Clinical Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth - Results of 2.5 Year Follow-up



Johanna Tanner1, 4, Mimmi Tolvanen2, Sufyan Garoushi3, 4, *, Eija Säilynoja3, 5
1 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
2 Department of Community Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
3 Department of Biomaterials Science, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
4 Turku Clinical Biomaterials Center – TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
5 Research, Development and Production Department, Stick Tech LTD – Member of GC Group, Turku, Finland


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
13
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 596
Abstract HTML Views: 135
PDF Downloads: 118
ePub Downloads: 39
Total Views/Downloads: 888
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 361
Abstract HTML Views: 99
PDF Downloads: 101
ePub Downloads: 38
Total Views/Downloads: 599



Creative Commons License
© 2018 Tanner et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to the author at the Department of Biomaterials Science, Institute of Dentistry and TCBC, University of Turku, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland; Tel: +358 233338379; E-mail: sufgar@utu.fi


Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior composite restorations reinforced by bulk base of short-fiber composite (everX Posterior, GC Corporation).

Methods:

Thirty-six short fiber-reinforced composite restorations were placed in premolar and molar teeth of 33 patients. Eight of the teeth were vital and 28 were non-vital. Average follow up time of the restorations was 30.6 months (2.5 years), ranging from 16.2 to 51.3 months (1.3 - 4.3 years).

Results:

One restoration failed during the follow-up period due to secondary caries, at time point 39.5 months. Three fillings had minor fractures during the follow-up. The overall survival rate of the restorations was 97.2% and success rate (no maintenance needed) was 88.9%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Posterior composite restorations with a bulk base of short-fiber composite showed good clinical performance in the short term evaluation.

Keywords: Fiber-reinforced composites, Bilayered posterior composite restorations, Clinical study, Polymerization shrinkage, Cavities, Volumetric shrinkage.