CORRECTION


Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers



Fernanda Faot*, Leonardo H V Panza, Renata C M Rodrigues Garcia, Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury
Rua Gonçalves Chaves, 457, 2nd floor, Pelotas - RS – Brazil, Zip Code: 96015560 / Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 3035
Abstract HTML Views: 1069
PDF Downloads: 487
Total Views/Downloads: 4591
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1250
Abstract HTML Views: 629
PDF Downloads: 376
Total Views/Downloads: 2255



Creative Commons License
© Faot et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Rua Gonçalves Chaves, 457, 2nd floor, Pelotas - RS – Brazil, Zip Code: 96015560 / Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil; Tel: +55 53 32226690; Fax: +55 53 32226690; E-mails: fernanda.faot@ufpel.tche.br,fernanda.faot@gmail.com


Abstract

Objectives:

This study evaluated the impact and flexural strength and analyzed the fracture behavior of acrylic resins.

Methods:

Eighteen rectangular specimens were fabricated of Lucitone 550, QC 20 (both unreinforced acrylic resins), Impact 1500 (extra strength impact), Impact 2000 (high impact) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The impact strength was evaluated in notched specimens (50x6x4mm) and flexural strength in unotched (64x10x3.3mm), using three-point bending test, as well as, stress at yield, Young modulus and displacement at yield. Fragments from mechanical tests were observed by SEM. Data from impact strength, stress at yield and displacement at yield were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). Young modulus values were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Dunnett T3 multiple comparisons test (α=0.05).

Results:

Mean values of impact strength and stress at yield values were higher (P<.005) for Impact 2000 while Young modulus was higher (P<.05) for Lucitone 550; Impact 1500 and Impact 2000 showed significant values (P<.05) in the displacement at yield. Impact fractures of the all acrylic resins were brittle. Bending fractures of Lucitone 550 and Impact 2000 were brittle, QC 20 fractures were ductile and Impact 1500 showed brittle (75%) and ductile (25%) fractures.

Conclusion:

Within the limitations of this study, the Impact 2000 showed improved mechanical properties with high capacity of stress absorption and energy dissipation before the fracture.

Keywords: Acrylic resins, high impact, impact strength, stress at yield, fracture morphology, fracture microstructure, deformation behavior, fracture process, brittle fracture, ductile fracture, cross-linking agents.