TODENTJ-25-03-2019_TODENTJ-2-56 1553504990 Bentham Open doi@benthamopen.net Bentham Open The Open Dentistry Journal TODENTJ 1874-2106 3 12 2008 2 1 Atsushi Kameyama Taeko Nakazawa Akiko Haruyama Chikahiro Haruyama Makoto Hosaka Yoshito Hirai This study compared surface roughness and gloss produced by different finishing/polishing procedures for two resin composites, Clearfil AP-X (AP-X) and Estelite Σ (ES). A total of 70 composite discs (n=35 for each resin composite) were prepared and divided at random into seven finishing/polishing groups (n=5): glass-pressed control; using a super-fine-grit diamond bur (SF); using CompoMaster (CM) after SF-finishing (SF+CM); using White Point (WP) after SF-finishing (SF+WP); using CM after SF+WP-finishing (SF+WP+CM); using Stainbuster (SB) after SF-finishing (SF+SB); and using CM after SF+SB-finishing (SF+SB+CM). After the finishing/polishing procedures, average surface roughness (Ra) and surface gloss (Gs(60°)) of all specimens were assessed with a surface profilometer and specimen gloss meter, respectively. Glass-pressed controls for both AP-X and ES composites showed the best surface finish in terms of both Ra and Gs(60°). SF-finishing produced the roughest surface and led to almost complete loss of gloss. While additional polishing with CM reduced Ra and increased Gs(60°), the additional finishing effect of WP or SB between SF-finishing and CM-polishing was not found for either AP-X or ES. 3 12 2008 56 60 TODENTJ-2-56 1 10.2174/crossmark_policy opendentistryjournal.com benthamopen.com true Peer Reviewed Single blind Checked with iThenticate 2007-11-21 2008-2-13 2008-3-12 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ 10.2174/1874210600802010056 1553504990 https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/2/PAGE/56/ https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V2/TODENTJ-2-56/TODENTJ-2-56.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V2/TODENTJ-2-56/TODENTJ-2-56.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V2/TODENTJ-2-56/TODENTJ-2-56.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V2/TODENTJ-2-56/TODENTJ-2-56.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V2/TODENTJ-2-56/TODENTJ-2-56.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V2/TODENTJ-2-56/TODENTJ-2-56.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V2/TODENTJ-2-56/TODENTJ-2-56.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V2/TODENTJ-2-56/TODENTJ-2-56.xml Pract Proc Aesthet Dent Peyton JH 14 203 2002 Peyton JH. Direct restoration of anterior teeth review of the clinical technique and case presentation Pract Proc Aesthet Dent 2002; 14 : 203-10. Oper Dent Jung M 32 45 2007 Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing Oper Dent 2007; 32 : 45-52. Murchison DF, Roeters J, Vargas MA. Chan DCN (2006) Direct anterior restorations In: Ed. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Hilton TJ, Schwartz ES, Eds. Dent Mater Shintani H 1 225 1985 Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins Dent Mater 1985; 1 : 225-7. J Esthet Restor Dent Lu H 17 102 2005 Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17 : 102-9. J Prosthet Dent Larato DC 28 402 1972 Larato DC. Influence of composite restoration on the gingiva J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28 : 402-. Oper Dent Jung M 28 53 2003 Jung M, Voit S, Klimek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing Oper Dent 2003; 28 : 53-9. Oper Dent Roeder LB 25 534 2000 Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites Oper Dent 2000; 25 : 534-43. Braz Dent J Barbosa SH 16 39 2005 Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, Navarro MFL, Nunes OB. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins Braz Dent J 2005; 16 : 39-44. Oper Dent Lu H 31 734 2006 Lu H, Lee YK, Oguri M, Powers JM. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler Oper Dent 2006; 31 : 734-40. J Oral Rehabil Ozgünaltay G 30 218 2003 Ozgünaltay G, Yazici AR, Görücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30 : 218-4. Oper Dent Türkün LS 29 203 2004 Türkün LS, Türkün M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials Oper Dent 2004; 29 : 203-11. J Oral Rehabil Yap AUJ 25 456 1998 Yap AUJ, Sau CW, Lye KW. Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25 : 456-61. J Prosthet Dent Park SH 83 660 2000 Park SH, Krejci I, Lutz F. Hardness of celluloid strip-finished or polished composite surfaces with time J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83 : 660-3. J Oral Rehabil Park SH 31 62 2004 Park SH, Noh BD, Ahn HJ, Kim HK. Celluloid strip-finished versus polished composite surface difference in surface discoloration in microhybrid composites J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31 : 62-. J Biomater Appl Baseren M 19 121 2004 Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures J Biomater Appl 2004; 19 : 121-34. Am J Dent Reis AF 15 193 2002 Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites Am J Dent 2002; 15 : 193-7. Jpn J Conserv Dent Miyazaki M 43 1040 2000 Miyazaki M, Yamada M, Ando S, et al. A study on one-step polishing points Influence of polishing duration and handpiece load on surface texture and light-cured resins Jpn J Conserv Dent 2000; 43 : 1040-9. (In Japanese) J Am Dent Assoc Stanford WB 110 211 1985 Stanford WB, Fan PL, Wozniak WT, Stanford JW. Effect of finishing on color and gloss of composites with different fillers J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 110 : 211-3. Jpn J Conserv Dent Ohmura Y 39 1271 1996 Ohmura Y. Effect of polishing methods on the surface characteristics of composite resins Jpn J Conserv Dent 1996; 39 : 1271-87. (In Japanese) Quintessence Int Watanabe T 37 61 2006 Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Moore BK. Influence of polishing instruments on the surface texture of resin composites Quintessence Int 2006; 37 : 61-7. J Esthet Restor Dent Da Costa J 19 214 2007 Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, Mazur RF, Roeder L. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19 : 214-4.