Stability and Cytotoxicity Assessments of Hypericum Perforatum Nanoemulsion in Preventing Denture-related Stomatitis
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Stability and Cytotoxicity Assessments of Hypericum Perforatum Nanoemulsion in Preventing Denture-related Stomatitis

The Open Dentistry Journal 06 Jun 2024 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/0118742106308988240525165932

Abstract

Background

There is a growing interest in natural antimicrobials based on herbs, which can be used to prevent and treat oral and dental infections.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability and the cytotoxicity of a Hypericum perforatum nanoemulsion used to prevent denture-related stomatitis.

Methods

The ultrasonic method was used to prepare a Hypericum perforatum nanoemulsion. The prepared nanoemulsion was then characterized using conventional methods. The emulsion resistance to centrifugation was studied, and the formulation was kept at room temperature for 2 months, and any phase separation was checked. Besides, the changes in droplet diameter, polydispersity index (PDI), and surface charge were compared at different time intervals. Finally, the cytotoxicity test was conducted to determine the toxicity of the prepared nanoemulsion against human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).

Results

The prepared nanoemulsion demonstrated proper physicochemical properties with no cytotoxicity against HGFs. The droplet size, PDI, and surface charge of the nanoemulsion showed a slight increase after 30 days (P=0.6). After 60 days, the increase in the droplet size, PDI, and surface charge were significant (P=0.03). However, the droplet size was still preserved below 200 nm, and the PDI was less than 0.7. Nanoemulsion also showed no physical changes or phase separation after centrifugation and two months of keeping at different temperatures.

Conclusion

The prepared nanoemulsion can be used to prevent and treat oral and dental infectious diseases like denture-related stomatitis.

Keywords: Hypericum perforatum, Nanoemulsion, Stability, Stomatitis, Cytotoxicity, Natural antimicrobials.

1. INTRODUCTION

Despite the rapid advances in the technology of polymers, polymethyl methacrylate is still the most common material in prosthetics [1]. Indeed, the main and perhaps economical material to replace teeth is polymethyl methacrylate [2]. Over time, despite the improvement in the mechanical and chemical properties, a large number of incidences regarding microbial and fungal growth have been reported due to dental acryls [3]. Therefore, the antimicrobial and fungal properties of dental acryls have been given great importance [4].

Denture-related stomatitis is among the common infections of acrylate resins, which are in the form of mouth sores with diffuse inflammation (mostly in the maxillary areas) [5]. In more than 70 percent of cases, stomatitis is associated with Candia albicans, and common treatments for Candida albicans have short-term effects and are a definitive treatment for patients [6].

Medicinal treatments for denture-related stomatitis include nystatin, amphotericin B (in more severe cases), fluconazole, and chlorhexidine [6, 7]. However, due to the increasing number of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the side effects of chemical drugs, the use of medicinal herbs and herbal extracts has increased [8].

There is a growing interest in natural antimicrobial and fungal agents based on medicinal herbs, which can be used to prevent and treat infectious diseases, especially when AMR (Antimicrobial Multi Resistance) threatens human and animal health globally [9]. Natural and environmentally friendly antimicrobial materials are harmless to humans and other organisms, do not cause environmental pollution, and are economically viable [10]. These materials have different mechanisms for fighting the microorganism, including preventing the construction of cell walls and neoclassical acids and inhibiting proteinization and changes in cell membrane function [11]. The clinical effectiveness of plant-based materials in the management of denture stomatitis was suggested by Tatapudi et al. [12].

Hypericum perforatum is herbaceous and perennial and belongs to the Clusiaceae family, which is used in common medicine and herbal therapy due to its antiseptic effects [13]. It has also been found to have anti-bacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic activities [14]. Its extract contains flavonoids and phenolic acids, which show the activity of inhibiting free radicals [15]. The efficacy of Hypericum perforatum extract was reported on recurrent aphthous ulcers by Motallebnejad et al. [16]. Moreover, the findings of Antoniadou et al. suggested a promising avenue for Hypericum perforatum in the progress of new antimicrobial plans against oral diseases [17].

Nanomaterials, such as nanoemulsions, provide many benefits in antimicrobial materials, such as reducing antimicrobial use, increasing efficiency, high adaptability to the environment, and improving quality [18]. Research previously conducted to address this problem has included the use of silver nanoparticles for acryl. Acryls containing silver nanoparticles exerted a stronger antifungal effect on standard Candida albicans and had less effect on hospital strains [19].

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability and cytotoxicity of a Hypericum perforatum nanoemulsion used to prevent denture-related stomatitis.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Preparation of Hypericum Perforatum Nanoemulsion

Tween 80 (2% w/w, Sigma Ultra, low peroxide) was slowly added to Hypericum perforatum oil (4% w/w, Barij Esans Co, Tehran, Iran) and stirred at 1000 rpm. Then, distilled water (Takrou, Tehran, Iran) was added slowly to the mixture, and the mixture was stirred for 10 minutes to form initial droplets. The coarse droplet of the emulsion was then converted to nanometer dimensions by an ultrasonic device (Tomey, Erlangen, Germany, 400 W, 20 KHz) [20].

2.2. Droplet Size and the Polydispersion Index (PDI)

The droplet diameter and PDI of the prepared nanoemulsion were studied using the dynamic light scattering device (DLS, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). For this purpose, a milliliter of the nanoemulsion was diluted with water (5 times) and then poured into the tube of the DLS device. The test was done at different time intervals (immediately after, one month later, and two months after the nanoemulsion was prepared).

2.3. Surface Charge Measurement

For this test, we used zeta potential measurement via a zeta-sizer device (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). One ml of the nanoemulsion was diluted with water (5 times) and then poured into the tube of the zeta-sizer. The test was done at different time intervals (immediately after, one month later, and two months after the nanoemulsion was prepared).

2.4. Morphology Study

The morphology of the prepared nanoemulsion was determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Philips, TecnaiG220). For this purpose, 1 ml nanomaterial (10 times diluted with distilled water) was placed on the carbon plate of the microscope at room temperature. The sample was painted with the help of phospho-tungsten acid (2%), and the image was taken. The test was done at different time intervals (immediately after, one month later, and two months after the nanoemulsion was prepared).

2.5. Stability Assessment

The prepared nanoemulsion was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4,000 rpm, and the emulsion resistance to centrifugation was tested. In addition, formulations were kept at room temperature for 2 months, and any phase separation was checked (at − 20, 4, and 25 ◦C). Besides, changes in droplet diameter, PDI, and surface charge were compared at different time intervals.

2.6. Assessment of the Cytotoxicity

Human Gingival Fibroblasts (HGFs) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. Cells were maintained at 37 ºC in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 104 cells per well. After 24 hours of incubation, cells were treated with varying concentrations of the prepared nanoemulsion for 24, 48, and 72 hrs. Untreated cells served as the control. Following the treatment period, the medium was removed, and cells were washed with PBS. Then, 50 microliters MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) solution was added to each well. The plates were then incubated at 37 ºC for 4 h. After incubation, the MTT solution was carefully aspirated, and the formazan crystals formed by viable cells were solubilized using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader, and the percentage of living cells was evaluated by comparing the control.

Fig. (1).

The results for transmission electron microscopic [TEM] images immediately after [A], one month later [B], and two months after [C] the nanoemulsion was prepared.

2.7. Ethical Considerations

The present study entered into the operation phase after the approval of the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences with the ethics ID of IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1402.018.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Results were reported as descriptive indicators. To check the normalization of the data, the Shapiro-Wilk test was conducted. In order to compare the groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was carried out. For data analysis, SPSS software was used. The value of 0.05 was considered to be a significant level.

Table 1.
The results for the mean particle size and the surface charge.
Time The Mean Particle Size [nm] PDI The Surface Charge [mV]
Immediately 92±1.2 0.4±0.9 -33
30 days 101±1.5 0.5±1.1 -30
60 days 130±1.2 0.7±1.4 -23

3. RESULTS

Table 1 presents the results for the mean particle size, PDI, and the surface charge immediately after, one month later, and two months after the nanomaterials were prepared. Fig. (1) shows the results for transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images immediately after, one month later, and two months after the nanoemulsion was prepared. Table 2 presents the results for the cell viability percent after 24, 48, and 72 hours. The prepared nanoemulsion was non-cytotoxic against Human Gingival Fibroblasts (HGFs) at studied times according to ISO 10993-5 [21].

Table 2.
The results for the cell viability percent after 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Time Control Cell Viability Percent Nanoemulsion Cell Viability Percent P-value
24 h 100±0 98.2±1.2 0.6
48 h 99.9±0.6 97.3±1.3 0.7
72 h 99.9±0.8 97.0±0.9 0.7

4. DISCUSSION

Droplet size greatly influences the in vivo fate of the nanoemulsion [22]. So, it is essential to control the droplet diameter of the nanoemulsion systems. Small PDI values (PDI < 0.7) specify a moderately narrow size distribution of nanomaterials [23]. Zeta potential values higher than ±30 mV show suspension stability [24]. Wei et al. reported similar results for tea tree oil nanoemulsion [20]. The results of this study showed spherical monodispersed droplets for the prepared nanoemulsion. The droplet size showed a slight increase after one month. After 60 days, the increase in the droplet size was significant (P<0.05).

The creaming, sedimentation, and phase separation of emulsion systems can be evaluated by a centrifugation test to ensure their stability [25]. As mentioned in Table 1, the droplet size, PDI, and surface charge of the nanoemulsion at two steps showed a slight increase (P=0.6). After 60 days, the increase in the droplet size, PDI, and surface charge were significant (P=0.03). However, the droplet size was still maintained below 200 nm, and the PDI was less than 0.7. Nanoemulsion also presented no physical alterations or phase separation after 4000 rpm centrifugation force. Moreover, it showed good stability when exposed to three different temperatures (− 20, 4, and 25 ◦C] for 60 days. In a study by Wei et al., tea tree oil nanoemulsion showed no physical changes or phase separation after centrifugation [20].

The prepared nanoemulsion was non-cytotoxic against Human Gingival Fibroblasts (HGFs) at studied times according to ISO 10993-5 [21]. Khadem Nezhad et al. examined the cytotoxicity influence of Hypericum perforatum oil against human gingival fibroblasts. The results showed that the concentration of 0.625μg/ml of Hypericum perforatum did not have toxic effects on gingival fibroblast cells. Therefore, it can be used as a natural mouthwash product [26].

New findings in the dental field can advance the quality of life even in particularly complex patients [27]. For example, mucoadhesive polymeric oral drug delivery carriers can be suitable pharmaceutical agents [28, 29]. They can also functionalized to improve cell-specific interactions in the small intestine to enhance retention time and uptake [30]. Colombo et al. [30] and Aljuanid et al. [31] investigated mucoadhesive nanoemulsion patches for oral drug delivery.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the prepared Hypericum perforatum nanoemulsion exhibited excellent physicochemical properties, good stability, and no cytotoxicity against HGFs. The prepared nanoemulsion can be used to prevent and treat oral and dental infectious diseases like denture-related stomatitis in the near future. As a main future outlook, the utilization of a mucoadhesive carrier with sustained release antimicrobial and antifungal effects could significantly improve clinical outcomes.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The present study entered into the operation phase after the approval of the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences with the ethics ID of IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1402.018.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and/or research committee and with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data and supportive information are available within the article.

FUNDING

This study extracted the data from a proposal recorded at the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences [number 70125].

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Simin Sharifi is the editorial advisory board member of the journal TODENTJ.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Kristine LS, Lori R, Linda DB, Lori G. Child Care Providers&#039; Knowledge About Dental Injury First Aid in Preschool-age Children. Am Dent Hyg Assoc 2017; 91(3): 55.
2
Rathjen W. Dental technology, oral health and aesthetic appearance: A historical view. Icon 2007; 13: 105-24.
3
Thombare N, Kumar S, Kumari U, et al. Shellac as a multifunctional biopolymer: A review on properties, applications and future potential. Int J Biol Macromol 2022; 215: 203-23.
4
Tuma J, Lyutakov O, Goncharova I, Svorcik V. Ag-PMMA structures for application in infra-red optical range. Mater Chem Phys 2014; 148(1-2): 343-8.
5
McReynolds DE, Moorthy A, Moneley JOC, Jabra-Rizk MA, Sultan AS. Denture stomatitis—An interdisciplinary clinical review. J Prosthodont 2023; 32(7): 560-70.
6
Casemiro LA, Martins CHG, Pires-de-Souza FCP, Panzeri H. Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of acrylic resins with incorporated silver–zinc zeolite – part I. Gerodontology 2008; 25(3): 187-94.
7
Inácio Silveira DQ, Lia EN, Massignan C, Stefani CM. Natural products for the treatment of denture stomatitis: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 129(3): 413-24.
8
Abdallah EM, Alhatlani BY, de Paula Menezes R, Martins CHG. Back to nature. Plants 2023; 12(17): 3077.
9
Erfanifar Z, Majdinasab M, Shaghaghian S. Production and characterization of sage seed gum bioactive film containing Zataria multiflora essential oil nanoemulsion. Food Chem 2023; 408: 134871.
10
Kumari R, Suman K, Karmakar S, Mishra V, Lakra SG, Saurav GK. Regulation and safety measures for nanotechnology-based agri-products. Front Genome Ed 2023; 5: 1200987.
11
Chen K, Wu W, Hou X, Yang Q, Li ZJFQ. Safety. A review: Antimicrobial properties of several medicinal plants widely used in traditional chinese medicine. Food Qual Saf 2021; 5: fyab020.
12
Abdul Samad SK, Tatapudi R, Manyam R, Dasari D, Lakshmi R. Efficacy of curcumin in the treatment of denture stomatitis: A randomized double-blind study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2021; 25(2): 286-91.
13
Kaçar O, Bayram E. Traditional uses and cultivation of St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) in Türkiye. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Turkey 2023; 169-89.
14
Nahrstedt A, Butterweck VJP. Biologically active and other chemical constituents of the herb of Hypericum perforatum L. Pharmacopsychiatry 1997; 30(Suppl 2): 129-34.
15
Verma D, Singh S, Patel S. Anatomical characterisation and foliar microscopy of Hypericum perforatum L. 2022; 16(1): 3.
16
Motallebnejad M, Moghadamnia A, Talei MJJMS. The efficacy of Hypericum perforatum extract on recurrent aphthous ulcers. J Med Sci 2008; 8(1): 39-43.
17
Antoniadou M, Rozos G, Vaiou N, et al. The in vitro assessment of antibacterial and antioxidant efficacy in rosa damascena and hypericum perforatum extracts against pathogenic strains in the interplay of dental caries, oral health, and food microbiota. Microorganisms 2023; 12(1): 60.
18
Butler J, Handy RD, Upton M. Review of antimicrobial nanocoatings in medicine and dentistry: mechanisms of action, biocompatibility performance, safety, and benefits compared to antibiotics. ACS Nano 2023; 17(8): 7064-92.
19
Sharifi-Rad M, Pohl P, Epifano F, Álvarez-Suarez JM. Green synthesis and characterizations of silver nanoparticle using alcoholic extract of astragalus sarcocolla gum and evaluation of antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant activities. Nanomaterials 2020; 10(12): 2383.
20
Wei S, Zhao X, Yu J, et al. Characterization of tea tree oil nanoemulsion and its acute and subchronic toxicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2021; 124: 104999.
21
Vidal M. Cytotoxicity tests for evaluating medical devices: An alert for the development of biotechnology health products. J Biomed Sci Eng 2017; 10(09): 431.
22
Usta A. Synthesis, characterization and hyperthermia studies of thermosensitive hydrogels associated with magnetic nanoemulsions 2018. Available from: https://soar.wichita.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/8294e774-7711-4c58-b374-2006d8a8aace/content
23
Danaei M, Dehghankhold M, Ataei S, et al. Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics 2018; 10(2): 57.
24
Kim J-K. Characteristics of zeta potential distribution in silica particles. Bull Korean Chem Soc 2005; 26(7): 1083-9.
25
Tea L, Renou F, Benyahia L, Nicolaï T, Physicochemical SA, Aspects E. Assessment of the stability of water in water emulsions using analytical centrifugation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2021; 608: 125619.
26
Khadem Nezhad S, Taghavi Zenouz A, Aghazadeh M, Samadi Kafil H, Biology M. Strong antimicrobial activity of Hypericum perforatum L. against oral isolates of Lactobacillus spp. Cell Mol Biol 2017; 63(11): 58-62.
27
Palmieri A, Zollino I, Clauser L, et al. Biological effect of resorbable plates on normal osteoblasts and osteoblasts derived from Pfeiffer syndrome. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22(3): 860-3.
28
Yebra DM, Kiil S. Antifouling technology—past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog Org Coat 2004; 50(2): 75-104.
29
Hu N, Frueh J, Zheng C, Zhang B, He Q, Physicochemical SA. Photo-crosslinked natural polyelectrolyte multilayer capsules for drug delivery. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2015; 482: 315-23.
30
Colombo M, Figueiró F, de Fraga Dias A, Teixeira HF, Battastini AMO, Koester LS. Kaempferol-loaded mucoadhesive nanoemulsion for intranasal administration reduces glioma growth in vitro. Int J Pharm 2018; 543(1-2): 214-23.
31
Aljuanid MA, Qaid HR, Lashari DM, et al. Nano-emulsion of mangosteen rind extract in a mucoadhesive patch for periodontitis regenerative treatment: An in vivo study. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2022; 17(5): 910-20.