Antibacterial Activity of Curcumin-loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Antibacterial Activity of Curcumin-loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans

The Open Dentistry Journal 21 Apr 2025 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/0118742106376577250411061351

Abstract

Background

Streptococcus mutans is an important contributor to tooth decay. Curcumin exhibits minimal side effects and has broad applications in various antimicrobial research. Although curcumin derivatives have a wide range of medical effects, their inherent physicochemical parameters, such as poor water solubility, chemical instability, low bioavailability, short half-life, and rapid metabolism, make their medicinal use challenging. Nanoparticle drug delivery systems can enhance the efficacy of curcumin in treating several diseases, especially infectious diseases.

Aims

This present study aimed to investigate the antibacterial effect of curcumin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Cur-MSNs) on S. mutans and their biofilm form and adhesion.

Objectives

Recently, novel approaches have been utilized to overcome pharmacological issues and increase the therapeutic effectiveness of curcumin. Among them, nanoformulation has been reported as an innovative and developing technology to overcome these limitations.

Methods

In the present study, the antibacterial, biofilm inhibitory, and anti-adherence activities of free curcumin, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), and Cur-MSNs were assessed against S. mutans.

Results

The results showed that Cur-MSNs demonstrated more antibacterial effects against S. mutans than free curcumin and MSNs (p<0.05). The MICs spectrum of Cur-MSNs, free curcumin, and MSNs was 128 µg/mL, 512 µg/mL, and 1024 µg/mL, respectively. The biofilm inhibitory effect of Cur-MSNs was 32 times more than free curcumin (p<0.05). The bacteria adhesion after 12 hours in Cur-MSNs was significantly reduced compared with free curcumin and MSNs.

Conclusion

The antibacterial activity of curcumin increased by its nanoformulation. These results indicated that Cur-MSNs possess potential anti-cariogenic and anti-plaque properties, warranting further investigation through in vivo experiments and clinical studies.

Keywords: Curcumin, Mesoporous silica nanoparticles, Antimicrobial effects, Antibacterial properties, Streptococcus mutans, Biofilm.

1. INTRODUCTION

Streptococcus mutans inhabits the human oral cavity and is known as one of the main causes of caries [1, 2]. S. mutans attaches to surfaces and then colonizes the oral cavity, and creates biofilms [3]. Dental bacterial biofilm is a mass of biofilm-forming bacteria, and the bacterial pheno-type in the biofilm form is different from its planktonic form [4]. The dental biofilm bacteria are much less sensitive to adverse growth conditions, such as biocide agents and hydrodynamic shear forces [5, 6]. Curcumin is a natural, yellow-orange, low molecular weight polyphenol compound found in the root of the plant Curcuma longa, which is used in the management of diabetes, wound healing, and treatment of cardiovascular diseases [7-9].

Different investigations reported that curcumin is a potential herbal antibacterial agent against drug-resistant bacteria [10]. Furthermore, curcumin is effective against oral bacteria which is related to dental and oral diseases [11]. One study demonstrated that curcumin could prevent the adherence of S. mutans [10], while another reported that curcumin could inhibit the activity of sortase A in S. mutans, thereby exerting anti-adhesive effects that may contribute to the prevention of dental caries [12]. Moreover, blue light-activated curcumin can photoin-activate the planktonic form of S. mutans, but its effects on the biofilm form of S. mutans are weak [13]. For these reasons, this research aims to determine the potential application of curcumin as an herbal antimicrobial agent and highlights the importance of investigating how curcumin performs on dental and oral bacteria.

Curcumin is very safe for use in animals and humans and has low toxicity even at high doses [14]. However, its low bioavailability, poor stability, and low solubility, along with a short half-life, have limited the clinical usage of curcumin [15, 16]. To overcome these limitations, nano-formulation has been introduced as an advanced technology [17-20].

Curcumin nanomaterials have shown greater thera-peutic results than free curcumin in various in vitro and in vivo investigations. Drug delivery through nanoparticles can enhance the efficacy of curcumin in several diseases, especially infections [21-24].

Various recent research works have focused on the application of silica nanoparticles as carriers [25]. Proper-ties of inorganic silica, such as topology, surface area, and size, can be modified to generate distinct interactions with different types of biological systems [26]. Furthermore, mesoporous silica has advantageous properties, such as high pore volume, large surface area, and tunable pore morphological structures, which make it suitable for use as a nanocarrier [27]. In the case of encapsulating pro-drugs in organic nanoparticles, the rapid decomposition of the organic material leads to the fast release of the drugs. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) allow for the prolonged release of drugs compared to organic nano-particles because the drugs are trapped inside the nanopores [28, 29]. MSNs can load natural agents, such as curcumin, to exert significant antimicrobial actions [30, 31].

Despite progress in dental care, caries remain an important health concern. Sometimes, traditional agents often fail to eradicate bacteria, leading to persistent infections and resistance. Loading curcumin in MSNs can increase its delivery and efficacy against caries-causing bacteria. This study addresses the research gap by eva-luating the antibacterial efficacy of curcumin-containing MSNs against S. mutans, thereby providing a novel and effective strategy to improve dental health and combat caries. The present study aims to investigate the antibacterial effect and biofilm inhibition of curcumin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Cur-MSNs) against S. mutans. In addition, it investigates the impact of Cur-MSNs on the adhesion of S. mutans to surfaces.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. The Antibacterial Activity

In our previous study, Cur-MSNs were prepared via a chemical precipitation technique and then were physico-chemically characterized [32]. For the preparation of Cur-MSNs, 1000 mg of MSNs powder (Temadkala, Iran) and curcumin (Sigma Aldrich, USA) (100 mg) were suspended in 50 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) via ultrasonication. Then, the prepared suspension was stirred for 24 h and centrifuged at 17,000 rpm for 30 min. The resulting Cur-MSNs precipitates were washed with ethanol and dried in an oven [32].

The average particle size of Cur-MSNs was 92 nm. The pattern of XRD showed that Cur-MSN had a mesoporous structure related to the MCM-41 family. TEM image demonstrated rod-shaped mesoporous nanoparticles. The curcumin loading efficiency in MSNs was 82% [32].

The antimicrobial effects of compounds and controls were studied on S. mutans ATCC 35668. All steps were repeated three times. The antibacterial effect of free curcumin and Cur-MSNs was assessed using the broth microdilution method to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol [33]. Serial two-fold dilutions of free curcumin, MSNs, and Cur-MSNs were prepared in varying concentrations and added to a bacterial suspension (0.5 McFarland) in BHI broth, followed by incubation at 37°C for 24 hours. The control contained only broth medium inoculated with bacteria and was incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. The MIC value was considered the lowest concentration of Cur-MSNs, MSNs, and free curcumin, which completely inhibited S. mutans growth as detected by the naked eye.

2.2. Inhibitory Activity on Biofilm

The minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) was evaluated for MSNs, free curcumin, and Cur-MSNs. In the first step, 0.1 mL of bacteria suspension (0.5 McFarland) and 0.1 mL of TSB were added to the microplate wells. To stimulate biofilm production, TSB containing 0.25% glucose was added to the microplate and maintained in an incubator at 35 °C for 24 hours. Then, serial concentrations of MSNs, Cur-MSNs, and free curcumin were added and incubated for 24 hours at 35 °C. In the next step, the content of the wells was removed and washed with sterile water. The OD of the wells was read at a wavelength of 650 nm before and after incubation at 35°C for 6 h. The biofilm inhibitory concentration is defined as the lowest concentration of an antibacterial agent, which results in an OD650 nm difference of ≤10% from the mean OD of the two positive control wells [34].

2.3. Bacterial Attachment

The 0.5 MIC as sub-inhibitory concentrations were used to evaluate the inhibitory action of Cur-MSNs, MSNs, and free curcumin on biofilm formation. Fresh TSB (1:20) with and without the mentioned substances was used to dilute the overnight bacterial culture. Then, the bacterial sus-pension was added to the wells and incubated at 35 °C. After 24 hours, the content of the wells was removed, and the generated biofilms were rinsed with sterile water and methanol used for fixing them. The wells were then allowed to dry and stained with crystal violet solution. The 33% acetic acid was used for biofilm dissolution. Lastly, the OD of the wells was read at 492 nm. Wells containing TSB without bacteria were used as negative controls.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA and t-test were carried out to calculate the antibacterial and antibiofilm effects. The significance level of p<0.05 was considered. To assess the normality of data, we conducted normality tests on the antimicrobial effect data for each compound and control group (MSNs, curcumin, and Cur-MSNs). Specifically, we carried out the Shapiro-Wilk test due to its robustness for small sample sizes.

3. RESULTS

Cur-MSNs exhibited an antibacterial effect on S. mutans, which was more pronounced than free curcumin and MSNs (p<0.05) (Fig. 1). The MICs spectrum of MSNs, free curcumin, and Cur-MSNs was 1024 µg/mL, 512 µg/mL and 128 µg/mL, respectively.

The biofilm inhibitory effect of Cur-MSNs was 32 times greater than that of curcumin (p<0.05) (Fig. 2).

The adhesion of bacteria to surfaces was assessed to evaluate the effect of Cur-MSNs at sub-MIC levels (0.5 MIC). The adhesion of bacteria after 12 hours in Cur-MSNs was significantly reduced compared with free curcumin, MSNs, and control (grown of bacteria without any treatment) (Fig. 3).

In the present study, it was found that Cur-MSNs decreased attachment of S. mutans at sub-MIC levels (p<0.05).

Fig. (1).

The inhibitory effects of MSNs, curcumin, and Cur-MSNs on S. mutans. (*) and (**) indicate p ≤0.05 compared with MSNs and curcumin, respectively.

Fig. (2).

The bacterial biofilm inhibition of MSNs, free curcumin, and Cur-MSNs. (*) and (**) indicate p≤0.05 compared with MSNs and curcumin, respectively.

Fig. (3).

Effect of free curcumin, MSNs, and Cur-MSNs on the bacterial attachment to the plastic surface. (#), (*) and (**) and indicate p≤0.05 compared with control, MSNs and curcumin, respectively.

4. DISCUSSION

Nanoparticles containing drugs may interact with bacteria by two probable mechanisms: one, nanoparticles may integrate with bacterial cells' surface to raise the permeability to antibacterial agents, and the other, nanoparticles may be absorbed by the cell wall of bacteria and act as a reservoir for the antibacterial agent release [35].

Cur-MSNs exhibited an antibacterial effect on S. mutans, which was more significant than free curcumin and MSNs (p<0.05). The antibacterial effects of curcumin on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were also confirmed. Cheng et al. prepared core-shell magnetic MSNs bonded to intermittent mesoporous periodic organic silica with different loading properties. Curcumin and gentamicin were separately loaded into the hydrophobic and hydrophilic spaces, respectively, to create a dual-function antibacterial and anticancer nanoformulation [36].

A trio-hybrid nanocomposite of MSNs containing curcu-min and copper and decorated with nanoparticles of Ag showed the photokilling effect against E. coli [37]. In a study, a nanocomposite of curcumin-loaded MSNs and chito-san was produced and showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli in the disc diffusion test [38].

Li and coworkers prepared a hybrid hemostatic organic-inorganic material via the electrospinning method by incorporating the MSNs containing curcumin into PVP nanofibers. They showed increased antibacterial effects by hybrid nanofibers against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in vitro [39].

Curcumin nanoformulations improved the antimicrobial effect of bulk curcumin against different microbes [40, 41]. Negahdari and coworkers prepared nanocrystals of curcumin and investigated their effects against Entero-coccus faecalis, S. aureus, and E. coli inside the implant fixture. Curcumin nanocrystals decreased bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) significantly (p<0.01) over the incu-bation period [24]. Maleki Dizaj and coworkers evaluated the effect of curcumin nanocrystals against Porphyromonas gingivalis, which showed MBC of 12.5 μg/mL and MIC of 6.25 μg/mL [42].

Antibacterial drugs can affect the bacteria in planktonic form but may not be effective against the biofilm form of the same bacteria [43]. Sometimes, eradication of biofilm is difficult as a result of its antibacterial resistance. Removing the infected tissues or devices is critical for eradicating biofilm-associated infections that may be inconvenient or impossible in some cases. The usage of a suitable delivery system for antimicrobial agents can help eradicate biofilms [44]. Hence, the use of nanoformulations can increase the sensitivity of biofilms to antimicrobial agents [45]. In this study, curcumin and Cur-MSNs inhibited the biofilm formation of S. mutans (p<0.05). The biofilm inhibitory effect of Cur-MSNs was 32 times more pronounced than that of curcumin (p<0.05).

The attachment of bacteria is an important factor for their colonization on surfaces. In the present study, it was found that Cur-MSNs decreased attachment of S. mutans at sub-MIC levels (p<0.05).

Pamukçu et al. prepared curcumin-loaded hyper-branched polyethylenimine-grafted mesoporous silica nano-particles (F-MSN-PEI/Cur) and investigated their antibiofilm activity on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. It was found that F-MSN-PEI/Cur inhibited biofilm formation and induced biofilm eradication [46].

Barros et al. synthesized curcumin-conjugated silica nano-particles, which were able to hinder the biofilm formation of model P. putida by up to 50% and disrupt mature biofilms by up to 54% [47].

CONCLUSION

Silica nanoparticles containing herbal agents with extraordinary advantages, such as cost-effective prepara-tion and exceptional biocompatibility, can be utilized as promising nanoformulations for the treatment of infec-tions. However, more evidence is required to prove the safety and therapeutic efficiency of MSNs, highlighting the need for extensive research before drug-loaded MSN systems can be translated to clinical applications. Critical evaluation of clinical data on side effects has reported that herbal drugs are usually better tolerated than synthetic drugs. Nevertheless, potentially serious complications, including plant interactions, have been described. This requires vigilance when using herbal medicines, especially in certain situations, such as the pediatric population and during pregnancy.

This study demonstrated the antibacterial effect of curcumin nanocrystals against S. mutants in vitro, which could have anti-caries and anti-plaque effects. However, the clinical use of Cur-MSNs may be challenged by issues, such as toxicity, stability in the oral environment, and scalability of the production process. To ensure the biocompatibility of these nanoparticles and their safe use in humans, it is necessary to conduct further additional studies.

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors confirm their contribution to the paper: S.S. and S.M.D.: Study conception and design; M.Y.M.: Data collection; M.Y.M., S.S., and S.M.D.: Analysis and interpretation of results; S.M. and M.Y.M.: Draft manuscript. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

ETHICAL APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This study was approved (Ethical code: IR.TBZMED.DENTISTRY.REC.1403.044) by the Ethics Committee of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

Not applicable.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

FUNDING

This study was funded by the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences with grant number 75293.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Simin Sharifi is on the editorial advisory board of the journal TODENTJ.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (No. 75293).

REFERENCES

1
Bowen WH, Koo H. Biology of streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: Role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms. Caries Res 2011; 45(1): 69-86.
2
Smith EG, Spatafora GA. Gene regulation in S. mutans: Complex control in a complex environment. J Dent Res 2012; 91(2): 133-41.
3
Krzyściak W, Jurczak A, Kościelniak D, Bystrowska B, Skalniak A. The virulence of Streptococcus mutans and the ability to form biofilms. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33(4): 499-515.
4
Merritt J, Kreth J, Qi F, Sullivan R, Shi W. Non-disruptive, real-time analyses of the metabolic status and viability of Streptococcus mutans cells in response to antimicrobial treatments. J Microbiol Methods 2005; 61(2): 161-70.
5
Huang R, Li M, Gregory RL. Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm. Virulence 2011; 2(5): 435-44.
6
Utsumi R. Bacterial signal transduction: Networks and drug targets 2008; 1-9.
7
Sharifi S, Fathi N, Memar MY, et al. Anti‐microbial activity of curcumin nanoformulations: New trends and future perspectives. Phytother Res 2020; 34(8): 1926-46.
8
Samiei M, Abedi A, Sharifi S, Dizaj MS. Early osteogenic differentiation stimulation of dental pulp stem cells by calcitriol and curcumin. Stem Cells Int 2021; 2021: 1-7.
9
Dizaj MS, Alipour M, Abdolahinia DE, et al. Curcumin nanoformulations: Beneficial nanomedicine against cancer. Phytother Res 2022; 36(3): 1156-81.
10
Song J, Choi B, Jin EJ, Yoon Y, Choi KH. Curcumin suppresses Streptococcus mutans adherence to human tooth surfaces and extracellular matrix proteins. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 31(7): 1347-52.
11
Li B, Li X, Lin H, Zhou Y. Curcumin as a promising antibacterial agent: Effects on metabolism and biofilm formation in S. mutans. BioMed Res Int 2018; 2018(1): 1-11.
12
Hu P, Huang P, Chen MW. Curcumin reduces Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation by inhibiting sortase A activity. Arch Oral Biol 2013; 58(10): 1343-8.
13
Hu P, Huang P, Chen WM. Curcumin inhibits the Sortase A activity of the Streptococcus mutans UA159. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2013; 171(2): 396-402.
14
Soleimani V, Sahebkar A, Hosseinzadeh H. Turmeric ( Curcuma longa ) and its major constituent (curcumin) as nontoxic and safe substances: Review. Phytother Res 2018; 32(6): 985-95.
15
Prasad S, Tyagi AK, Aggarwal BB. Recent developments in delivery, bioavailability, absorption and metabolism of curcumin: The golden pigment from golden spice. Cancer Res Treat 2014; 46(1): 2-18.
16
Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, Aggarwal BB. Bioavailability of curcumin: Problems and promises. Mol Pharm 2007; 4(6): 807-18.
17
Rafiee Z, Nejatian M, Daeihamed M, Jafari SM. Application of curcumin-loaded nanocarriers for food, drug and cosmetic purposes. Trends Food Sci Technol 2019; 88: 445-58.
18
Sharifi S, Khosroshahi ZA, Dizaj MS, Rezaei Y. Preparation, physicochemical assessment and the antimicrobial action of hydroxyapatite–gelatin/curcumin nanofibrous composites as a dental biomaterial. Biomimetics (Basel) 2021; 7(1): 4.
19
Memar MY, Yekani M, Sharifi S, Dizaj SM. Antibacterial and biofilm inhibitory effects of rutin nanocrystals. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 2022; 13(2): 132.
20
Hamidi A, Sharifi S, Davaran S, Ghasemi S, Omidi Y, Rashidi M-R. Novel aldehyde-terminated dendrimers; synthesis and cytotoxicity assay. Bioimpacts 2012; 2(2): 97-103.
21
Yallapu MM, Jaggi M, Chauhan SC. Curcumin nanoformulations: A future nanomedicine for cancer. Drug Discov Today 2012; 17(1-2): 71-80.
22
Yallapu MM, Jaggi M, Chauhan SC. Curcumin nanomedicine: A road to cancer therapeutics. Curr Pharm Des 2013; 19(11): 1994-2010.
23
Negahdari R, Ghavimi MA, Barzegar A, et al. Antibacterial effect of nanocurcumin inside the implant fixture: An in vitro study. Clin Exp Dent Res 2021; 7(2): 163-9.
24
Negahdari R, Sharifi S, Ghavimi MA, et al. Curcumin nanocrystals: Production, physicochemical assessment, and in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial effects against bacterial loading of the implant fixture. Appl Sci 2020; 10(23): 8356.
25
Li Z, Barnes JC, Bosoy A, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 2012; 41(7): 2590-605.
26
Zhou Y, Quan G, Wu Q, et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B 2018; 8(2): 165-77.
27
Kankala RK, Han YH, Na J, et al. Nanoarchitectured structure and surface biofunctionality of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Adv Mater 2020; 32(23): 1907035.
28
Vallet-Regí M, Colilla M, Izquierdo-Barba I, Manzano M. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery: Current insights. Molecules 2017; 23(1): 47.
29
Memar MY, Yekani M, Ghanbari H, Shahi S, Sharifi S, Dizaj MS. Biocompatibility, cytotoxicity and antibacterial effects of meropenem-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2020; 48(1): 1354-61.
30
Raza A, Sime FB, Cabot PJ, Maqbool F, Roberts JA, Falconer JR. Solid nanoparticles for oral antimicrobial drug delivery: A review. Drug Discov Today 2019; 24(3): 858-66.
31
Dizaj MS, Sharifi S, Tavakoli F, et al. Curcumin-Loaded silica nanoparticles: Applications in infectious disease and food industry. Nanomaterials 2022; 12(16): 2848.
32
Sharifi S, Abdolahinia DE, Ghavimi MA, et al. Effect of curcumin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles on the head and neck cancer cell line, HN5. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2022; 44(11): 5247-59.
33
Weinstein MP. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically 2018; 1-8.
34
Ghorbani H, Memar MY, Sefidan FY, Yekani M, Ghotaslou R. In vitro synergy of antibiotic combinations against planktonic and biofilm Pseudomonas aeruginosa. GMS Hyg Infect Control 2017; 12: Doc17.
35
Samiei M, Farjami A, Dizaj SM, Lotfipour F. Nanoparticles for antimicrobial purposes in Endodontics: A systematic review of in vitro studies. Mater Sci Eng C 2016; 58: 1269-78.
36
Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Deng W, Hu J. Antibacterial and anticancer activities of asymmetric lollipop-like mesoporous silica nanoparticles loaded with curcumin and gentamicin sulfate. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2020; 186: 110744.
37
Kuthati Y, Kankala RK, Busa P, et al. Phototherapeutic spectrum expansion through synergistic effect of mesoporous silica trio-nanohybrids against antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacterium. J Photochem Photobiol B 2017; 169: 124-33.
38
Wu C, Zhu Y, Wu T, et al. Enhanced functional properties of biopolymer film incorporated with curcurmin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles for food packaging. Food Chem 2019; 288: 139-45.
39
Li D, Nie W, Chen L, et al. Fabrication of curcumin-loaded mesoporous silica incorporated polyvinyl pyrrolidone nanofibers for rapid hemostasis and antibacterial treatment. RSC Advances 2017; 7(13): 7973-82.
40
Wang Y, Lu Z, Wu H, Lv F. Study on the antibiotic activity of microcapsule curcumin against foodborne pathogens. Int J Food Microbiol 2009; 136(1): 71-4.
41
Bhawana , Basniwal RK, Buttar HS, Jain VK, Jain N. Curcumin nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial study. J Agric Food Chem 2011; 59(5): 2056-61.
42
Dizaj MS, Shokrgozar H, Yazdani J, Memar MY, Sharifi S, Ghavimi MA. Antibacterial effects of curcumin nanocrystals against Porphyromonas gingivalis isolated from patients with implant failure. Clin Pract 2022; 12(5): 809-17.
43
Sun F, Qu F, Ling Y, et al. Biofilm-associated infections: Antibiotic resistance and novel therapeutic strategies. Future Microbiol 2013; 8(7): 877-86.
44
Wu H, Moser C, Wang HZ, Høiby N, Song ZJ. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections. Int J Oral Sci 2015; 7(1): 1-7.
45
Hwang I, Hwang JH, Choi H, Kim KJ, Lee DG. Synergistic effects between silver nanoparticles and antibiotics and the mechanisms involved. J Med Microbiol 2012; 61(12): 1719-26.
46
Pamukçu A, Erdoğan N, Karaman SD. Polyethylenimine‐grafted mesoporous silica nanocarriers markedly enhance the bactericidal effect of curcumin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2022; 110(11): 2506-20.
47
Barros CHN, Devlin H, Hiebner DW, Vitale S, Quinn L, Casey E. Enhancing curcumin’s solubility and antibiofilm activity via silica surface modification. Nanoscale Adv 2020; 2(4): 1694-708.