Effect of Flask Closure Method and Post-Pressing Time on the Displacement of Maxillary Denture Teeth

Wagner A Negreiros1, Rafael L.X Consani1, *, Marcelo F Mesquita1, Mario A.C Sinhoreti2, Ivan R Faria3
1 Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
2 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
3 Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, Sao Paulo State University, Araraquara, SP, Brazil

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 414
Abstract HTML Views: 136
PDF Downloads: 71
Total Views/Downloads: 621
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 220
Abstract HTML Views: 102
PDF Downloads: 62
Total Views/Downloads: 384

Creative Commons License
© Negreiros et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba – UNICAMP, Av. Limeira, 901, 13414-903 - Piracicaba, SP, Brazil; E-mail:


The purpose of this study was to verify the influence of flask closure methods and post-pressing times on tooth displacement in maxillary dentures. Twenty similar maxillary dentures were made using a heat-polymerized acrylic resin, and randomly assigned to 4 experimental groups (n=5) according to the protocol: 1-conventional flask closure and immediate polymerization; 2- conventional flask closure and polymerization after 6-hour post-pressing time; 3- RS flask closure system and immediate polymerization; and 4- RS flask closure system and polymerization after 6-hour post-pressing time. Three transverse and 2 anteroposterior linear distances between teeth were measured before and after the denture processing with an optical microscope with accuracy of 0.0005mm. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test were performed to compare the results. The 6-hour post-pressing time (conventional = 0.44mm and RS = 0.33mm) showed no statistically significant difference in tooth movement, in relation to the flask closure methods, when compared to the immediate time (conventional = 0.40mm and RS = 0.28mm). The RS system standardized the tooth displacement, independently of the post-pressing times. Dimensional changes were more uniform when the dentures were submitted to the 6-hour post-pressing time and RS flask closure method, suggesting that these factors may reduce the magnitude of tooth movement.

Key Words: Denture tooth, flask closure, tooth movement, complete maxillary denture.