TODENTJ-25-03-2019_TODENTJ-13-53
1553507724
Bentham Open
doi@benthamopen.net
Bentham Open
The Open Dentistry Journal
TODENTJ
1874-2106
02
28
2019
13
1
Effects of Mandibular Protraction Appliance and Jasper Jumper in Class II Malocclusion Treatment
Rafael P.
Henriques
José F. C.
Henriques
Guilherme
Janson
Marcos R. de
Freitas
Karina M. S.
Freitas
Manoela F.
Francisconi
Fernanda P.
H. Fontes
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the effects of Mandibular Protraction Appliance (MPA) and Jasper Jumper (JJ), associated with fixed orthodontic appliances for Class II malocclusion treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Sample comprised of 71 subjects, divided into 3 groups: Group 1: 24 patients, mean initial age 12.36 years, treated with MPA for 2.74 years; Group 2: 25 patients, mean initial age 12.72 years, treated with JJ for 2.15 years; Control Group: 22 subjects, mean age of 12.67 years, with untreated Class II malocclusion, followed for 2.12 years. Initial and final variables and treatment changes were compared between groups by ANOVA and Tukey tests.
Results:
JJ group presented greater restriction of growth and maxillary retrusion and MPA showed a greater increase of mandibular effective length. MPA and JJ groups showed improvement of maxillomandibular relationship. Maxillary incisors showed greater retrusion and retroclination in MPA group. MPA presented greater proclination of mandibular incisors and JJ showed greater protrusion. MPA and JJ groups presented a decrease in overbite and overjet.
Conclusion:
MPA showed a significant increase in mandibular effective length and great dentoalveolar compensation. JJ showed significant restriction of maxillary anterior displacement and also important dentoalveolar compensations. JJ must be indicated mainly in cases with maxillary protrusion, and MPA, especially in cases with mandibular deficiency.
02
28
2019
53
60
TODENTJ-13-53
1
10.2174/crossmark_policy
opendentistryjournal.com
benthamopen.com
true
Peer Reviewed
Single blind
Checked with iThenticate
2018-11-20
2019-01-2
2019-1-24
2019-02-28
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
10.2174/1874210601913010053
1553507724
https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/13/PAGE/53/
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V13/TODENTJ-13-53/TODENTJ-13-53.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V13/TODENTJ-13-53/TODENTJ-13-53.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V13/TODENTJ-13-53/TODENTJ-13-53.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V13/TODENTJ-13-53/TODENTJ-13-53.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V13/TODENTJ-13-53/TODENTJ-13-53.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V13/TODENTJ-13-53/TODENTJ-13-53.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V13/TODENTJ-13-53/TODENTJ-13-53.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V13/TODENTJ-13-53/TODENTJ-13-53.xml
Jasper JJ.
The Jasper Jumper: A fixed functional appliance
1987.
Rev. Dent. Press Ortodon. Ortop. Facial
Coelho Filho C.M.
7
49
2002
Coelho Filho CM.
The mandibular protraction appliance IV.
Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial
2002;
7
: 49-60.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Pancherz H.
117
571
2000
10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70203-4
Pancherz H.
Dentofacial orthopedics or orthognathic surgery: Is it a matter of age?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2000;
117
(5)
: 571-4.
Am. J. Orthod.
Pancherz H.
76
423
1979
10.1016/0002-9416(79)90227-6
Pancherz H.
Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation.
Am J Orthod
1979;
76
(4)
: 423-42.
J. Clin. Orthod.
Coelho Filho C.M.
29
319
1995
Coelho Filho CM.
Mandibular protraction appliances for Class II treatment.
J Clin Orthod
1995;
29
(5)
: 319-36.
J. Clin. Orthod.
Coelho Filho C.M.
31
92
1997
Coelho Filho CM.
Clinical applications of the mandibular protraction appliance.
J Clin Orthod
1997;
31
(2)
: 92-102.
J. Clin. Orthod.
Coelho Filho C.M.
35
18
2001
Coelho Filho CM.
Mandibular protraction appliance IV.
J Clin Orthod
2001;
35
(1)
: 18-24.
10.1590/2177-6709.23.3.063-072.oar
10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.029
Siqueira DF, de Almeira RR, Janson G, Brandao AG, Coelho Filho CM.
Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2017;
131
(447)
: 21-30.
Dental Press J. Orthod.
Furquim B.D.
23
63
2018
10.1590/2177-6709.23.3.063-072.oar
Furquim BD, Janson G, Cope LCC, Freitas KMS, Henriques JFC.
Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults.
Dental Press J Orthod
2018;
23
(3)
: 63-72.
Braz. Dent. J.
Pontes L.F.
28
225
2017
10.1590/0103-6440201701032
Pontes LF, Maia FA, Almeida MR, Flores-Mir C, Normando D.
Mandibular protraction appliance effects in class II malocclusion in children, adolescents and young adults.
Braz Dent J
2017;
28
(2)
: 225-33.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Jasper J.J.
108
641
1995
10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70010-2
Jasper JJ, McNamara JA Jr.
The correction of interarch malocclusions using a fixed force module.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1995;
108
(6)
: 641-50.
BMJ
Dahlberg G.
2
358
1940
10.1136/bmj.2.4158.358-b
Dahlberg G.
Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience.
BMJ
1940;
2
(4158)
: 358-9.
Am. J. Orthod.
Houston W.J.B.
83
382
1983
10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6
Houston WJB.
The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements.
Am J Orthod
1983;
83
(5)
: 382-90.
Angle Orthod.
Janson G.
74
594
2004
Janson G, Caffer DdeC, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR, Neves LS.
Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.
Angle Orthod
2004;
74
(5)
: 594-604.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Wieslander L.
104
319
1993
10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81328-9
Wieslander L.
Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1993;
104
(4)
: 319-29.
Neves LS.
Comparative study of treatment effects of the Class II division 1 malocclusion with the Jasper Jumper and Bionator, associated to fixed appliances [thesis]
2007.
Lima KJRS.
Comparison od dentoskeletal changes promoted by the Jasper Jumper and Activator appliances combined to extraoral anchorage followed by fixed appliances, in treatment of the Class division 1 [thesis]
2007.
Angle Orthod.
Küçükkeleş N.
77
449
2007
10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0449:TEISCI]2.0.CO;2
Küçükkeleş N, Ilhan I, Orgun IA.
Treatment efficiency in skeletal Class II patients treated with the jasper jumper.
Angle Orthod
2007;
77
(3)
: 449-56.
Angle Orthod.
Cope J.B.
64
113
1994
Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO III.
Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy.
Angle Orthod
1994;
64
(2)
: 113-22.
Angle Orthod.
Nalbantgil D.
75
426
2005
Nalbantgil D, Arun T, Sayinsu K, Fulya I.
Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence.
Angle Orthod
2005;
75
(3)
: 426-36.
Angle Orthod.
Covell D.A.
69
311
1999
Covell DA Jr, Trammell DW, Boero RP, West R.
A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
Angle Orthod
1999;
69
(4)
: 311-20.
Angle Orthod.
Karacay S.
76
666
2006
Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D.
Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Angle Orthod
2006;
76
(4)
: 666-72.
Eur. J. Orthod.
Stucki N.
20
271
1998
10.1093/ejo/20.3.271
Stucki N, Ingervall B.
The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition.
Eur J Orthod
1998;
20
(3)
: 271-81.
Brandão AG.
Comparative cephalometric study of changes promoted by the mandibular protraction appliance and pendulum, associated to fixed appliances, in treatment of the Class II division 1 malocclusion [thesis]
2006.
Am. J. Orthod.
McNamara J.A.
86
449
1984
10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90352-X
McNamara JA Jr.
A method of cephalometric evaluation.
Am J Orthod
1984;
86
(6)
: 449-69.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Weiland F.J.
108
341
1995
10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70031-5
Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP.
Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance--a preliminary report.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1995;
108
(4)
: 341-50.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
de Oliveira J.N.
132
54
2007
10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.028
de Oliveira JN Jr, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Rodrigues de Almeida M, de Oliveira JN.
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2007;
132
(1)
: 54-62.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Weiland F.J.
112
19
1997
10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70269-5
Weiland FJ, Ingervall B, Bantleon HP, Droacht H.
Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1997;
112
(1)
: 19-27.
Eur. J. Orthod.
Küçükkeles N.
17
445
1995
Küçükkeles N, Orgun IA.
Correction of Class II malocclusions with a Jasper Jumper in growing patients.
Eur J Orthod
1995;
17
: 445.
Rev. Dent. Press Ortodon. Ortop. Facial
Coelho Filho C.M.
3
69
1998
Coelho Filho CM.
Clinical use of the mandibular projection appliance.
Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial
1998;
3
: 69-130.
Minerva Stomatol.
Isola G.
66
1
2017
Isola G, Ramaglia L, Cordasco G, Lucchese A, Fiorillo L, Matarese G.
The effect of a functional appliance in the management of temporomandibular joint disorders in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Minerva Stomatol
2017;
66
(1)
: 1-8.