<?xml version="1.0"?>
<doi_batch xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" xmlns:ct="http://www.crossref.org/clinicaltrials.xsd" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:rel="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" version="4.4.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0 crossref4.4.0.xsd">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>TODENTJ-25-03-2019_TODENTJ-12-173</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>1553507310</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>Bentham Open</depositor_name>
      <email_address>doi@benthamopen.net</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>Bentham Open</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata language="en">
        <full_title>The Open Dentistry Journal</full_title>
        <abbrev_title>TODENTJ</abbrev_title>
        <issn media_type="print">1874-2106</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>02</month>
          <day>22</day>
          <year>2018</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>12</volume>
        </journal_volume>
        <issue>1</issue>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
        <titles>
          <title>Thermafil: A New Clinical Approach Due to New Dimensional Evaluations</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first">
            <given_name>G.</given_name>
            <surname>Vittoria</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>G.</given_name>
            <surname>Pantaleo</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>A.</given_name>
            <surname>Blasi</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>G.</given_name>
            <surname>Spagnuolo</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>A.</given_name>
            <surname>Iandolo</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>M.</given_name>
            <surname>Amato</surname>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Background:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>There are a lot of techniques to obturate the root canals, but lateral condensation of gutta-percha is the most used one. An important aspect of thermafil is the error margin tolerated by the manufacturer in the production of plastic carriers. In literature, there is no evidence about discrepancy percentage between different carriers. It is demonstrated that the error margin of gutta-percha is 0.5% and is 0.2% for metal files (ISO standards).</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Objective:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the real dimensions of thermafil plastic carriers observed by the stereo microscope measuring the dimensional discrepancy between them.</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Methods:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>For this study, 80 new thermafil (Dentsply Maillefer) have been selected. 40 thermafil 0.25 and 40 thermafil 0.30. Through 60X stereo microscope, the dimensions of the plastic carrier tips have been measured. The dimensions of the plastic carrier were also measured after a heating cycle. ZL GAL 11TUSM (Zetaline stereo evolution) microscope was used to observe the samples. Measurements were made through a dedicated software (Image Focus). All samples were analysed at 60X.</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Results:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>A non-parametric paired test (Wilcoxon test) was used to compare baseline and after heating values; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>-values ≤ 0.05 were assumed to be statistically significant.</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>The samples we measured showed a mean value of the diameters in Thermafil 25 that was 0.27 mm, for Thermafil 30 the mean value was 0.33 mm.</jats:p>
                    <jats:p>We have measured a dimensional variable of 8% in the 25 group while in group 30 the maximum possible variation found was 4%, that’s why we propose a new protocol of obturation with thermafil. We can also conclude that a single heating process does not affect clinically the plastic carrier dimensions.</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
            </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date>
          <month>02</month>
          <day>22</day>
          <year>2018</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>173</first_page>
          <last_page>180</last_page>
        </pages>
        <publisher_item>
          <identifier id_type="sici">TODENTJ-12-173</identifier>
        </publisher_item>
        <crossmark>
          <crossmark_version>1</crossmark_version>
          <crossmark_policy>10.2174/crossmark_policy</crossmark_policy>
          <crossmark_domains>
            <crossmark_domain>
              <domain>opendentistryjournal.com</domain>
            </crossmark_domain>
            <crossmark_domain>
              <domain>benthamopen.com</domain>
            </crossmark_domain>
          </crossmark_domains>
          <crossmark_domain_exclusive>true</crossmark_domain_exclusive>
          <custom_metadata>
            <assertion name="review_status" label="Review Status" group_name="peer_review_details" group_label="Peer Review Details" order="0">Peer Reviewed</assertion>
            <assertion name="review_process" label="Review Process" group_name="peer_review_details" group_label="Peer Review Details" order="1">Single blind</assertion>
            <assertion name="screening_status" label="Screening Status" group_name="plagiarism_screening" group_label="Plagiarism Screening" order="0">Checked with iThenticate</assertion>
            <assertion name="received" label="Received" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="0">2017-11-11</assertion>
            <assertion name="revised" label="Revised" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="1">2018-01-22</assertion>
            <assertion name="accepted" label="Accepted" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="2">2018-01-31</assertion>
            <assertion name="published" label="Published" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="3">2018-02-22</assertion>
            <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
              <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</ai:license_ref>
            </ai:program>
          </custom_metadata>
        </crossmark>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.2174/1874210601812010173</doi>
          <timestamp>1553507310</timestamp>
          <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/12/PAGE/173/</resource>
          <collection property="crawler-based">
            <item crawler="google">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-173/TODENTJ-12-173.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="msn">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-173/TODENTJ-12-173.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="altavista">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-173/TODENTJ-12-173.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="yahoo">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-173/TODENTJ-12-173.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="scirus">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-173/TODENTJ-12-173.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="iParadigms">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-173/TODENTJ-12-173.pdf</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
          <collection property="text-mining">
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-173/TODENTJ-12-173.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/xml">https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V12/TODENTJ-12-173/TODENTJ-12-173.xml</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="ref1">
            <journal_title>Dent. Update</journal_title>
            <author>Gulabivala K.</author>
            <volume>21</volume>
            <first_page>73</first_page>
            <cYear>1994</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Gulabivala K, Leung SF. 
                    Review of a new root canal obturation technique. 
                    Dent Update  
                    1994; 
                    21
                    (2)
                    : 73-78, 80-83.
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref2">
            <journal_title>J. Int. Oral Health</journal_title>
            <author>Emmanuel S.</author>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <first_page>35</first_page>
            <cYear>2013</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Emmanuel S, Shantaram K, Sushil KC, Manoj L. 
                    An in-vitro evaluation and comparison of apical sealing ability of three different obturation technique - lateral condensation, Obtura II, and Thermafil. 
                    J Int Oral Health  
                    2013; 
                    5
                    (2)
                    : 35-43.
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref3">
            <journal_title>J. Conserv. Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Anantula K.</author>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <first_page>57</first_page>
            <cYear>2011</cYear>
            <doi>10.4103/0972-0707.80748</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Anantula K, Ganta AK. 
                    Evaluation and comparison of sealing ability of three different obturation techniques: Lateral condensation, Obtura II, and GuttaFlow: An in vitro study. 
                    J Conserv Dent  
                    2011; 
                    14
                    (1)
                    : 57-61.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref4">
            <journal_title>Microsc. Res. Tech.</journal_title>
            <author>Ersoy I.</author>
            <volume>78</volume>
            <first_page>404</first_page>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <doi>10.1002/jemt.22487</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Ersoy I, Evcil MS. 
                    Evaluation of the effect of different root canal obturation techniques using two root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots. 
                    Microsc Res Tech  
                    2015; 
                    78
                    (5)
                    : 404-7.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref5">
            <journal_title>G. Ital. Endod.</journal_title>
            <author>Greco K.</author>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <first_page>97</first_page>
            <cYear>2011</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.gien.2011.10.001</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Greco K, Carmignani E, Cantatore G. 
                    The Thermafil root canal obturation system. 
                    G Ital Endod  
                    2011; 
                    25
                    : 97-109.
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref6">
            <journal_title>Gen. Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Lee C.Q.</author>
            <volume>46</volume>
            <first_page>378</first_page>
            <cYear>1998</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Lee CQ, Cobb CM, Robinson SJ, LaMartina T, Vo T. 
                    
                        
                            In vitro
                         evaluation of the Thermafil technique with and without gutta percha coating. 
                    Gen Dent  
                    1998; 
                    46
                    (4)
                    : 378-81.
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref7">
            <journal_title>J. Endod.</journal_title>
            <author>Johnson B.</author>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <first_page>266</first_page>
            <cYear>1993</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80453-X</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Johnson B, Lasater D. 
                    Adaptation of thermafil components to canal walls. 
                    J Endod  
                    1993; 
                    19
                    (6)
                    : 266.
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref8">
            <journal_title>J. Endod.</journal_title>
            <author>Beasley R.T.</author>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <first_page>125</first_page>
            <cYear>2013</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.014</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Beasley RT, Williamson AE, Justman BC, Qian F. 
                    Time required to remove guttacore, thermafil plus, and thermoplasticized gutta-percha from moderately curved root canals with protaper files. 
                    J Endod  
                    2013; 
                    39
                    (1)
                    : 125-8.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref9">
            <journal_title>J. Clin. Exp. Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Marques-Ferreira M.</author>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <first_page>e56</first_page>
            <cYear>2017</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Marques-Ferreira M, Abrantes M, Ferreira HD, Caramelo F, Botelho MF, Carrilho EV. 
                    Sealing efficacy of system B versus Thermafil and Guttacore obturation techniques evidenced by scintigraphic analysis. 
                    J Clin Exp Dent  
                    2017; 
                    9
                    (1)
                    : e56-60.
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref10">
            <journal_title>J. Contemp. Dent. Pract.</journal_title>
            <author>Al-Kahtani A.M.</author>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <first_page>777</first_page>
            <cYear>2013</cYear>
            <doi>10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1402</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Al-Kahtani AM. 
                    Carrier-based root canal filling materials: A literature review. 
                    J Contemp Dent Pract  
                    2013; 
                    14
                    (4)
                    : 777-83.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref11">
            <journal_title>Int. Endod. J.</journal_title>
            <author>Pathomvanich S.</author>
            <volume>29</volume>
            <first_page>327</first_page>
            <cYear>1996</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01393.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Pathomvanich S, Edmunds DH. 
                    The sealing ability of Thermafil obturators assessed by four different microleakage techniques. 
                    Int Endod J  
                    1996; 
                    29
                    (5)
                    : 327-34.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref12">
            <journal_title>J. Endod.</journal_title>
            <author>Clark D.S.</author>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <first_page>4</first_page>
            <cYear>1993</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81032-0</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Clark DS, ElDeeb ME. 
                    Apical sealing ability of metal versus plastic carrier Thermafil obturators. 
                    J Endod  
                    1993; 
                    19
                    (1)
                    : 4-9.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref13">
            <journal_title>J Istanb Univ Fac Dent</journal_title>
            <author>Yilmaz A.</author>
            <volume>51</volume>
            <first_page>37</first_page>
            <cYear>2017</cYear>
            <doi>10.17096/jiufd.95769</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Yilmaz A, Karagoz-Kucukay I. 
                    
                        
                            In vitro
                         comparison of gutta-percha-filled area percentages in root canals instrumented and obturated with different techniques. 
                    J Istanb Univ Fac Dent  
                    2017; 
                    51
                    (2)
                    : 37-42.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref14">
            <journal_title>G. Ital. Endod.</journal_title>
            <author>Pasqualini D.</author>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <first_page>242</first_page>
            <cYear>2005</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Pasqualini D, Beccio R, Calabrese N, Cantatore G, Berutti E. 
                    
                        In vitro evaluation of the quality of gutta-percha apical sealer with different sizes of Thermafil obturators. 
                    G Ital Endod  
                    2005; 
                    19
                    : 242-6.
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref15">
            <journal_title>Fogorv. Sz.</journal_title>
            <author>Iványi I.</author>
            <volume>101</volume>
            <first_page>65</first_page>
            <cYear>2008</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Iványi I, Gyurkovics M, Várnagy E, Rosivall L, Fazekas A. 
                    Comparison of guttapercha points of different brands. 
                    Fogorv Sz  
                    2008; 
                    101
                    (2)
                    : 65-9.
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref16">
            <journal_title>Indian J. Dent. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Jindal D.</author>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <first_page>175</first_page>
            <cYear>2017</cYear>
            <doi>10.4103/0970-9290.207785</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Jindal D, Sharma M, Raisingani D, Swarnkar A, Pant M, Mathur R. 
                    Volumetric analysis of root filling with cold lateral compaction, Obtura II, Thermafil, and Calamus using spiral computerized tomography: An in vitro Study. 
                    Indian J Dent Res  
                    2017; 
                    28
                    (2)
                    : 175-80.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref17">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Investig.</journal_title>
            <author>Pirani C.</author>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Pirani C, Iacono F, Gatto MR, et al. 
                    Outcome of secondary root canal treatment filled with Thermafil: A 5-year follow-up of retrospective cohort study. 
                    Clin Oral Investig 
                    
                    
                 in press</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref18">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Samadi F.</author>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <first_page>1</first_page>
            <cYear>2014</cYear>
            <doi>10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1224</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Samadi F, Jaiswal J, Saha S, et al. 
                    A comparative evaluation of efficacy of different obturation techniques used in root canal treatment of anterior teeth: An in vitro study. 
                    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent  
                    2014; 
                    7
                    (1)
                    : 1-5.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref19">
            <journal_title>Aust. Endod. J.</journal_title>
            <author>De-Deus G.</author>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <first_page>55</first_page>
            <cYear>2007</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00047.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    De-Deus G, Maniglia-Ferreira CM, Gurgel-Filho ED, Paciornik S, Machado AC, Coutinho-Filho T. 
                    Comparison of the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area obtained by Thermafil and System B. 
                    Aust Endod J  
                    2007; 
                    33
                    (2)
                    : 55-61.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref20">
            <journal_title>Int. Endod. J.</journal_title>
            <author>Gencoglu N.</author>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <first_page>836</first_page>
            <cYear>2008</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01434.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Gencoglu N, Yildirim T, Garip Y, Karagenc B, Yilmaz H. 
                    Effectiveness of different gutta-percha techniques when filling experimental internal resorptive cavities. 
                    Int Endod J  
                    2008; 
                    41
                    (10)
                    : 836-42.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref21">
            <journal_title>J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Cervino G.</author>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <first_page>64</first_page>
            <cYear>2017</cYear>
            <doi>10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_521_16</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Spagnuolo G, et al. 
                    Interface between MTA and dental bonding agents: Scanning electron microscope evaluation. 
                    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent  
                    2017; 
                    7
                    (1)
                    : 64-8.
                    
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref22">
            <journal_title>Open Dent. J.</journal_title>
            <author>Simeone M.</author>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <first_page>229</first_page>
            <cYear>2014</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                    Simeone M, Santis RD, Ametrano G, et al. 
                    Temperature profiles along the root with gutta-percha warmed through diffrent heat sources. 
                    Open Dent J  
                    2014; 
                    8
                    : 229-35.
                    
                    
                </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
