<?xml version="1.0"?>
<doi_batch xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" xmlns:ct="http://www.crossref.org/clinicaltrials.xsd" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:rel="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" version="4.4.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0 crossref4.4.0.xsd">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>TODENTJ-25-03-2019_TODENTJ-10-251</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>1553506493</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>Bentham Open</depositor_name>
      <email_address>doi@benthamopen.net</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>Bentham Open</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata language="en">
        <full_title>The Open Dentistry Journal</full_title>
        <abbrev_title>TODENTJ</abbrev_title>
        <issn media_type="print">1874-2106</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>05</month>
          <day>31</day>
          <year>2016</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>10</volume>
        </journal_volume>
        <issue>1</issue>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
        <titles>
          <title>Torque Loss After Miniscrew Placement: An In-Vitro Study Followed by a Clinical Trial</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first">
            <given_name>Marco</given_name>
            <surname>Migliorati</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Sara</given_name>
            <surname>Drago</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Fabrizio </given_name>
            <surname>Barberis</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Irene</given_name>
            <surname>Schiavetti</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Domenico</given_name>
            <surname>Dalessandri</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Stefano</given_name>
            <surname>Benedicenti</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
            <given_name>Armando Silvestrini </given_name>
            <surname>Biavati</surname>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract>
               <jats:p>To evaluate torque loss a week after insertion, both in an <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic> and an <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> experimental setup were designed. In the <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic> setup a total of 29 miniscrews were placed in 20 patients who underwent orthodontic treatment. Maximum insertion torque (MIT) was evaluated at insertion time (T1). A week later, insertion torque was measured again by applying a quarter turn (T2); no load was applied on the screw during the first week. In the <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> setup a total of 20 miniscrews were placed in pig rib bone samples. MIT was evaluated at insertion time (T1). Bone samples were kept in saline solution and controlled environment for a week during which the solution was refreshed every day. Afterwards, torque was measured again by applying a quarter turn (T2). The comparison of MIT over time was done calculating the percentage difference of the torque values between pre- and post-treatment and using the parametric two independent samples t-test or the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. After a week unloaded miniscrews showed a mean loss of rotational torque of 36.3% and 40.9% in <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> and in <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic> conditions, respectively. No statistical differences were found between the two different setups. Torque loss was observed after the first week in both study models; <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> experimental setup provided a reliable study model for studying torque variation during the first week after insertion.</jats:p>
            </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date>
          <month>05</month>
          <day>31</day>
          <year>2016</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>251</first_page>
          <last_page>260</last_page>
        </pages>
        <publisher_item>
          <identifier id_type="sici">TODENTJ-10-251</identifier>
        </publisher_item>
        <crossmark>
          <crossmark_version>1</crossmark_version>
          <crossmark_policy>10.2174/crossmark_policy</crossmark_policy>
          <crossmark_domains>
            <crossmark_domain>
              <domain>opendentistryjournal.com</domain>
            </crossmark_domain>
            <crossmark_domain>
              <domain>benthamopen.com</domain>
            </crossmark_domain>
          </crossmark_domains>
          <crossmark_domain_exclusive>true</crossmark_domain_exclusive>
          <custom_metadata>
            <assertion name="review_status" label="Review Status" group_name="peer_review_details" group_label="Peer Review Details" order="0">Peer Reviewed</assertion>
            <assertion name="review_process" label="Review Process" group_name="peer_review_details" group_label="Peer Review Details" order="1">Single blind</assertion>
            <assertion name="screening_status" label="Screening Status" group_name="plagiarism_screening" group_label="Plagiarism Screening" order="0">Checked with iThenticate</assertion>
            <assertion name="received" label="Received" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="0">2015-03-01</assertion>
            <assertion name="revised" label="Revised" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="1">2016-04-29</assertion>
            <assertion name="accepted" label="Accepted" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="2">2016-05-09</assertion>
            <assertion name="published" label="Published" group_name="publication_history" group_label="Publication History" order="3">2016-05-31</assertion>
            <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
              <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</ai:license_ref>
            </ai:program>
          </custom_metadata>
        </crossmark>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.2174/1874210601610010251</doi>
          <timestamp>1553506493</timestamp>
          <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/10/PAGE/251/</resource>
          <collection property="crawler-based">
            <item crawler="google">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-251/TODENTJ-10-251.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="msn">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-251/TODENTJ-10-251.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="altavista">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-251/TODENTJ-10-251.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="yahoo">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-251/TODENTJ-10-251.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="scirus">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-251/TODENTJ-10-251.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item crawler="iParadigms">
              <resource>https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-251/TODENTJ-10-251.pdf</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
          <collection property="text-mining">
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-251/TODENTJ-10-251.pdf</resource>
            </item>
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/xml">https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-251/TODENTJ-10-251.xml</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="refR1">
            <journal_title>J. Clin. Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Kanomi R.</author>
            <volume>31</volume>
            <first_page>763</first_page>
            <cYear>1997</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Kanomi R. 
                Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. 
                J Clin Orthod  
                1997; 
                31
                (11)
                : 763-7.
                
                               
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR2">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Adult Orthodon. Orthognath. Surg.</journal_title>
            <author>Costa A.</author>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <first_page>201</first_page>
            <cYear>1998</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. 
                Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. 
                Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg  
                1998; 
                13
                (3)
                : 201-9.
                
                             
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR3">
            <journal_title>J. Clin. Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Kyung H.M.</author>
            <volume>37</volume>
            <first_page>321</first_page>
            <cYear>2003</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Kyung HM, Park HS, Bae SM, Sung JH, Kim IB. 
                Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. 
                J Clin Orthod  
                2003; 
                37
                (6)
                : 321-8.
                
                          
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR4">
            <unstructured_citation>
                Sung JH, Kyung HM, Bae SM, Park HS, Kwon OW, McNamara J. 
                Microimplants in Orthodontics. 
                Daegu: Dentos Inc 2006.
                
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR5">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Mesa F.</author>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <first_page>196</first_page>
            <cYear>2008</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01450.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Mesa F, Muñoz R, Noguerol B, de Dios Luna J, Galindo P, O’Valle F. 
                Multivariate study of factors influencing primary dental implant stability. 
                Clin Oral Implants Res  
                2008; 
                19
                (2)
                : 196-200.
                
                              
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR6">
            <journal_title>Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.</journal_title>
            <author>Park H.S.</author>
            <volume>130</volume>
            <first_page>18</first_page>
            <cYear>2006</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. 
                Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. 
                Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop  
                2006; 
                130
                (1)
                : 18-25.
                
                                
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR7">
            <journal_title>Eur. J. Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Dalessandri D.</author>
            <volume>36</volume>
            <first_page>303</first_page>
            <cYear>2014</cYear>
            <doi>10.1093/ejo/cjt049</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Dalessandri D, Salgarello S, Dalessandri M, et al. 
                Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a meta-analysis (n &gt; 50). 
                Eur J Orthod  
                2014; 
                36
                (3)
                : 303-13.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR8">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</journal_title>
            <author>Su Y.Y.</author>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <first_page>647</first_page>
            <cYear>2009</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Su YY, Wilmes B, Hönscheid R, Drescher D. 
                Application of a wireless resonance frequency transducer to assess primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants: an in vitro study in pig ilia. 
                Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants  
                2009; 
                24
                (4)
                : 647-54.
                
                               
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR9">
            <journal_title>Angle Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Nienkemper M.</author>
            <volume>83</volume>
            <first_page>230</first_page>
            <cYear>2013</cYear>
            <doi>10.2319/043012-354.1</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Panayotidis A, et al. 
                Measurement of mini-implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. 
                Angle Orthod  
                2013; 
                83
                (2)
                : 230-8.
                
                              
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR10">
            <journal_title>Angle Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Nienkemper M.</author>
            <volume>84</volume>
            <first_page>127</first_page>
            <cYear>2014</cYear>
            <doi>10.2319/040813-271.1</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Pauls A, Drescher D. 
                Mini-implant stability at the initial healing period: a clinical pilot study. 
                Angle Orthod  
                2014; 
                84
                (1)
                : 127-33.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR11">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Abrahamsson I.</author>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <first_page>381</first_page>
            <cYear>2004</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. 
                Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. 
                Clin Oral Implants Res  
                2004; 
                15
                (4)
                : 381-92.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR12">
            <journal_title>J. Biomech.</journal_title>
            <author>Lakes R.S.</author>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <first_page>679</first_page>
            <cYear>1979</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/0021-9290(79)90017-4</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Lakes RS, Katz JL. 
                Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone--II. Relaxation mechanisms. 
                J Biomech  
                1979; 
                12
                (9)
                : 679-87.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR13">
            <journal_title>J. Biomech.</journal_title>
            <author>Guedes R.M.</author>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <first_page>49</first_page>
            <cYear>2006</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.005</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Guedes RM, Simões JA, Morais JL. 
                Viscoelastic behaviour and failure of bovine cancellous bone under constant strain rate. 
                J Biomech  
                2006; 
                39
                (1)
                : 49-60.
                
                  
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR14">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</journal_title>
            <author>Raghavendra S.</author>
            <volume>20</volume>
            <first_page>425</first_page>
            <cYear>2005</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. 
                Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. 
                Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants  
                2005; 
                20
                (3)
                : 425-31.
                
                               
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR15">
            <journal_title>Angle Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Shah A.H.</author>
            <volume>82</volume>
            <first_page>603</first_page>
            <cYear>2012</cYear>
            <doi>10.2319/070111-427.1</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Shah AH, Behrents RG, Kim KB, Kyung HM, Buschang PH. 
                Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength. 
                Angle Orthod  
                2012; 
                82
                (4)
                : 603-10.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR16">
            <journal_title>Eur. J. Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Migliorati M.</author>
            <volume>35</volume>
            <first_page>401</first_page>
            <cYear>2013</cYear>
            <doi>10.1093/ejo/cjr145</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Migliorati M, Benedicenti S, Signori A, et al. 
                Thread shape factor: evaluation of three different orthodontic miniscrews stability. 
                Eur J Orthod  
                2013; 
                35
                (3)
                : 401-5.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR17">
            <journal_title>Angle Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Lim S.A.</author>
            <volume>78</volume>
            <first_page>234</first_page>
            <cYear>2008</cYear>
            <doi>10.2319/121206-507.1</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Lim SA, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. 
                Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. 
                Angle Orthod  
                2008; 
                78
                (2)
                : 234-40.
                
                              
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR18">
            <journal_title>Angle Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Brinley C.L.</author>
            <volume>79</volume>
            <first_page>1156</first_page>
            <cYear>2009</cYear>
            <doi>10.2319/103108-554R.1</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Brinley CL, Behrents R, Kim KB, Condoor S, Kyung HM, Buschang PH. 
                Pitch and longitudinal fluting effects on the primary stability of miniscrew implants. 
                Angle Orthod  
                2009; 
                79
                (6)
                : 1156-61.
                
                                
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR19">
            <journal_title>Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.</journal_title>
            <author>Migliorati M.</author>
            <volume>142</volume>
            <first_page>228</first_page>
            <cYear>2012</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.029</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Migliorati M, Benedicenti S, Signori A, et al. 
                Miniscrew design and bone characteristics: an experimental study of primary stability. 
                Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop  
                2012; 
                142
                (2)
                : 228-34.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR20">
            <journal_title>Angle Orthod.</journal_title>
            <author>Wilmes B.</author>
            <volume>79</volume>
            <first_page>609</first_page>
            <cYear>2009</cYear>
            <doi>10.2319/071708-373.1</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Wilmes B, Drescher D. 
                Impact of insertion depth and predrilling diameter on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. 
                Angle Orthod  
                2009; 
                79
                (4)
                : 609-14.
                
                              
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR21">
            <journal_title>Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants</journal_title>
            <author>Su Y.Y.</author>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <first_page>404</first_page>
            <cYear>2009</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Su YY, Wilmes B, Hönscheid R, Drescher D. 
                Comparison of self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants: an animal study of insertion torque and displacement under lateral loading. 
                Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants  
                2009; 
                24
                (3)
                : 404-11.
                
                              
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR22">
            <journal_title>Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.</journal_title>
            <author>Lee N.K.</author>
            <volume>138</volume>
            <first_page>8.e1</first_page>
            <cYear>2010</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.019</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Lee NK, Baek SH. 
                Effects of the diameter and shape of orthodontic mini-implants on microdamage to the cortical bone. 
                Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop  
                2010; 
                138
                (1)
                : 8.e1-8.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR23">
            <journal_title>Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.</journal_title>
            <author>Barros S.E.</author>
            <volume>140</volume>
            <first_page>e181</first_page>
            <cYear>2011</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.016</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Barros SE, Janson G, Chiqueto K, Garib DG, Janson M. 
                Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy. 
                Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop  
                2011; 
                140
                (4)
                : e181-92.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR24">
            <journal_title>Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Hung E.</author>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <first_page>454</first_page>
            <cYear>2012</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00269.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Hung E, Oliver D, Kim KB, Kyung HM, Buschang PH. 
                Effects of pilot hole size and bone density on miniscrew implants’ stability. 
                Clin Implant Dent Relat Res  
                2012; 
                14
                (3)
                : 454-60.
                
                                
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR25">
            <journal_title>Acta Histochem.</journal_title>
            <author>Buffoli B.</author>
            <volume>116</volume>
            <first_page>898</first_page>
            <cYear>2014</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.acthis.2014.02.010</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Buffoli B, Dalessandri M, Favero G, et al. 
                AQP1 expression in human gingiva and its correlation with periodontal and peri-implant tissue alterations. 
                Acta Histochem  
                2014; 
                116
                (5)
                : 898-904.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR26">
            <journal_title>J. Oral Implantol.</journal_title>
            <author>Maiorana C.</author>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <first_page>e60</first_page>
            <cYear>2015</cYear>
            <doi>10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00206</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Maiorana C, Farronato D, Pieroni S, Cicciù M, Andreoni D, Santoro F. 
                A four-year survival rate multicenter prospective clinical study on 377 implants: correlations between implant insertion torque, diameter and bone quality. 
                J Oral Implantol  
                2015; 
                41
                (3)
                : e60-5.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR27">
            <journal_title>CDA J.</journal_title>
            <author>Roberts W.E.</author>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <first_page>54</first_page>
            <cYear>1987</cYear>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Roberts WE, Turley PK, Brezniak N, Fielder PJ. 
                Implants: Bone physiology and metabolism. 
                CDA J  
                1987; 
                15
                (10)
                : 54-61.
                
                            
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR28">
            <journal_title>Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.</journal_title>
            <author>Yadav S.</author>
            <volume>141</volume>
            <first_page>538</first_page>
            <cYear>2012</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.016</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Yadav S, Upadhyay M, Liu S, Roberts E, Neace WP, Nanda R. 
                Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: a randomized controlled trial. 
                Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop  
                2012; 
                141
                (5)
                : 538-46.
                
                               
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR29">
            <journal_title>Clin. Oral Implants Res.</journal_title>
            <author>Motoyoshi M.</author>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <first_page>109</first_page>
            <cYear>2006</cYear>
            <doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01211.x</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. 
                Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. 
                Clin Oral Implants Res  
                2006; 
                17
                (1)
                : 109-14.
                
                             
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="refR30">
            <journal_title>Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.</journal_title>
            <author>Meursinge Reynders R.A.</author>
            <volume>142</volume>
            <first_page>596</first_page>
            <cYear>2012</cYear>
            <doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.013</doi>
            <unstructured_citation>
                Meursinge Reynders RA, Ronchi L, Ladu L, van Etten-Jamaludin F, Bipat S. 
                Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. 
                Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop  
                2012; 
                142
                (5)
                : 596-614.e5.
                
                                
                
            </unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
