Perceptions of Teaching Methods for Preclinical Oral Surgery: A Comparison with Learning Styles



Esam Omar*
Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
1
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 396
Abstract HTML Views: 341
PDF Downloads: 250
ePub Downloads: 107
Total Views/Downloads: 1094
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 257
Abstract HTML Views: 179
PDF Downloads: 161
ePub Downloads: 76
Total Views/Downloads: 673



© 2017 Esam Omar

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, P.O.Box 41265 Madinah 40919, Saudi Arabia; Tel: 0966569536708; E-mails: esamomar@hotmail.com, eomar@taibahu.edu.sa


Abstract

Purpose:

Dental extraction is a routine part of clinical dental practice. For this reason, understanding the way how students’ extraction knowledge and skills development are important.

Problem Statement and Objectives:

To date, there is no accredited statement about the most effective method for the teaching of exodontia to dental students. Students have different abilities and preferences regarding how they learn and process information. This is defined as learning style. In this study, the effectiveness of active learning in the teaching of preclinical oral surgery was examined. The personality type of the groups involved in this study was determined, and the possible effect of personality type on learning style was investigated.

Method:

This study was undertaken over five years from 2011 to 2015. The sample consisted of 115 students and eight staff members. Questionnaires were submitted by 68 students and all eight staff members involved. Three measures were used in the study: The Index of Learning Styles (Felder and Soloman, 1991), the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), and the styles of learning typology (Grasha and Hruska-Riechmann).

Results and Discussion:

Findings indicated that demonstration and minimal clinical exposure give students personal validation. Frequent feedback on their work is strongly indicated to build the cognitive, psychomotor, and interpersonal skills needed from preclinical oral surgery courses.

Conclusion:

Small group cooperative active learning in the form of demonstration and minimal clinical exposure that gives frequent feedback and students’ personal validation on their work is strongly indicated to build the skills needed for preclinical oral surgery courses.

Keywords: Educational methodology of oral surgery, Preclinical course, Learning style, Teaching methods.