TODENTJ-25-03-2019_TODENTJ-10-704
1553506893
Bentham Open
doi@benthamopen.net
Bentham Open
The Open Dentistry Journal
TODENTJ
1874-2106
12
26
2016
10
1
Cleaning Effectiveness of a Reciprocating Single-file and a Conventional Rotary Instrumentation System
Fredson Marcio Acris
de Carvalho
Leonardo Cantanhede de Oliveira
Gonçalves
André Augusto Franco
Marques
Vanessa
Alves
Carlos Eduardo da Silveira
Bueno
Alexandre Sigrist
De Martin
Objective:
To compare cleaning effectiveness by histological analysis of a reciprocating single-file system with ProTaper rotary instruments during the preparation of curved root canals in extracted teeth.
Methods:
A total of 40 root canals with curvatures ranging between 20 - 40 degrees were divided into two groups of 20 canals. Canals were prepared to the following apical sizes: Reciproc size 25 (n=20); ProTaper: F2 (n=20). The normal distribution of data was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the values obtained for the test (Mann-Whitney U test, P < .05) were statistically analyzed using the GraphPad InStat for the Mac OS software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results:
There were no significant differences in remaining debris (P > .05) between the two groups.
Conclusion:
The application of reciprocating motion during instrumentation did not result in increased debris when compared with continuous rotation motion, even in the apical part of curved canals. Both instruments resulted in debris in the canal lumen, irrespective of the movement kinematics applied.
12
26
2016
704
713
TODENTJ-10-704
1
10.2174/crossmark_policy
opendentistryjournal.com
benthamopen.com
true
Peer Reviewed
Single blind
Checked with iThenticate
2016-7-15
2016-9-14
2016-10-28
2016-12-26
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
10.2174/1874210601610010704
1553506893
https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/10/PAGE/704/
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-704/TODENTJ-10-704.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-704/TODENTJ-10-704.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-704/TODENTJ-10-704.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-704/TODENTJ-10-704.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-704/TODENTJ-10-704.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-704/TODENTJ-10-704.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-704/TODENTJ-10-704.pdf
-
https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-704/TODENTJ-10-704.xml
Int. Endod. J.
Bürklein S.
45
449
2012
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x
Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E.
Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Int Endod J
2012;
45
(5)
: 449-61.
Endod. Topics
Hülsmann M.
10
30
2005
10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x
Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM.
Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means.
Endod Topics
2005;
10
: 30-76.
Compend Contin Edu Dent.
Averbach RE
27
268
2006
Averbach RE, Kleier DJ.
Clinical update on root canal disinfection.
Compend Contin Edu Dent
2006;
27
(284)
: 268-9.
J. Endod.
Paqué F.
35
1056
2009
10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.020
Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters OA.
Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
J Endod
2009;
35
(7)
: 1056-9.
Int. Endod. J.
Fornari V.J.
43
988
2010
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01724.x
Fornari VJ, Silva-Sousa YT, Vanni JR, Pécora JD, Versiani MA, Sousa-Neto MD.
Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of increased apical enlargement for cleaning the apical third of curved canals.
Int Endod J
2010;
43
(11)
: 988-94.
Int. Endod. J.
Ahlquist M.
34
533
2001
10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00429.x
Ahlquist M, Henningsson O, Hultenby K, Ohlin J.
The effectiveness of manual and rotary techniques in the cleaning of root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Int Endod J
2001;
34
(7)
: 533-7.
Int. Endod. J.
Gambarini G.
35
422
2002
10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00495.x
Gambarini G, Laszkiewicz J.
A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments.
Int Endod J
2002;
35
(5)
: 422-7.
Int. Endod. J.
Foschi F.
37
832
2004
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00887.x
Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, et al.
SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Int Endod J
2004;
37
(12)
: 832-9.
Int. Endod. J.
Paqué F.
38
8
2005
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00889.x
Paqué F, Musch U, Hülsmann M.
Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Int Endod J
2005;
38
(1)
: 8-16.
J. Endod.
Shen Y.
32
61
2006
10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.017
Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B.
Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use.
J Endod
2006;
32
(1)
: 61-5.
J. Endod.
Roane J.B.
11
203
1985
10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80061-3
Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr.
The balanced force concept for instrumentation of curved canals.
J Endod
1985;
11
(5)
: 203-11.
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.
De-Deus G.
110
390
2010
10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.020
De-Deus G, Brandão MC, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel RA, Luna AS.
Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
2010;
110
(3)
: 390-4.
b
J. Endod.
Varela-Patiño P.
36
157
2010
10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.023
Varela-Patiño P, Ibañez-Párraga A, Rivas-Mundiña B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B.
Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life.
J Endod
2010;
36
(1)
: 157-9.
J. Endod.
Gavini G.
38
684
2012
10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.033
Gavini G, Caldeira CL, Akisue E, Candeiro GT, Kawakami DA.
Resistance to flexural fatigue of Reciproc R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement.
J Endod
2012;
38
(5)
: 684-7.
Int. Endod. J.
De-Deus G.
46
993
2013
10.1111/iej.12091
De-Deus G, Arruda TE, Souza EM, et al.
The ability of the Reciproc R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path.
Int Endod J
2013;
46
(10)
: 993-8.
J. Endod.
Kim H.C.
38
541
2012
10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.014
Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W.
Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne.
J Endod
2012;
38
(4)
: 541-4.
J. Endod.
Pedullà E.
39
258
2013
10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.025
Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E.
Continuous or reciprocating motion and NiTi rotary instruments.
J Endod
2013;
39
: 258-61.
Int. Endod. J.
Schäfer E.
39
203
2006
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01075.x
Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T.
Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Int Endod J
2006;
39
(3)
: 203-12.
Indian J. Dent. Res.
Kuzekanani M.
20
268
2009
10.4103/0970-9290.57355
Kuzekanani M, Walsh LJ, Yousefi MA.
Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs. ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
Indian J Dent Res
2009;
20
(3)
: 268-70.
Aust. Endod. J.
Vahid A.
35
93
2009
10.1111/j.1747-4477.2008.00135.x
Vahid A, Roohi N, Zayeri F.
A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length.
Aust Endod J
2009;
35
(2)
: 93-7.
J. Endod.
Machado M.E.
36
1238
2010
10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.012
Machado ME, Sapia LA, Cai S, Martins GH, Nabeshima CK.
Comparison of two rotary systems in root canal preparation regarding disinfection.
J Endod
2010;
36
(7)
: 1238-40.
J. Endod.
Yang G.
37
1412
2011
10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.024
Yang G, Yuan G, Yun X, Zhou X, Liu B, Wu H.
Effects of two nickel-titanium instrument systems, Mtwo versus ProTaper universal, on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
J Endod
2011;
37
(10)
: 1412-6.
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol.
Schneider S.W.
32
271
1971
10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
Schneider SW.
A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
1971;
32
(2)
: 271-5.
J. Endod.
Pruett J.P.
23
77
1997
10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80250-6
Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr.
Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
J Endod
1997;
23
(2)
: 77-85.
J. Endod.
Schäfer E.
28
211
2002
10.1097/00004770-200203000-00017
Schäfer E, Diez C, Hoppe W, Tepel J.
Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth.
J Endod
2002;
28
(3)
: 211-6.
Int. Endod. J.
39
921
2006
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x
Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology.
Int Endod J
2006;
39
(12)
: 921-30.
Int. Endod. J.
Yared G.
41
339
2008
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01351.x
Yared G.
Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations.
Int Endod J
2008;
41
(4)
: 339-44.
J. Endod.
You S.Y.
37
1296
2011
10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.021
You SY, Kim HC, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Lee W.
Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography.
J Endod
2011;
37
(9)
: 1296-300.
J. Endod.
De-Deus G.
36
1897
2010
10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.009
De-Deus G, Barino B, Zamolyi RQ, et al.
Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single-file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped canals.
J Endod
2010;
36
(11)
: 1897-900.
a
Dent. Clin. North Am.
Schilder H.
18
269
1974
Schilder H.
Cleaning and shaping the root canal.
Dent Clin North Am
1974;
18
(2)
: 269-96.
J. Appl. Oral Sci.
Marchesan M.A.
11
55
2003
10.1590/S1678-77572003000100010
Marchesan MA, Arruda MP, Silva-Sousa YT, Saquy PC, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD.
Morphometrical analysis of cleaning capacity using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation associated with irrigating solutions in mesio-distal flattened root canals.
J Appl Oral Sci
2003;
11
(1)
: 55-9.
Aust. Endod. J.
Gonçalves L.C.
36
1
2010
Gonçalves LC, Sponchiado-Junior EC, Marques AA, Frota MF, Garcia LF.
Morphometrical analysis of cleaning capacity of a hybrid instrumentation in mesial flattened root canals.
Aust Endod J
2010;
36
: 1-6.
J. Conserv. Dent.
da Frota M.F.
16
79
2013
10.4103/0972-0707.105305
da Frota MF, Filho IB, Berbert FL, Sponchiado EC Jr, Marques AA, Garcia LdaF.
Cleaning capacity promoted by motor-driven or manual instrumentation using ProTaper Universal system: Histological analysis.
J Conserv Dent
2013;
16
(1)
: 79-82.
Int. Endod. J.
Bürklein S.
39
945
2006
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01171.x
Bürklein S, Schäfer E.
The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Int Endod J
2006;
39
(12)
: 945-51.
Int. Endod. J.
Bürklein S.
44
447
2011
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01850.x
Bürklein S, Hiller C, Huda M, Schäfer E.
Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Int Endod J
2011;
44
(5)
: 447-57.
Int. Endod. J.
Gutmann J.L.
45
113
2012
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01957.x
Gutmann JL, Gao Y.
Alteration in the inherent metallic and surface properties of nickel-titanium root canal instruments to enhance performance, durability and safety: a focused review.
Int Endod J
2012;
45
(2)
: 113-28.
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.
Gambarini G.
105
798
2008
10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.017
Gambarini G, Gerosa R, De Luca M, Garala M, Testarelli L.
Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
2008;
105
(6)
: 798-800.
a
J. Endod.
Gambarini G.
34
1003
2008
10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007
Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al.
Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods.
J Endod
2008;
34
(8)
: 1003-5.
b
Minerva Stomatol.
Gambarini G.
57
393
2008
Gambarini G, Pongione G, Rizzo F, Testarelli L, Cavalleri G, Gerosa R.
Bending properties of nickel-titanium instruments: a comparative study.
Minerva Stomatol
2008;
57
(9)
: 393-8.
c
J. Endod.
Al-Hadlaq S.M.
36
305
2010
10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.032
Al-Hadlaq SM, Aljarbou FA, AlThumairy RI.
Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of M-wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
J Endod
2010;
36
(2)
: 305-7.
J. Endod.
Versiani M.A.
39
1060
2013
10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.009
Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L, et al.
Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems.
J Endod
2013;
39
(8)
: 1060-6.
J. Endod.
Williamson A.E.
35
95
2009
10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.004
Williamson AE, Cardon JW, Drake DR.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of monoculture biofilms of a clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis.
J Endod
2009;
35
(1)
: 95-7.
J. Endod.
Siqueira J.F.
39
1044
2013
10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.034
Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Versiani MA, et al.
Correlative bacteriologic and micro-computed tomographic analysis of mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by self-adjusting file, reciproc, and twisted file systems.
J Endod
2013;
39
(8)
: 1044-50.
Int. Endod. J.
Schäfer E.
37
239
2004
10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x
Schäfer E, Vlassis M.
Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Int Endod J
2004;
37
: 239-48.
J. Endod.
Haikel Y.
14
340
1988
10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80195-X
Haikel Y, Allemann C.
Effectiveness of four methods for preparing root canals: a scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
J Endod
1988;
14
(7)
: 340-5.
J. Endod.
Hülsmann M.
23
301
1997
10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80410-4
Hülsmann M, Rümmelin C, Schäfers F.
Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
J Endod
1997;
23
(5)
: 301-6.
Int. Endod. J.
Hülsmann M.
36
358
2003
10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00664.x
Hülsmann M, Gressmann G, Schäfers F.
A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Int Endod J
2003;
36
(5)
: 358-66.
Clin. Oral Investig.
Prati C.
8
102
2004
10.1007/s00784-004-0253-8
Prati C, Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S.
Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
Clin Oral Investig
2004;
8
(2)
: 102-10.
Endod. Topics
Haapasalo M.
10
77
2005
10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00135.x
Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM.
Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions.
Endod Topics
2005;
10
: 77-102.
Yared G.
Canal preparation with only one reciprocating instrument without prior hand filing: a new concept. Available at: http://www.vdw-reciproc.de/images/ stories/pdf/GY_Artikel_en_WEB.pdf
Accessed December 9, 2011.