All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.
Alveolar Bone Fracture: Pathognomonic Sign for Clinical Diagnosis
Abstract
Aim:
Dental injuries, especially luxation and avulsion, are common. Dental trauma can cause alveolar bone fracture that can lead to tooth loss and malocclusion. Single tooth alveolar bone fractures are difficult to identify unless it protrudes through the overlying mucosa and can be visualized. Pain, malocclusion, and tooth mobility provide signs of suspected alveolar bone fractures. Integrity of the proximate alveolar bone should be examined for fractures where avulsion, luxation, or other tooth trauma is detected. Any suggestion of alveolar fractures should be further investigated with an appropriate radiograph.
Summary:
This case report shows a pathognomonic sign that detects and diagnosis single tooth alveolar bone fractures, i.e., a localized hematoma crossing the attached gingiva from the free gingival margin to the vestibular mucosa. This should serve as a warning for localized alveolar bone fracture.
A visualized hematoma and gentle, careful palpation may help detect covered fractures when the overlying mucosa is not perforated.
INTRODUCTION
A traumatic dental injury (TDI), especially luxation and avulsion injuries can cause alveolar bone fractures which in turn can lead to tooth loss. Traumatic alveolar bone fractures can be categorized into two types. The first type is confined to the area surrounding a single tooth. The second type can be defined as regional, and is generally easier to detect since the entire dento-alveolar segment is dislocated. Dentoalveolar traumas involving multiple teeth are not common, and mostly occur after severe trauma events such as serious sport injury, violence, or traffic accident [1, 2]. The highest prevalence of oral trauma is among children and adolescents during dental and alveolar development [3]. Wright et al. [1] reported a frequency of 16% of traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) in adolescents in the group of 12- to 15-years of age. In a 12-year systematic review of the literature regarding prevalence and incidence of TDIs, Glendor [4] stated that TDIs usually affect a single tooth, but can also involve the anterior teeth, and particularly, maxillary incisors. In a study of a 16-year-old cohort in northern Sweden, Borssen & Holm reported that 75% of the traumatized teeth were upper incisors [5]. Trauma accounts for 26% to 76% of uncomplicated crown fractures (UCF) [6], 15.5% for complicated crown fractures (CCF) [7], 7.7% for root fractures [8], 4-22% for avulsion, 5.5% for bone alveolar fractures, and 47- 58% for soft tissue injury [7, 9]. Management of concomitant dental injuries may be challenging, especially if there are additional complications related particularly to delayed treatments. Appropriate and timely diagnosis and interventions, as well as long-term follow-up are crucial for the success of the treatment [6, 10-12]. In the maxillary anterior area, regional teeth and alveolar ridge injury can cause severe alveolar ridge deficiency which may result in ridge atrophy, maxillary retrognathism and future rehabilitation difficulties [13]. Loss of teeth and alveolar bone, along with fibrotic scar formation, can cause adverse changes in the inter-arch space, occlusal plane, arch relationship and form. These changes may impede rehabilitation and impact the esthetic outcome [14]. Single tooth alveolar bone fractures are difficult to discern, unless the overlying mucosa is perforated. Symptoms such as pain, malocclusion, and tooth mobility provide additional clues of suspected alveolar bone fractures. Pulpal necrosis may occur following alveolar fractures near the apical root region [15, 16]. The integrity of the proximate alveolar bone should be examined for fractures in the areas where avulsions, luxations, or other tooth injury are detected [17]. When signs of alveolar fractures are observed, a radiograph of the traumatized region should be taken [18].
The current manuscript - presents a case report describing a particular sign which is pathognomonic for single tooth alveolar bone fractures. An extensive review of relevant medical literature has not revealed similar cases.
CASE DESCRIPTION
A 12-year old boy presented at the Endodontics and Dental Trauma Unit located in our hospital, due to dental trauma. The medical and dental history was taken, followed by a thorough physical examination, neurological test, extra- and intra-oral examinations, and radiographic examination. The clinical examination showed laceration of the lips, and laterally luxation of the face and of the first right and left maxillary incisors. A localized hematoma crossing the attached gingiva from the free gingival margin to the vestibular mucosa was observed, adjacent to the left maxillary incisor (Fig. 1).
A periapical radiograph was taken on the day of injury (Fig. 2). The lacerations of the upper lip were sutured and the teeth manually repositioned. After occlusal adjustment, the teeth were splinted with a semi-flexible splint made with orthodontic wire #0.012 (ORMCO, Glendora, Mexico) and composite resin, which remained in place for 10 days. Ten days later, during the second appointment, an endodontic access cavity was created on the central left and right maxillary incisors. Canals were chemo-mechanically instrumented and dressed with calcium-hydroxide. At the end of the session, the splint was removed and the occlusion was reassessed. A month later, the canals were prepared to size #60 and sealed with gutta-percha points and AH26 sealer.
At 16 months of follow-up, no symptoms were observed. A clinical examination showed vertical bone resorption at the fracture area. The radiograph showed remarkable bone resorption around the first left maxillary incisor Figs. (3 and 4). The patient was referred to the Periodontal Department for further evaluation and treatment.
DISCUSSION
Long-term consequences of dento-alveolar trauma mismanagement can be devastating. Early correct diagnosis of such injuries and appropriate referral - might greatly contribute to the success of the treatment and can prevent premature tooth or alveolar bone loss, and the consequent burden of prosthetic rehabilitation. In the case described in the current paper, the localized hematoma crossing the attached gingiva from the free gingival margin to the vestibular mucosa was a warning sign for a localized alveolar bone fracture. In cases of alveolar bone fractures, recent protocols recommend fixation for a period of 4 to 6 weeks [19, 20], based on the prognosis of bone healing after injury. However, in this particular case, due to the omitted diagnosis of the alveolar bone fracture, the most appropriate treatment which could have reduced bone resorption had not been provided.
Alveolar bone fractures are usually splinted using wiring techniques, such as arch bars, figure-eight and loop wiring, orthodontic bands, and acrylic or metallic cap splints. In case of luxation injuries, the outcome depends more on the duration of the splinting than on the type of splinting [21]. For example, in a study conducted in animal models, replanted teeth splinted for 30 days developed a higher incidence of replacement resorption than teeth splinted for only one week [22].
In alveolar fractures, the fixation plays an important role in achieving proper fracture and bone healing. Unlike the fixation for avulsion, the fixation for alveolar fractures should be rigid in order to allow proper bone healing. While maintaining a rigid fixation of the alveolar segment, the splint should allow physiological movement of the luxated teeth in the fractured alveolar segment. There are various types of rigid fixation, such as wiring with arch bars, composite splint, plate and screw fixation. The choice of the splinting method depends on the type of alveolar fracture and the number of teeth presented in the arch. The duration of the fixation can vary between 4 to 6 weeks. The key to adequate immobilization is to anchor the fracture segment rigidly to at least 3 to 4 stable teeth on both sides of the fractured alveolar segment [23, 24]. The incidence of alveolar fractures is difficult to estimate since they are usually reported in conjunction with dental injuries and facial fractures.
For instance, in a study conducted at the University Dental Hospital in Copenhagen, alveolar fractures accounted for 9% of all dento-alveolar injuries of permanent dentition [25, 26]. Another retrospective study of 237 patients who suffered from maxillofacial injuries over a five year period, reported that alveolar fractures accounted for approximately 2% of all mandibular and 9% of all maxillary fractures [27]. At the Osaka University Dental Hospital, the most common form of maxillofacial injury found among 174 patients up to 16 years of age was mandibular fractures (56%), followed by dento-alveolar fractures (31%) [28].
Although alveolar fractures can occur at any age, the first and second decades after the permanent incisors erupt are the most common [26, 28]. A review of 9,543 cases of cranio-maxillo-facial trauma conducted at the University Hospital of Innsbruck found that the mean age of all dento-alveolar injuries was 18 years [29]. Epidemiological studies have shown that males are twice as likely as females to experience dento-alveolar and facial trauma [30].
The causes of alveolar fractures vary within different age groups. Among children, these fractures are frequently caused by bicycle injuries, falls, sports injuries and, occasionally, car crashes and child abuse. For adults, the cause is usually fighting, motor vehicle crashes, falls, contact injuries and, occasionally work-related trauma [28, 29,31].
Alveolar fractures occur predominantly in dentate arches, but can also occur in edentulous arches. The anterior maxilla and mandible are common sites due to the location and vulnerability of these regions [32, 33]. Other factors which predispose the anterior maxilla to dento-alveolar injuries include increased maxillary incisor over-jet and proclination and incompetent lips [34]. The anatomic shape and high density of buccal and lingual cortical bone make the posterior mandible less prone to alveolar fractures [13].
Alveolar fracture may involve an isolated tooth, or two or more teeth with labial or lingual displacement of the dento-alveolar segment, resulting in loss of the arch continuity and painful occlusal interference. In isolated alveolar bone fracture, the detection of such a trauma is very difficult. In the presented case, insufficient management led to an incorrect protocol treatment and unsatisfactory results of the alveolar bone resorption.
Alveolar fractures cause injury to the supporting bone and vascular supply and, potentially, to the pulp, periodontal ligament (PDL) of the involved teeth, and adjacent mucogingival soft tissue. Complications that arise represent a direct result of damage to any of these tissues and can be further exacerbated by inadequate treatment.
Inadequate fixation and splinting can cause mobility of the fractured segment. As a result, small alveolar segments can sequestrate, resulting in the loss of supporting bone, and this can compromise the tooth prognosis. Proper fixation, an adequate immobilization period and elimination of occlusal trauma are necessary for bone healing. In alveolar fractures, tooth loss can occur as a result of severe comminution of the bony socket, fractured and non-restorable roots, or subsequent root resorption, and may have serious psychological implications, especially when anterior teeth are involved [35, 36].
Ekşioğlu et al. investigated the presence of different ultrasonographic findings associated with fractures among 39 patients up to 14 years of age. In all patients, a subperiosteal hematoma was found. A hematoma should raise the suspicion of alveolar fracture and could be considered as a pathognomonic sign of alveolar fracture, especially when it is not detected radiographically [37].
CONCLUSION
Early recognition of clinical and radiographic signs of localized alveolar bone fracture is essential, and appropriate management is imperative to prevent bone and tooth loss risks. In the 16 years old boy case presented in the current manuscript, recognizing the presence of a hematoma adjacent to the first left maxillary incisor along with careful palpation would have helped to detect the covered alveolar fracture. This, in turn, would have had a positive impact on the treatment outcome, by specifically using the immobilization and splinting method.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The presence of hematoma should be considered pathognomonic for alveolar fracture.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Declared none.