58.8% 19.1% 22.1% 68.4 ± 18.5
Non-Saudi 45.5% 22.7% 31.8% 58.7 ± 22.5
p-value 0.433*
Educational level High school or less 36.2% 31.0% 32.8% 58.4 ± 21.3
College/university (diploma or bachelor degree) 60.3% 18.8% 20.9% 68.5 ± 18.7
Postgraduate (master–PhD degree) 66.1% 10.2% 23.7% 74.2 ± 12.6
p-value 0.003*
Occupation Employee in governmental sector 66.0% 14.6% 19.4% 67.6 ± 18.4
Employee in private sector 41.4% 14.9% 43.7% 66.4 ± 21.1
Self-employed 46.9% 18.8% 34.4% 65.9 ± 18.2
Retired 55.9% 26.5% 17.6% 66.9 ± 18.8
Student 65.3% 23.4% 11.3% 73.9 ± 15.9
Unemployed 58.2% 22.0% 19.8% 63 ± 19.1
Other 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 77.1 ± 21.4
p-value 0.000*
Dental care provider (e.g., dentist, dental assistant, dental student, dental technician) No 57.2% 19.5% 23.3% 67.7 ± 18.2
Yes 73.5% 14.7% 11.8% 72.6 ± 24.9
p-value 0.156
Are you a public speaker or do you work in media or social media? No 57.4% 20.2% 22.3% 68.6 ± 17.9
Yes 62.4% 14.1% 23.5% 65.1 ± 22.6
p-value 0.423* 0.377**
Monthly income Less than 4000 SR 58.7% 24.9% 16.4% 67.7 ± 18.3
4000–7999 SR 47.2% 13.9% 38.9% 66.2 ± 21.9
8000–11,999 SR 59.1% 16.1% 24.8% 68.3 ± 16.8
12,000–29,000 SR 63.2% 14.9% 21.8% 69.3 ± 19
More than 30,000 SR 83.3% 16.7% 0.0% 74.1 ± 32.9
p-value 0.004*
Do you have an account on any of the social media platform? Currently 59.2% 18.6% 22.2% 68.1 ± 18.6
Previously 40.0% 32.0% 28.0% 66.4 ± 22.1
p-value 0.130*
*Numbers were analyzed by Chi-square test.

A statistically significant association was found between the sociodemographic data, including age (P=0.00), gender (P=0.000), occupation (P=0.001), monthly income (P=0.000), and the appearance of the smile when posting personal photos on social media. Also, there was a statistically significant association between sociodemographic data, including age (0.000), gender (0.000), educational level (0.018), and occupation (0.000) and the tendency to hide one’s teeth with the hand while smiling/talking or smiling with a closed mouth because of the appearance of the smile, as shown in Table 6.

4. DISCUSSION

This study aimed to measure the self-esteem and satisfaction of adults in Saudi Arabia with their dental esthetics as a result of browsing various dental topics, pictures, or advertisements on social media. To our knowledge, no previous studies have been carried out in Saudi Arabia or the wider Middle East to measure psychological wellbeing related to how esthetic dentistry is presented on social media. This study discusses the impact of social media on the perceptions of people in Saudi Arabia of their smiles. Since social media have a significant impact on people, they can be used to improve dental health awareness among people by encouraging healthcare providers to discuss the common concerns people have and properly present available dental treatments without misleading them for commercial purposes.

In this study, we measured outcomes using a validated questionnaire. Our analysis showed that the majority of the participants using social media were aged from 19 to 29 years. Previous studies have shown that the younger age group is more likely to use social media to view dental esthetics, which is in agreement with our results [11, 16, 18]. Over two thirds of the participants were females, and most had achieved a university degree.

As a result of our investigation, we found that higher monthly income improves people’s satisfaction with their smile, the appearance of their teeth, and the look of their smile when they post personal photos on social media, while a lower monthly income is linked to decreased satisfaction [4].

Table 6.
shows the associations between socio-demographic data and the effect of the look of their smile on participants’ willingness to post their photos on social media and the effect of other people’s opinions on their smiles.
Parameter The appearance of the smile may prevent them from posting photos on social media Hiding their teeth with the hand while smiling/talking or tending to smile with a closed mouth because of the appearance of their smile
Yes No Always Sometimes Never noticed Never
Age 19–29 16.4% 83.6% 9.5% 21.8% 37.0% 31.7%
30–39 42.3% 57.7% 37.1% 12.4% 12.4% 38.1%
40–49 30.1% 69.9% 22.6% 12.9% 19.4% 45.2%
50–59 24.5% 75.5% 3.8% 15.1% 26.4% 54.7%
60–65 20.0% 80.0% 0.0% 10.0% 50.0% 40.0%
p-value 0.000 0.000
Gender Female 18.6% 81.4% 8.2% 21.5% 30.5% 39.8%
Male 37.9% 62.1% 34.2% 8.7% 23.6% 33.5%
p-value 0.000 0.000
Nationality Saudi 24.3% 75.7% 15.8% 17.8% 28.4% 37.9%
Non-Saudi 31.8% 68.2% 27.3% 9.1% 27.3% 36.4%
p-value 0.426 0.450
Educational level High school or less 24.1% 75.9% 17.2% 22.4% 19.0% 41.4%
College/university (diploma or bachelor degree) 24.6% 75.4% 15.1% 18.1% 31.4% 35.4%
Postgraduate (master–PhD degree) 25.4% 74.6% 23.7% 8.5% 16.9% 50.8%
p-value 0.986 0.018
Occupation Employee in governmental sector 24.3% 75.7% 11.8% 13.9% 27.8% 46.5%
Employee in private sector 43.7% 56.3% 39.1% 13.8% 16.1% 31.0%
Self-employed 21.9% 78.1% 25.0% 18.8% 28.1% 28.1%
Retired 23.5% 76.5% 2.9% 23.5% 38.2% 35.3%
Student 16.9% 83.1% 11.3% 19.4% 37.1% 32.3%
Unemployed 19.8% 80.2% 9.9% 20.9% 26.4% 42.9%
Other 0.0% 100.0% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3%
p-value 0.001 0.000
Dental care provider (e.g., dentist, dental assistant, dental student, dental technician) No 25.4% 74.6% 16.8% 16.6% 27.9% 38.7%
Yes 14.7% 85.3% 8.8% 29.4% 35.3% 26.5%
p-value 0.164 0.107
Are you a public speaker or do you work in media or social media? No 24.0% 76.0% 16.0% 17.0% 28.1% 38.8%
Yes 28.2% 71.8% 17.6% 20.0% 29.4% 32.9%
p-value 0.403 0.759
Monthly income Less than 4000 SR 15.5% 84.5% 10.8% 21.6% 34.7% 32.9%
4000–7999 SR 47.2% 52.8% 37.5% 20.8% 9.7% 31.9%
8000–11,999 SR 32.8% 67.2% 19.7% 10.9% 32.8% 36.5%
12,000–29,000 SR 16.1% 83.9% 6.9% 16.1% 23.0% 54.0%
More than 30,000 SR 16.7% 83.3% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 83.3%
p-value 0.000 0.000
Do you have an account on any of the social media platform? Currently 24.7% 75.3% 16.7% 17.6% 28.2% 37.6%
Previously 24.0% 76.0% 8.0% 16.0% 32.0% 44.0%
p-value 0.937 0.675
*Numbers were analyzed by Chi-square test.

The majority of the participants were confident about the appearance of their teeth during talking or smiling in photos, videos, public speaking, or close to others, but they would be more confident if they had a better smile. The null hypothesis assumed that showing esthetic dentistry on social media has no impact on self-esteem and satisfaction among adults in Saudi Arabia; however, our results suggested that social media does, in fact, influence self-esteem and satisfaction.

The key strength of our study was the adequate sample size, as the number of actual participants (515) exceeded the calculated sample size (385). Since this was a cross-sectional study using a questionnaire, the limitations were that the real impact of social media on respondents may or may not be anticipated and that participants spend different amounts of time using social media platforms.

CONCLUSION

Dissatisfaction with a smile has a negative influence on psychological wellbeing and could affect an individual’s quality of life. Therefore, the impact of dental appearance should not be ignored. The overall impact of how esthetic dentistry is presented on social media on self-esteem and satisfaction was found to be statistically significant. The use of social media by healthcare providers should be encouraged to discuss common concerns and properly present available dental treatment without misleading social media users for commercial purposes.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The study received ethical approval from the IRB of the College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia (IRB No. HAPO-02-K-012-2021-01-531).

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals were used in this research. All research procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

As the questionnaire was electronic, participants gave their consent by default by answering the questionnaire. An explanation of the study and the purpose of data collection was given at the beginning of the electronic questionnaire.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines and methodologies were followed in this study.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [G.A.] upon reasonable request.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Jafri Z, Ahmad N, Sawai M, Sultan N, Bhardwaj A. Digital Smile Design-An innovative tool in aesthetic dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020; 10(2): 194-8.
2
Tran Cao P. The use of botulinum toxin and dermal fillers to enhance patients’ perceived attractiveness. Dent Clin North Am 2020; 64(4): 659-68.
3
Sheets CG. Modern dentistry and the esthetically aware patient. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115(Spec No): 103E-5E.
4
Mafla AC, Luna eg, Sánchez NR, Barrera DA, Muñoz GM. Dental aesthetics and self-esteem in adolescents. Colomb Med (Cali) 2011; 482-9.
5
Fisher J, Clayton M. Who gives a tweet: assessing patients’ interest in the use of social media for health care. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2012; 9(2): 100-8.
6
Thackeray R, Neiger BL, Keller H. Integrating social media and social marketing: a four-step process. Health Promot Pract 2012; 13(2): 165-8.
7
Wylie L. The social media revolution. Br J Midwifery 2014; 22(7): 502-6.
8
Kemp S. Digital 2020: 3.8 billion people use social media – We Are Social We Are Social 2020. Available from: https://wearesocial.com/blog/2020/01/digital-2020-3-8-billion-people-use-social-media
9
AlDajani I. Internet Communication Technology (ICT) for Reconciliation 2020.
10
Kemp S. Digital 2019: Global digital overview – datareportal – global digital insights DataReportal – Global Digital Insights 2021. Available from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-global-digital-overview
11
Ajwa N, Al Mohsen S, Kuwail A, Al Osaif E. The impact of using social media networks on dental treatment marketing in Saudi Arabia: the practitioners and patient’s perspectives. Journal of Oral Health and Dental Science 2018; 1(1): 1.
12
Denecke K, Bamidis P, Bond C, et al. Ethical Issues of Social Media Usage in Healthcare. Yearb Med Inform 2015; 10(1): 137-47.
13
Eysenbach G, Wyatt J. Using the Internet for surveys and health research. J Med Internet Res 2002; 4(2)e13
14
Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P&T 2014; 39(7): 491-520.
15
Ansari S, Abdullah Alzahrani A, Said Abomelha A, Attia Elhalwagy A, Mustafa Alalawi T, Mahmoud Sadiq T. Influence of Social Media towards the Selection of Hollywood Smile among the University Students in Riyadh City. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9(6): 3037-41.
16
Sampson A, Jeremiah HG, Andiappan M, Newton JT. The effect of viewing idealised smile images versus nature images via social media on immediate facial satisfaction in young adults: A randomised controlled trial. J Orthod 2020; 47(1): 55-64.
17
Afroz S, Rathi S, Rajput G, Rahman SA. Dental esthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self confidence: a campus based survey of north Indian university students. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013; 13(4): 455-60.
18
Al Awdah AS, Ali BB, Al Twaim S, Al Habdan AA. The power of social media on esthetic dental treatment choices in arabian gulf region. Int J Dent Oral Health 2019; 4: 2378-0.