TODENTJ-25-03-2019_TODENTJ-12-296
1553507347
Bentham Open
doi@benthamopen.net
Bentham Open
The Open Dentistry Journal
TODENTJ
1874-2106
04
16
2018
12
1
Influence of Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs on Orthodontic Treatment Planning of Class II Patients
Irina
Stupar
Enver
Yetkiner
Daniel
Wiedemeier
Thomas
Attin
Rengin
Attin
Background:
Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs (LCR) are a common decision-making aid in orthodontic treatment planning and are routinely used in clinical practice. The aim of this present study was to test the null hypothesis that LCR evaluation does not alter specific components of orthodontic treatment planning in Class II patients.
Materials and Methods:
Records of 75 patients, who had been treated at the Department of Orthodontics, Centre of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich comprised the study material. Inclusion criteria were: (1) adolescents between the age of 12-15, (2) permanent dentition with Class II buccal segment relationship (3) absence of craniofacial and dento-alveolar malformations. Fifteen orthodontists from the dental faculties of Istanbul University, Istanbul and Ege University, Izmir filled out Likert-type linear scale questionnaires without knowing that they would repeat the same procedure with and without LCRs at two different time points. Equivalence and clinical relevance were assessed using (%95 CI) Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
Results:
Extraction decision did not differ between groups (p=0.68). Preference of functional appliance use (p=0.006) and inter-maxillary fixed functional appliance (p=0.043) was different among groups.
Conclusion:
LCR evaluation has minor influence on treatment planning procedure of Class II patients. It might be beneficial to consider its prescription not in a routine manner but as a supplementary tool considering possible reduction of radiation exposure.
04
16
2018
296
302
TODENTJ-12-296
1
10.2174/crossmark_policy
opendentistryjournal.com
benthamopen.com
true
Peer Reviewed
Single blind
Checked with iThenticate
2017-12-26
2018-02-28
2018-3-14
2018-04-16
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
10.2174/1874210601812010296
1553507347
https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/12/PAGE/296/
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-296/TODENTJ-12-296.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-296/TODENTJ-12-296.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-296/TODENTJ-12-296.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-296/TODENTJ-12-296.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-296/TODENTJ-12-296.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-296/TODENTJ-12-296.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-296/TODENTJ-12-296.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-296/TODENTJ-12-296.xml
Currier GF.
Riolo M, Avery JK.
Orthodontic exam and diagnosis.
Essentials for orthodontic practice
2003;
264-301.
Proffit WR.
Diagnosis & treatment planning. In: Proffit WR, Ed.
Contemporary Orthodontics
2012;
147-214.
Br. J. Orthod.
Buchanan I.B.
21
185
1994
10.1179/bjo.21.2.185
Buchanan IB, Downing A, Stirrups DR.
A comparison of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need applied clinically and to diagnostic records.
Br J Orthod
1994;
21
(2)
: 185-8.
Eur. J. Orthod.
Nijkamp P.G.
30
630
2008
10.1093/ejo/cjn059
Nijkamp PG, Habets LLMH, Aartman IHA, Zentner A.
The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning.
Eur J Orthod
2008;
30
(6)
: 630-5.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Baumrind S.
109
393
1996
10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70121-X
Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL, Maxwell R.
The decision to extract: part II. Analysis of clinicians’ stated reasons for extraction.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1996;
109
(4)
: 393-402.
[PMID: 8638581].
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Devereux L.
139
e175
2011
10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.021
Devereux L, Moles D, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M.
How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2011;
139
(2)
: e175-81.
[PMID:21300228].
J. Dent. Educ.
Hujoel P.
70
1061
2006
Hujoel P, Hollender L, Bollen AM, Young JD, McGee M, Grosso A.
Radiographs associated with one episode of orthodontic therapy.
J Dent Educ
2006;
70
(10)
: 1061-5.
[PMID:17021285].
Lancet
Berrington de González A.
363
345
2004
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0
Berrington de González A, Darby S.
Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: Estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.
Lancet
2004;
363
(9406)
: 345-51.
[PMID:15070562].
Lancet
Berrington de González A.
363
345
2004
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0
Berrington de González A, Darby S.
Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.
Lancet
2004;
363
(9406)
: 345-51.
[PMID:15070562].
Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent.
Espelid I.
4
40
2003
Espelid I, Mejàre I, Weerheijm K.
EAPD guidelines for use of radiographs in children.
Eur J Paediatr Dent
2003;
4
(1)
: 40-8.
[PMID:12870988].
Head Face Med.
Dinçer B.
9
36
2013
10.1186/1746-160X-9-36
Dinçer B, Yetkiner E, Aras I, Attin T, Attin R.
Influence of lateral cephalometric radiographs on extraction decision in skeletal class I patients.
Head Face Med
2013;
9
: 36.
[PMID:24304887].
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Brenner D.J.
100
13761
2003
10.1073/pnas.2235592100
Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al.
Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
2003;
100
(24)
: 13761-6.
[PMID:14610281].
Angle Orthod.
Silling G.
49
259
1979
Silling G, Rauch MA, Pentel L, Garfinkel L, Halberstadt G.
The significance of cephalometrics in treatment planning.
Angle Orthod
1979;
49
(4)
: 259-62.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Han U.K.
100
212
1991
10.1016/0889-5406(91)70058-5
Han UK, Vig KWI, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ.
Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1991;
100
(3)
: 212-9.
[PMID:1877545].
Acta Odontol. Scand.
Mok C.W.
65
362
2007
10.1080/00016350701771850
Mok CW, Zhou L, McGrath C, Hägg U, Bendeus M.
Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need.
Acta Odontol Scand
2007;
65
(6)
: 362-8.
[PMID:18071959].
Angle Orthod.
Ritschel R.
83
1059
2013
10.2319/021113-124.1
Ritschel R, Bechtold TE, Berneburg M.
Effect of cephalograms on decisions for early orthodontic treatment.
Angle Orthod
2013;
83
(6)
: 1059-65.
[PMCID: PMC3932141].
Isaacson KG, Thom A.
Guidelines for the use of radiographs in clinical orthodontics
2001.
Macri V, Athanasiou AE.
Sources of error in lateral cephalometry.
Orthodontic Cephalometry
1995;
125-40.
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Weintraub J.A.
96
462
1989
10.1016/0889-5406(89)90112-1
Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ.
The prevalence of orthodontic extractions.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1989;
96
(6)
: 462-6.
[PMID:2589256].
J. Clin. Orthod.
Keim R.G.
48
607
2014
Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Vogels DS III, Vogels PB.
2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: Results and trends.
J Clin Orthod
2014;
48
(10)
: 607-30.
[PMID:25416338].
Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.
Vaden J.L.
109
393
1996
10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70127-0
Vaden JL.
MS, Kiser HHE. Straight talk about extraction and nonextraction: A differential dignostic decision.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1996;
109
: 393-402.
[PMID:8638587].
Int. J. Adult Orthodon. Orthognath. Surg.
Cochrane S.M.
14
291
1999
Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP.
A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg
1999;
14
(4)
: 291-5.
[PMID:10895644].