Sealability of Different Root Canal Nanosealers: Nano Calcium Hydroxide and Nano Bioactive Glass

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sealability of Different Root Canal Nanosealers: Nano Calcium Hydroxide and Nano Bioactive Glass

The Open Dentistry Journal 30 Aug 2019 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/1874210601913010308

Abstract

Background:

The success of the endodontic treatment is largely dependent on the sealing achieved by root canal obturation. The application of sealer fills imperfections and increases adaptation of the root filling to the canal walls.

Aim:

To evaluate the sealability of experimental nanosealers (nano calcium hydroxide and nano bioactive glass) and to compare it with the commercial zinc oxide eugenol sealer using a dye penetration method.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected. The tooth crowns were removed so as to obtain standardized 15-mm-long root specimens. The root canal was instrumented with Protaper Ni-Ti rotary file and the final file size was up to # F4/.06 (in vitro study). They were then randomly allocated into 3 groups of 20 specimens each (n=20) according to the sealer used for obturation, and all samples were filled with single cone gutta-percha (#40/06) and one of the tested sealers. All teeth were coated with nail polish and then suspended in 2% methylene blue dye for 7 days. Stereo-microscope (x10) was used to evaluate the sealability of newly introduced nanosealers. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA test followed by post hoc analysis (P < 0.05).

Results:

Significant improvement shown by the presented study suggests that nano calcium hydroxide sealer showed significantly less dye leakage than nano bioactive glass sealer and zinc oxide eugenol sealer.

Conclusion:

The results of this study showed that the synthesized nano-powder sealers are suitable for use in root canal therapy to prevent leakage.

The root canal can be sealed better by using smaller nano-powder particle sizes. In addition, the two groups exhibited significant differences in leakage in comparison with commonly used ZOE sealer.

Keywords: Dye penetration test, Nanosealers, Obturation, Sealability, Zinc Oxide, Protaper Ni-Ti rotary.

1. INTRODUCTION

Adequate obturation of the root canal system constitutes one of the most important stages of endodontic treatment, which significantly affects its final result [1]. Therefore, a permanent three-dimensional seal is developed from the apical foramen to the root canal orifice.

A variety of materials are available for root canal obturation; however, the Gutta-percha cones along with the sealer remains the most accepted choice of the clinician.

The application of sealer fills imperfections and increases adaptation of the root filling to the canal walls. Different types of sealers have been used in conjunction with Gutta-percha for root canal obturation with varied success [2-4].

It has been documented that teeth obturated with Gutta-percha along with sealer display a better sealing ability than those obturated without sealer [5-7]. Incomplete sealing and presence of spaces between the root canal wall and the obturating material can lead to failure in apparently good treatment [8, 9]. To overcome these drawbacks, new nanoparticles sealers have been introduced to enhance the sealability [10].

Nanotechnology is the science of evaluating and producing materials in nano-dimensions by re-location and re-arrangement of atoms to prepare materials with better properties. Nanoparticles (Np) are ultrafine particles of insoluble constituents with a diameter of less than 100 nm [11-13].

Presence of very small particles leads to superior properties of the material [14]. These unique properties, which are the subject of quantum mechanics, have attracted a great deal of interest [15]. Nanotechnology infuses scientific branches from biology, chemistry, physics, and engineering, hence called interdisciplinary subject opens new doors of applications [16].

Nanotechnology has been introduced in the dental field firstly for restorative materials [17]. Dental nanocomposites provided a cosmetically acceptable result with excellent mechanical properties for both bulk [18] and fiber-reinforced materials [19].

The use of nanofillers has also been described for endodontic sealing purposes (Cytotoxicity of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers [20] and their sealing ability is an interesting variable to be evaluated.

Because of these valuable properties, utilization of nanoparticles in production of endodontic sealers has become favorable for many researchers. Recently, the authors of this article prepared new experimental endodontic sealers [nano- powder (calcium hydroxide and bioactive glass)] in the Dental Material Research Center (NanoTech Egypt for Photo-Electronics, Al-Giza, Egypt). These sealers are similar to various calcium hydroxide and bioactive glass-based sealers, but with different sizes of nano-particles. The sealing ability of our synthesized nano-sized calcium hydroxide and bioactive glass sealers was compared with zinc oxide eugenol sealer.

The recently-introduced nanosealers (nano calcium hydroxide and nano bioactive glass) are known to possess great ability to inhibit biofilm formation within the sealer dentin interface, reduce cytotoxicity, and improve sealability [21, 22].

In this case, the small size of the nanoparticles can also prove to be beneficial. Although recent research has shown that the addition of nanoparticles to the endodontic sealers does not change its physical or mechanical properties, a slight change in the flowability of the sealer was noted [23]. This can result in improving the penetration of this modified sealer into the minute dentinal tubules and better sealability.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS (In vitro study)

2.1. Nano Calcium Hydroxide

2.1.1. Manufacture Method in this Study

(NanoTech Egypt for Photo-Electronics, Al-Giza, Egypt).

Homogeneous phase precipitation which normally takes place in the aqueous phase following mixing of a strong base (e.g., NaOH) and Ca salt (e.g., CaCl2 or Ca(NO3)2) solutions [24, 25]. Variations to this route include synthesis in organic liquids (hydrocarbons) using surfactants that adopt a reverse-type micelle configuration around Ca(OH)2 colloidal particles [26] and synthesis in water-in-oil emulsions [27].

2.1.2. Size & Shape

TEM (JEM 2100, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was performed on JEOL JEM-2100 high-resolution transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV [28], respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. (1). Shows the TEM images of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles.

2.2. Nano Bioactive Glass

2.2.1. Manufacture Method used in this Study (NanoTech Egypt for Photo-Electronics, Al-Giza, Egypt)

The production of 45S5 bioactive glass has traditionally been carried out through sol-gel methods. The sol-gel method is a wet-chemical technique that can be used for the fabrication of both glassy and ceramic materials [29]. In the sol-gel process, the precursors are catalyzed and dissolved in the solvent to form a sol. The sol gradually becomes a gel-like diphasic system containing both a liquid and a solid phase.

The morphology ranges from dispersed particles to continuous polymer-like networks, which mainly depends on the pH and solvent. Generally, the sol-gel process includes hydrolysis, polycondensation, drying, and stabilization. To strengthen the gelation and aging network, an aging process is necessary.

Removal of the remaining liquid solvent phase requires a drying process. Finally, a thermal treatment (stabilization) is often carried out to enhance the mechanical properties and to improve structural stability [30].

2.2.2. Size & Shape

TEM was performed on JEOL JEM-2100 high-resolution transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV, respectively (Fig. 2).

2.3. Sample Collection

In this experimental study, freshly extracted mandibular premolars were collected with the courtesy of the oral surgery department in the faculty of dentistry Assuit University. Sixty (60) teeth were selected for the study discarding the teeth having open apices, cracks, and resorptive or morphological defects. The teeth were washed thoroughly in running tap water to remove blood and saliva.

They were rendered free of calculus and debris using hand scalers. To avoid dehydration and consequent brittleness, the samples were stored in chloramine-T solution for 24 h followed by normal saline till used in the study within 3 months [31]. (Figs. 3, 4).

Fig. (2). Shows the TEM images of bioactive glass nanoparticles.
Fig. (3). Extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars.
Fig. (4). Extracted teeth after de-coronation.

2.4. Root Canal Preparation

Selected teeth were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction using a water-cooled diamond disc (Dica, Dendia, USA). The working length for all teeth was determined to obtain a standardized root length of 15mm. The root canals were instrumented with Protaper Ni-Ti (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) rotary instruments up to MAF# F4/.06.

Between each instrument, the root canals were irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (Clorox Co., 10th of Ramadan, Egypt) and physiologic saline alternatively using a long 27 gauge needle (Jiangsu Jichun Medical Devices Co., China). After the use of the last file, the roots were irrigated with physiological saline and dried with paper points, and thereafter, canals were irrigated with 5 mL of 17% Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA) (Glyde File Prep, DENTSPLY, Ballaigues, Switzerland) for 1 min as a rinse to remove the smear layer.

Thereafter, the roots were dried with corresponding paper points [32]. This protocol was employed for all the teeth.

2.5. Obturation

After completion of the biomechanical preparation of root canal, samples were obturated using the single cone technique. We took the best samples for the study and divided them into 3 groups. Each group had 20 (n = 20) teeth by using SEM to ignore the fault samples. Group A: Canals were obturated with gutta-percha #40/.06 along with ZnoE sealer (Endofil - PROMEDICA – Germany). Group B: Canals were obturated with Guttapercha #40/.06 along with nano calcium hydroxide sealer (NanoTech Egypt for Photo-Electronics, Al-Giza, Egypt). Group C: Canals were obturated with gutta-percha #40/.06 along with nano bioactive glass sealer (NanoTech Egypt for Photo-Electronics, Al-Giza, Egypt).

2.6. Microleakage Evaluation

Micro leakage was estimated by dye penetration test. Teeth under the experimental group were coated with two layers of nail varnish except for the last 2mm area around the apical foramen. Specimens were then immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 7 days at room temperature.

After being removed from the dye solution (Fig. 5), the specimens were washed and the nail varnish was scraped away from the root surface. The roots were then sectioned buccolingually in a longitudinal direction with a diamond disc under running water (Fig. 6).

The dye penetration was measured for each sample from the apex to the most coronal extent of the dye penetration under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification with a digital vernier caliper.

Statistical analysis of the data recorded was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) computer program (version 19 windows, SPSS, Egypt). One-way ANOVA test was used followed by post hoc test. Statistical program for the microleakage values with P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Fig. (5). Extracted teeth after removal from methylene blue dye.
Fig. (6). Sectioned teeth bucco-lingually in a longitudinal direction.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Dye Penetration Test: B

Comparison between ZnoE, nano Ca(OH)2 and nano bioactive glass sealers: Table (1), Fig. (7):

The mean and standard deviation values of sealability by dye penetration test were 2.34±0.59, 0.53±0.28, and1.2±0.84 after using ZnoE, nano Ca(OH)2, and nano bioactive glass sealers, respectively.

Nano Ca(OH)2 showed statistically significantly higher mean sealing ability (lower mean vertical apical leakage) than ZnoE and nano bioactive glass sealers (p<0.05).

Fig. (7). Bar chart representing comparison between microleakage by dye penetration test after using different sealers.

3.2. Statistical Tests:

Table (1): Means, standard deviations, and results for comparison between sealing ability by dye penetration test after using ZnoE, nano Ca(OH)2, and nano bioactive glass sealers. Vertical leakage (from apical to coronal) of specimens in each group (in mm).
  -   ZnoE   Nano
  Ca(OH)2
  Nano Bioactive Glass
  N=20   N=20   N=20
  Seal ability
  Range
  Mean ± SD
  (1.64-2.91)
  2.34±0.59
  (0.24-1.03)
  0.53±0.28
  (0.32-2.43)
  1.2±0.84

4. DISCUSSION

The main purpose of endodontic therapy is to achieve a complete hermetic seal of the root canal and prevention of coronal and apical microleakage. Sealing ability is a crucial characteristic for endodontic materials, as even if endodontic space is isolated from the oral environment with restorations, the presence of a microleakage for restorations below the enamel cement junction [33] or V class cavities [34] has been demonstrated.

Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the microleakage from the apical to coronal third by using recently introduced nano Ca(OH)2 and nano bioactive glass in comparison with traditional ZnoE sealer by using dye penetration test with methylene blue dye.

The appearance of nanotechnology, which is the study of the controlling of matter on an atomic and molecular scale, improves the properties and sealability of endodontic materials used as the active nanoparticles can penetrate the dentinal tubules and enter the accessory canals to ensure that the spaces have been sealed effectively [35].

Some of the advantages of using nanoparticles in endodontic sealers include improving their physicochemical characteristics, enhancing the antibacterial property, decreasing microleakage, and increasing biocompatibility [36].

To the best of our knowledge, the use of nanostructured materials as sealers in root canal therapy is limited to two or three types of nanostructured hydroxyapatite alone or in combination with epoxy resin (Nanoseal) [37]. Properties like antimicrobial activity, radiopacity, flow, film thickness, and cytotoxicity have been evaluated in various studies. We could not find any published reports on the sealing ability of nanomaterials as sealers in root canal therapy to make comparisons.

Nanoparticulate calcium hydroxide sealer is similar to various calcium hydroxide based sealers but it has been recently manufactured to eliminate the shortcomings of conventional calcium hydroxide, reducing the size of calcium hydroxide particles into nanoparticles enhances the penetration of this medicament into dentinal tubules and increases their antimicrobial efficacy [38, 39].

Bioactive-glass (B-G) has become a valuable adjunct to promote hard tissue healing in many clinical situations and is of particular interest for endodontic care because of its biocompatibility, regenerative and antimicrobial properties as well as chemical composition that closely resembles the mineral make-up of human bone and dentine. Nanoparticles of bioactive glass are a modification which enhances all these properties [40].

The dye penetration test is the most popular, probably because it is a simple and reliable method [41]. In this study, methylene blue dye had been considered suitable for the detection of microleakage due to having a molecular size similar to or smaller than that of bacterial products [42]. Protaper universal system was used in this study for reducing the time required for biomechanical preparation and improving the standardization of instrumentation [43].

Based on the statistically significant differences among the three canal filling materials for permanent teeth evaluated in this study, it was concluded that the overall sealers consisting of nanoparticles presented lower leakage of dye than the zinc oxide based sealer which presented the highest leakage among the tested materials. This was in agreement with Meidyawati et al., 2017 [44], who found that the MTA Fillapex sealers contain nanoparticles of MTA powders and rosins (resin), resulting in good flowability that allows penetration of the material into the main and lateral root canals and dentinal tubules.

Also with the study of Liang-Jiab BI et al., 2006 [45] which stated that the HA nanoparticles can effectively seal the exposed dentinal tubules.

A possible reason for this difference in the sealability between nanoparticles and traditional sealers was related to the size of the nanoparticles with a diameter of 100 nm or less which provided them with a greater contact surface area and charge density than bulky powders.

Penetration of sealer inside the tubules is potentially useful because it increases the interface between the core material and dentinal walls, which may improve the mechanical retention of the material via sealer plug interlocking inside the tubules [46]. It was proven that the addition of nanoparticles did not deteriorate the flow characteristics of the sealer and reduced viscosity, leading to enhanced flow of the sealer [47]. Also using nano-sized materials, the anti-leakage property of the sealer can be enhanced [48].

In the present study, ZnoE sealer allowed the highest leakage level and nano Ca(OH)2 sealer allowed the lowest leakage level of dye. This finding was found to be in agreement with Sleder et al., 1991 [49]. who found that Ca(OH)2 sealer had a sealing ability comparable to ZnoE sealer and can withstand long term exposure to tissue fluids without significant leakage.

The reason for the significant difference between the groups where Ca(OH)2 based sealers and zinc oxide eugenol based sealer were used could be that zinc oxide eugenol is water-soluble and has the disadvantage of being decomposed by water through a continuous loss of eugenol. This makes zinc oxide eugenol a weak unstable material. This is in agreement with Patel et al., 2007 [50] who proved that zinc oxide eugenol sealer in spite of its popularity as being a sealer with decades of clinical and laboratory application, is considered one of the sealers with the least penetration ability and highest leakage value. This was also in agreement with Balguerie et al., 2011 [51] who found little or no penetration of zinc oxide eugenol based sealer in the apical third of specimens.

Ca(OH)2 has been transported or mechanically forced into the dentinal tubules and thus occluded the dentinal tubules, blocking them off and decreasing dentinal permeability [52].

Nano bioactive glass sealability can be explained by the alkaline nature of bioceramic by-products reported to denature collagen fibers, which facilitates the penetration of sealers into the dentin tubules (Balguerie et al., 2011) [51].

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that synthesized nano-powder sealers exhibited less microleakage in comparison with ZOE, making them suitable for use in root canal treatment. Nevertheless, further studies should be carried out and limitations and the potential unknown risks involved in the use of nano-powders as a medical material should be considered to verify their safety.

LIST OF ABBREVIATION

EDTA Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Dr. Asmaa Ahmed Desouky had contributed to Literature search, Clinical studies, Manuscript preparation, Manuscript editing, worked as a Guarantor. Prof. Maged Mohamed Negm had contributed to study Concepts, Design, Experimental studies (Amount of dye penetration) and Manuscript review. Prof. Magdy Mohammed Ali worked on Definition of intellectual, Data analysis, and Statistical analysis. Finally, approval of the final version of the manuscript for publication was given by all authors.

ETHICAL APPROVAL CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals/humans were used for studies that are the basis of this research.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data sets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Many thanks to Prof. Yasser FathiHussien, the former head of material department, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, for continuous support and valuable discussion.

REFERENCES

1
Whitworth J. Methods of filling root canals: Principles and practices. Endod Topics 2005; 12: 2-24.
2
Antonopoulos KG, Attin T, Hellwig E. Evaluation of the apical seal of root canal fillings with different methods. J Endod 1998; 24(10): 655-8.
3
Barkhordar RA, Bui T, Watanabe L. An evaluation of sealing ability of calcium hydroxide sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68(1): 88-92.
4
Beatty RG, Vertucci FJ, Zakariasen KL. Apical sealing efficacy of endodontic obturation techniques. Int Endod J 1986; 19(5): 237-41.
5
Limkangwalmongkol S, Burtscher P, Abbott PV, Sandler AB, Bishop BM. A comparative study of the apical leakage of four root canal sealers and laterally condensed gutta-percha. J Endod 1991; 17(10): 495-9.
6
Wu MK, Ozok AR, Wesselink PR. Sealer distribution in root canals obturated by three techniques. Int Endod J 2000; 33(4): 340-5.
7
Ishley DJ, ElDeeb ME. An in vitro assessment of the quality of apical seal of thermomechanically obturated canals with and without sealer. J Endod 1983; 9(6): 242-5.
8
Strindberg LZ. Effect of an antibacterial dressing in conservative root canal treatment. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 1966; 76(2): 151-65.
9
Allen DE. Method for hermetically sealing smaller root canals. J Am Dent Assoc 1968; 76(3): 579-81.
10
Kapsimalis P, Summit NJ, Evan R. Sealing properties of endodontic materials using radioactive polar and nonpolar isotopes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod J 1966; 22: 386-92.
11
Carrotte P. Endodontics: Part 8. Filling the root canal system. Br Dent J 2004; 197(11): 667-72.
12
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: A hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod 2007; 33(4): 391-8.
13
DaSilva L, Finer Y, Friedman S, Basrani B, Kishen A. Biofilm formation within the interface of bovine root dentin treated with conjugated chitosan and sealer containing chitosan nanoparticles. J Endod 2013; 39(2): 249-53.
14
Besinis A, De Peralta T, Tredwin CJ, Handy RD. Review of nanomaterials in dentistry: Interactions with the oral micro-environment, clinical applications, hazards, and benefits. ACS Nano 2015; 9(3): 2255-89.
15
Jeevanandam J, Chan YS, Danquah MK. Biosynthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. Chem Bio Eng Reviews 2016; 3: 55-67.
16
Kulzer F, Orrit M. Single-molecule optics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2004; 55: 585-611.
17
AlKahtani RN. The implications and applications of nanotechnology in dentistry: A review. Saudi Dent J 2018; 30(2): 107-16.
18
Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J Dent 2010; 38(1): 29-38.
19
Scribante A, Massironi S, Pieraccini G, et al. Effects of nanofillers on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized with light-curing and additional postcuring. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015; 13(3): e296-9.
20
Ashraf H, Najafi F, Heidari S, Yadegary Z, Zadsirjan S. Cytotoxicity of two experimental epoxy resin-based sealers. Iran Endod J 2018; 13(2): 257-62.
21
Vollenweider M, Brunner TJ, Knecht S, et al. Remineralization of human dentin using ultrafine bioactive glass particles. Acta Biomater 2007; 3(6): 936-43.
22
Roy A, Bhattacharya J. Synthesis of Ca (OH)2 nanoparticles by wet chemical method. Micro Nano Lett J 2010; 5: 4.
23
Kavei D. Calcium hydroxide nanoparticles versus conventional calcium hydroxide a based root canal sealer. Int J Curr Res Chem Pharma Sci 2015; 2: 24-9.
24
Klein DH, Smith MD. Homogeneous nucleation of calcium hydroxide. Talanta 1968; 15(2): 229-31.
25
Tadros ME, Skalny J, Kalyoncu RSJ. Nanostructure and irreversible colloidal behavior of Ca (OH)2: Implications in cultural heritage conservation. Colloid Interface Sci 1976; 55: 20.
26
Delfort B, Born M, Chive A, Barre L. Colloidal calcium hydroxide in organic medium: Synthesis and analysis. J Coll Interf Sci 1997; 189: 151-7.
27
Nanni A, Dei L. Ca (OH)2 Nanoparticles from W/O Microemulsions. Langm J 2003; 19: 933-8.
28
Yonehara K, Shinohara M, Kanaya K. Transmission electron microscopic x-ray quantitative analysis of human dentin at 200 kV accelerating voltage. J Electron Microsc Tech 1990; 16(3): 240-8.
29
Brinker CJ, Scherer GW. Sol–gel science: The physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing 1990.
30
Hench LL, West JK. The Sol-gel process. Chem Rev 1990; 90: 33-72.
31
Al Kahtani AM. The effect of root canal sealers and timing of cementation on the microlekage of the parapost luted with resin cement. Saudi Dent J 2010; 22(2): 57-62.
32
Marcos-Arenal JL, Rivera EM, Caplan DJ, Trope M. Evaluating the paper point technique for locating the apical foramen after canal preparation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108(5): e101-5.
33
Poggio C, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Mekler J, Colombo M. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: In vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18(5): e793-8.
34
Bektas ÖÖ, Eren D, Akin GG, Sag BU, Ozcan M. Microleakage effect on class V composite restorations with two adhesive systems using different bleaching methods. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71(3-4): 1000-7.
35
Hassan N, Fayyad DM, Abo-Elezz AF, El-Fakhrani MY. The sealability of mineral trioxide aggregate and nano hydroxyapatite retrograde filling material on internal apical bacterial leakage of infected root canal (an in-vitro study). Med J Cairo Univ 2016; 84: 113-7.
36
Alenazy MS, Mosadomi HA, Al-Nazhan S, Rayyan MR. Clinical considerations of nanobiomaterials in endodontics: A systematic review. Saud Endod J 2018; 8: 163-9.
37
Javidi M, Zarei M, Naghavi N, Mortazavi M, Nejat AH. Zinc oxide nano-particles as sealer in endodontics and its sealing ability. Contemp Clin Dent 2014; 5(1): 20-4.
38
Dianat O, Azadnia S, Mozayeni MA. Toxicity of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles on murine fibroblast cell line. Iran Endod J 2015; 10(1): 49-54.
39
Kavei D. Calcium hydroxide nanoparticles versus conventional calcium hydroxide a based root canal sealer. Int. J Curr Res Chem Pharma Sci 2015; 2: 24-9.
40
Profeta AC, Prucher GM. Bioactive glass in Endodontic therapy and associated microsurgery. Open Dent J 2017; 11: 164-70.
41
Conrado AL, Munin E, Frosi IM, Zângaro RA. Root apex sealing with different filling materials photopolymerized with fiber optic-delivered argon laser light. Lasers Med Sci 2004; 19(2): 95-9.
42
Kubo CH, Gomes APM, Mancini MNG. In vitro evaluation of apical sealing in root apex treated with demineralization agents and retrofiled with mineral trioxide aggregate through marginal dye leakage. Braz Dent J 2005; 16(3): 187-91.
43
Aguiar CM, Mendes DdeA, Câmara AC, Figueiredo AP. Assessment of canal walls after biomechanical preparation of root canals instrumented with Protaper Universal rotary system. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17(6): 590-5.
44
Meidyawati R, Suprastiwi E. Comparison sealing ability of MTA sealer and resin epoxy sealer. J Int Dent Med Res 2017; 10: 134-8.
45
Liang-Jiab BI, Hong LL. Lai- Fal IU. Mutual adsorption of Hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and sealing effect of HA micro-particles on dentinal tubules. J Oral Sci Res 2006; 5: 31-3.
46
White RR, Goldman M, Lin PS. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by plastic filling materials. J Endod 1984; 10(12): 558-62.
47
Kishen A, Shi Z, Shrestha A, Neoh KG. An investigation on the antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of cationic nanoparticulates for root canal disinfection. J Endod 2008; 34(12): 1515-20.
48
Nazila A, Mohammadian F, Nazari MA, Nobar BR. Applications of nanotechnology in endodontic: A review. Nanomed J 2018; 5: 121-6.
49
Sleder FS, Ludlow MO, Bohacek JR. Long-term sealing ability of a calcium hydroxide sealer. J Endod 1991; 17(11): 541-3.
50
Patel DV, Sherriff M, Ford TR, Watson TF, Mannocci F. The penetration of realseal primer and tubliseal into root canal dentinal tubules: A confocal microscopic study. Int Endod J 2007; 40(1): 67-71.
51
Balguerie E, van der Sluis L, Vallaeys K, Gurgel-Georgelin M, Diemer F. Sealer penetration and adaptation in the dentinal tubules: A scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2011; 37(11): 1576-9.
52
Kim SK, Kim YO. Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal medication on apical seal. Int Endod J 2002; 35(7): 623-8.