<?xml version="1.0"?>
<doi_batch xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" xmlns:ct="http://www.crossref.org/clinicaltrials.xsd" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:rel="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" version="4.4.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0 crossref4.4.0.xsd">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>TODENTJ-25-03-2019_TODENTJ-10-680</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>1553506889</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>Bentham Open</depositor_name>
      <email_address>doi@benthamopen.net</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>Bentham Open</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata language="en">
        <full_title>The Open Dentistry Journal</full_title>
        <abbrev_title>TODENTJ</abbrev_title>
        <issn media_type="print">1874-2106</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>12</month>
          <day>09</day>
          <year>2016</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>10</volume>
        </journal_volume>
        <issue>1</issue>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
        <titles>
          <title>A One-year Follow-up Study of a Tapered Hydrophilic Implant Design Using Various Placement Protocols in the Maxilla</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first">
            <given_name>Jakob</given_name>
            <surname>Zwaan</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Leonardo</given_name>
            <surname>Vanden Bogaerde</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Herman</given_name>
            <surname>Sahlin</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Lars</given_name>
            <surname>Sennerby</surname>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Purpose:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>To study the clinical/radiographic outcomes and stability of a tapered implant design with a hydrophilic surface when placed in the maxilla using various protocols and followed for one year.</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Methods:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>Ninety-seven consecutive patients treated as part of daily routine in two clinics with 163 tapered implants in healed sites, in extraction sockets and together with bone augmentation procedures in the maxilla were evaluated after one year in function. Individual healing periods varying from 0 to 6 months had been used. Insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were made at baseline. Follow-up RFA registrations were made after 6 and 12 months of loading. The marginal bone levels were measured in intraoral radiographs from baseline and after 12 months. A reference group consisting of 163 consecutive straight maxillary implants was used for the comparison of baseline IT and RFA measurements.</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Results:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>Five implants failed before loading, giving an implant survival rate of 96.9% and a prosthesis survival rate of 99.4% after one year. The mean marginal bone loss after one year was 0.5 mm (SD 0.4). The mean IT was statistically significantly higher for tapered than for straight reference implants (41.3 ± 12.0 Ncm <jats:italic>vs</jats:italic> 33.6 ± 12.5 Ncm, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). The tapered implants showed a statistically insignificantly higher mean ISQ value than the straight references implants (73.7 ± 6.4 ISQ <jats:italic>vs</jats:italic> 72.2 ± 8.0 ISQ, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>=0.119). There was no correlation between IT and marginal bone loss. There was a correlation between IT and RFA measurements (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001).</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
                <jats:sec>
                    <jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title>
                    <jats:p>The tapered implant showed a high survival rate and minimal marginal bone loss after one year in function when using various protocols for placement. The tapered implant showed significantly higher insertion torque values than straight reference implants.</jats:p>
                </jats:sec>
            </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date>
          <month>12</month>
          <day>09</day>
          <year>2016</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>680</first_page>
          <last_page>691</last_page>
        </pages>
        <publisher_item>
          <identifier id_type="sici">TODENTJ-10-680</identifier>
        </publisher_item>
        <crossmark>
          <crossmark_version>1</crossmark_version>
          <crossmark_policy>10.2174/crossmark_policy</crossmark_policy>
          <crossmark_domains>
            <crossmark_domain>
              <domain>opendentistryjournal.com</domain>
            </crossmark_domain>
            <crossmark_domain>
              <domain>benthamopen.com</domain>
            </crossmark_domain>
          </crossmark_domains>
          <crossmark_domain_exclusive>true</crossmark_domain_exclusive>
          <custom_metadata>
            <assertion name="review_status" label="Review Status" group_name="peer_review_details" group_label="Peer Review Details" order="0">Peer Reviewed</assertion>
            <assertion name="review_process" label="Review Process" group_name="peer_review_details" group_label="Peer Review Details" order="1">Single blind</assertion>
            <assertion name="screening_status" label="Screening Status" group_name="plagiarism_screening" group_label="Plagiarism Screening" order="0">Checked with iThenticate</assertion>
            <assertion name="received" label="Received" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="0">2016-05-23</assertion>
            <assertion name="revised" label="Revised" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="1">2016-10-07</assertion>
            <assertion name="accepted" label="Accepted" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="2">2016-10-31</assertion>
            <assertion name="published" label="Published" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="3">2016-12-09</assertion>
            <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
              <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</ai:license_ref>
            </ai:program>
          </custom_metadata>
        </crossmark>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.2174/1874210601610010680</doi>
          <timestamp>1553506889</timestamp>
          <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/10/PAGE/680/</resource>
          <collection property="crawler-based">
            <item crawler="google">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-680/TODENTJ-10-680.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="msn">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-680/TODENTJ-10-680.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="altavista">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-680/TODENTJ-10-680.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="yahoo">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-680/TODENTJ-10-680.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="scirus">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-680/TODENTJ-10-680.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="iParadigms">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-680/TODENTJ-10-680.pdf</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
          <collection property="text-mining">
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-680/TODENTJ-10-680.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/xml">https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-680/TODENTJ-10-680.xml</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="ref1">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Oral Surg.</journal_title>
            <author>Adell R.</author>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <first_page>387</first_page>
            <cYear>1981</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. 
            A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. 
            Int J Oral Surg  
            1981; 
            10
            (6)
            : 387-416.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref2">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Åstrand P.</author>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <first_page>207</first_page>
            <cYear>2008</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Åstrand P, Ahlqvist J, Gunne J, Nilson H. 
            Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2008; 
            10
            (4)
            : 207-17.
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref3">
            <journal_title>Implant Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Jimbo R.</author>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <first_page>62</first_page>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <doi>10.1097/ID.0000000000000205</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Jimbo R, Albrektsson T. 
            Long-term clinical success of minimally and moderately rough oral implants: a review of 71 studies with 5 years or more of follow-up. 
            Implant Dent  
            2015; 
            24
            (1)
            : 62-9.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref4">
            <journal_title>Periodontol. 2000</journal_title>
            <author>De Bruyn H.</author>
            <volume>66</volume>
            <first_page>153</first_page>
            <cYear>2014</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/prd.12040</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            De Bruyn H, Raes S, Östman PO, Cosyn J. 
            Immediate loading in partially and completely edentulous jaws: a review of the literature with clinical guidelines. 
            Periodontol 2000  
            2014; 
            66
            (1)
            : 153-87.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref5">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Bassetti M.A.</author>
            <volume>27</volume>
            <first_page>310</first_page>
            <cYear>2016</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/clr.12537</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Bassetti MA, Bassetti RG, Bosshardt DD. 
            The alveolar ridge splitting/expansion technique: a systematic review. 
            Clin Oral Implants Res  
            2016; 
            27
            (3)
            : 310-24.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref6">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Corbella S.</author>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <first_page>120</first_page>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/cid.12077</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. 
            Long-term outcomes for the treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review of literature. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2015; 
            17
            (1)
            : 120-32.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref7">
            <journal_title>Eur. J. Oral Implantol</journal_title>
            <author>Al-Nawas B.</author>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <first_page>S219</first_page>
            <cYear>2014</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. 
            Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone - a systematic review and meta-analysis. 
            Eur J Oral Implantol  
            2014; 
            7
            (1)
            (Suppl. 2)
            : S219-34.
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref8">
            <journal_title>J. Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Chrcanovic B.R.</author>
            <volume>43</volume>
            <first_page>16</first_page>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2014.11.007</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. 
            Dental implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 
            J Dent  
            2015; 
            43
            (1)
            : 16-41.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref9">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</journal_title>
            <author>Wennerberg A.</author>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <first_page>63</first_page>
            <cYear>2010</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. 
            On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. 
            Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants  
            2010; 
            25
            (1)
            : 63-74.
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref10">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>OSullivan D.</author>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <first_page>85</first_page>
            <cYear>2000</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            OSullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. 
            Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2000; 
            2
            (2)
            : 85-92.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref11">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>OSullivan D.</author>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <first_page>474</first_page>
            <cYear>2004</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01041.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            OSullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. 
            Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. 
            Clin Oral Implants Res  
            2004; 
            15
            (4)
            : 474-80.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref12">
            <journal_title>Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal</journal_title>
            <author>Lozano-Carrascal N.</author>
            <volume>21</volume>
            <first_page>e214</first_page>
            <cYear>2016</cYear>
            <doi>10.4317/medoral.21024</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gilabert-Cerdà M, Farré-Pagés N, Gargallo-Albiol J, Hernández-Alfaro F. 
            Effect of implant macro-design on primary stability: A prospective clinical study. 
            Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal  
            2016; 
            21
            (2)
            : e214-21.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref13">
            <journal_title>J. Biomed. Mater. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Buser D.</author>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <first_page>889</first_page>
            <cYear>1991</cYear>
            <doi>10.1002/jbm.820250708</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. 
            Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. 
            J Biomed Mater Res  
            1991; 
            25
            (7)
            : 889-902.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref14">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Zechner W.</author>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <first_page>150</first_page>
            <cYear>2003</cYear>
            <doi>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Zechner W, Tangl S, Fürst G, et al. 
            Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. 
            Clin Oral Implants Res  
            2003; 
            14
            (2)
            : 150-7.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref15">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Burgos P.M.</author>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <first_page>181</first_page>
            <cYear>2008</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00074.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Burgos PM, Rasmusson L, Meirelles L, Sennerby L. 
            Early bone tissue responses to turned and oxidized implants in the rabbit tibia. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2008; 
            10
            (3)
            : 181-90.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref16">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Bogaerde L.V.</author>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <first_page>e83</first_page>
            <cYear>2010</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Bogaerde LV, Pedretti G, Sennerby L, Meredith N. 
            Immediate/Early function of Neoss implants placed in maxillas and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective case series study. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2010; 
            12
            (1)
            (Suppl. 1)
            : e83-94.
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref17">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Zumstein T.</author>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <first_page>480</first_page>
            <cYear>2012</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00286.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Zumstein T, Billström C, Sennerby L. 
            A 4- to 5-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study of Neoss implants placed with or without GBR procedures. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2012; 
            14
            (4)
            : 480-90.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref18">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Andersson P.</author>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <first_page>646</first_page>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/cid.12183</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Andersson P, Degasperi W, Verrocchi D, Sennerby L. 
            A Retrospective Study on Immediate Placement of Neoss Implants with Early Loading of Full-Arch Bridges. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2015; 
            17
            (4)
            : 646-57.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref19">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Zumstein T.</author>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Zumstein T, Sennerby LA. 
            1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study on Hydrophilic Dental Implants Placed with and without Bone Augmentation Procedures. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 
            2015.
            
            
         [Epub ahead of print]</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref20">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</journal_title>
            <author>Sennerby L.</author>
            <volume>30</volume>
            <first_page>564</first_page>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <doi>10.11607/jomi.3903</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Sennerby L, Pagliani L, Petersson A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Andersson P. 
            Two different implant designs and impact of related drilling protocols on primary stability in different bone densities: an in vitro comparison study. 
            Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants  
            2015; 
            30
            (3)
            : 564-8.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref21">
            <unstructured_citation>
            Lekholm U, Zarb GA. 
            
            Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, Eds. 
            Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry.  
            Chicago: Quintessence Publ Co Inc. 1985; pp. 
            
            
            199-209.
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref22">
            <journal_title>Eur. J. Oral Sci.</journal_title>
            <author>Esposito M.</author>
            <volume>106</volume>
            <first_page>527</first_page>
            <cYear>1998</cYear>
            <doi>10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. 
            Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. 
            Eur J Oral Sci  
            1998; 
            106
            (1)
            : 527-51.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref23">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Dahlin C.</author>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <first_page>303</first_page>
            <cYear>2013</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00356.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Dahlin C, Widmark G, Bergkvist G, Fürst B, Widbom T, Kashani H. 
            One-year results of a clinical and radiological prospective multicenter study on NEOSS® dental implants. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2013; 
            15
            (2)
            : 303-8.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref24">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Laurell L.</author>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <first_page>19</first_page>
            <cYear>2011</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00182.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Laurell L, Lundgren D. 
            Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2011; 
            13
            (1)
            : 19-28.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref25">
            <journal_title>J. Oral Rehabil.</journal_title>
            <author>Turkyilmaz I.</author>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <first_page>754</first_page>
            <cYear>2006</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01631.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Turkyilmaz I. 
            A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Brånemark system implants. 
            J Oral Rehabil  
            2006; 
            33
            (10)
            : 754-9.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref26">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.</journal_title>
            <author>Friberg B.</author>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <first_page>297</first_page>
            <cYear>1999</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80163-5</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. 
            A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. 
            Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg  
            1999; 
            28
            (4)
            : 297-303.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref27">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Östman P.O.</author>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <first_page>809</first_page>
            <cYear>2013</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00437.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Östman PO, Wennerberg A, Ekestubbe A, Albrektsson T. 
            Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite™ tapered implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2013; 
            15
            (6)
            : 809-18.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref28">
            <journal_title>Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal</journal_title>
            <author>Lozano-Carrascal N.</author>
            <volume>21</volume>
            <first_page>e214</first_page>
            <cYear>2016</cYear>
            <doi>10.4317/medoral.21024</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gilabert-Cerdà M, Farré-Pagés N, Gargallo-Albiol J, Hernández-Alfaro F. 
            Effect of implant macro-design on primary stability: A prospective clinical study. 
            Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal  
            2016; 
            21
            (2)
            : e214-21.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref29">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Kim S.J.</author>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <first_page>183</first_page>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/clr.12310</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Kim SJ, Ribeiro AL, Atlas AM, et al. 
            Resonance frequency analysis as a predictor of early implant failure in the partially edentulous posterior maxilla following immediate nonfunctional loading or delayed loading with single unit restorations. 
            Clin Oral Implants Res  
            2015; 
            26
            (2)
            : 183-90.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref30">
            <journal_title>Periodontol. 2000</journal_title>
            <author>Sennerby L.</author>
            <volume>47</volume>
            <first_page>51</first_page>
            <cYear>2008</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Sennerby L, Meredith N. 
            Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. 
            Periodontol 2000  
            2008; 
            47
            (1)
            : 51-66.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref31">
            <journal_title>J. Oral Rehabil.</journal_title>
            <author>Pagliani L.</author>
            <volume>40</volume>
            <first_page>221</first_page>
            <cYear>2013</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/joor.12024</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Pagliani L, Sennerby L, Petersson A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Andersson P. 
            The relationship between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and lateral displacement of dental implants: an in vitro study. 
            J Oral Rehabil  
            2013; 
            40
            (3)
            : 221-7.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref32">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Atieh M.A.</author>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <first_page>29</first_page>
            <cYear>2014</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/clr.12057</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, de Silva RK, Schwass DS, Duncan WJ. 
            The prognostic accuracy of resonance frequency analysis in predicting failure risk of immediately restored implants. 
            Clin Oral Implants Res  
            2014; 
            25
            (1)
            : 29-35.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref33">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Glauser R.</author>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <first_page>428</first_page>
            <cYear>2004</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Glauser R, Sennerby L, Meredith N, et al. 
            Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants. 
            Clin Oral Implants Res  
            2004; 
            15
            (4)
            : 428-34.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref34">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Vanden Bogaerde L.</author>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <first_page>S121</first_page>
            <cYear>2005</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00084.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Vanden Bogaerde L, Rangert B, Wendelhag I. 
            Immediate/early function of Brånemark System TiUnite implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective clinical study. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2005; 
            7
            (Suppl. 1)
            : S121-30.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref35">
            <journal_title>Implant Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Berardini M.</author>
            <volume>25</volume>
            <first_page>532</first_page>
            <cYear>2016</cYear>
            <doi>10.1097/ID.0000000000000422</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Berardini M, Trisi P, Sinjari B, Rutjes AW, Caputi S. 
            The effects of high insertion torque versus low insertion torque on marginal bone resorption and implant failure rates: a systematic review with meta-analyses. 
            Implant Dent  
            2016; 
            25
            (4)
            : 532-40.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref36">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Bornstein M.M.</author>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <first_page>338</first_page>
            <cYear>2009</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00148.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. 
            Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. 
            Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
            2009; 
            11
            (4)
            : 338-47.
            
            
            
        </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref37">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Dent.</journal_title>
            <author>Vanden Bogaerde L</author>
            <cYear>2016</cYear>
            <doi>10.1155/2016/8424931</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
            Vanden Bogaerde L, Sennerby L. 
            A randomized case-series study comparing the stability of implant with two different surfaces placed in fresh extraction sockets and immediately loaded. 
            Int J Dent 
            2016.
            
            
         2016: 8424931</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
