TODENTJ-25-03-2019_TODENTJ-10-131 1553506440 Bentham Open doi@benthamopen.net Bentham Open The Open Dentistry Journal TODENTJ 1874-2106 04 30 2016 10 1 Lorenzo Bevilacqua Matteo De Biasi Maria Giulia Lorenzon Costanza Frattini Daniele Angerame Background: Researchers have recently drawn attention to the analysis of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) for the implementation of the diagnosis of periodontal and peri-implant disease. Nevertheless, the measurements of volume and biomarkers concentration can be critically biased when data collected from studies with parallel group design are compared, given the technical difficulties, methodological variables, as well as the variability of crevicular fluid characteristics among different individuals. Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the GCF and PISF volumes in healthy and diseased sites belonging to the same patient. Method: Ten patients presenting a periodontally healthy tooth, a tooth with periodontitis, an implant with healthy peri-implant tissues and an implant with peri-implantitis were enrolled. Samples of GCF and PISF were collected from each site of interest and their volume measured with a Periotron 8000 device. Non-parametric statistical analysis was performed to test the significance of the differences in GCF and PISF volumes between i) sites of teeth and dental implants with the same condition of health or disease and ii) healthy and diseased sites of both teeth and dental implants subgroups. The correlation between probing pocket depth (PPD) and fluid production was also tested (p<0.05). Results: Healthy periodontal and peri-implant tissues produced comparable amounts of fluid that was significantly lower than in diseased sites (p<0.05). In the presence of diagnosed disease, the volumes of GCF and PISF were similar, too. The correlation between PPD and fluid production was significant only in healthy sites (PPD/GCF, ρ=0.890, p<0.001; PPD/PISF, ρ=0.810; p<0.005). Conclusion: The periodontal and peri-implant tissues behaved similarly in terms of fluid production in condition of both health and active disease. 04 30 2016 131 138 TODENTJ-10-131 1 10.2174/crossmark_policy opendentistryjournal.com benthamopen.com true Peer Reviewed Single blind Checked with iThenticate 2015-11-19 2016-02-6 2016-02-18 2016-04-30 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode 10.2174/1874210601610010131 1553506440 https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/10/PAGE/131/ https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-131/TODENTJ-10-131.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-131/TODENTJ-10-131.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-131/TODENTJ-10-131.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-131/TODENTJ-10-131.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-131/TODENTJ-10-131.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-131/TODENTJ-10-131.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-131/TODENTJ-10-131.pdf https://opendentistryjournal.com/contents/volumes/V10/TODENTJ-10-131/TODENTJ-10-131.xml Dent. Clin. North Am. Albandar J.M. 49 517 2005 10.1016/j.cden.2005.03.003 Albandar JM. Epidemiology and risk factors of periodontal diseases. Dent Clin North Am 2005; 49 (3) : 517-32. v-vi Inflammopharmacology Haynes D.R. 14 193 2006 10.1007/s10787-006-0006-1 Haynes DR. Emerging and future therapies for the treatment of bone loss associated with chronic inflammation. Inflammopharmacology 2006; 14 (5-6) : 193-7. J. Periodontol. 84 436 2013 10.1902/jop.2013.134001 Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a current understanding of their diagnoses and clinical implications. J Periodontol 2013; 84 (4) : 436-43. Periodontol. 2000 Mombelli A. 17 63 1998 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00124.x Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 1998; 17 : 63-76. J. Clin. Periodontol. Sanz M. 39 202 2012 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01837.x Sanz M, Chapple IL. Clinical research on peri-implant diseases: consensus report of Working Group 4 J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39 (Suppl. 12) : 202-6. J. Clin. Periodontol. Berglundh T. 38 188 2011 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01672.x Berglundh T, Zitzmann NU, Donati M. Are peri-implantitis lesions different from periodontitis lesions? J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38 (Suppl. 11) : 188-202. Periodontol. 2000 Armitage G.C. 34 109 2004 10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.003427.x Armitage GC. Analysis of gingival crevice fluid and risk of progression of periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 2004; 34 : 109-19. Acta Odontol. Scand. Brill N. 18 421 1960 10.3109/00016356009043875 Brill N. Gingival conditions related to flow of tissue fluid into gingival pockets. Acta Odontol Scand 1960; 18 : 421-46. Monogr. Oral Sci. Cimasoni G. 12 III 1983 Cimasoni G. Crevicular fluid updated. Monogr Oral Sci 1983; 12 : III-VII, 1-152. Periodontol. 2000 Armitage G.C. 7 39 1995 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1995.tb00035.x Armitage GC. Clinical evaluation of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 1995; 7 : 39-53. Periodontol. 2000 Barros S.P. 70 53 2016 10.1111/prd.12107 Barros SP, Williams R, Offenbacher S, Morelli T. Gingival crevicular fluid as a source of biomarkers for periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 2016; 70 (1) : 53-64. Eur. J. Dent. Ustün K. 1 236 2007 Ustün K, Alptekin NO. The effect of tobacco smoking on gingival crevicular fluid volume. Eur J Dent 2007; 1 (4) : 236-9. Stomatol. DDR Klinger G. 32 53 1982 Klinger G. Sulcus fluid flow rate in relation to hormonal influence. Stomatol DDR 1982; 32 (1) : 53-5. Eur. J. Orthod. Drummond S. 34 109 2012 10.1093/ejo/cjq172 Drummond S, Canavarro C, Perinetti G, Teles R, Capelli J Jr. The monitoring of gingival crevicular fluid volume during orthodontic treatment: a longitudinal randomized split-mouth study. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34 (1) : 109-13. Clin. Oral Implants Res. Lachmann S. 18 212 2007 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01322.x Lachmann S, Kimmerle-Müller E, Axmann D, Scheideler L, Weber H, Haas R. Associations between peri-implant crevicular fluid volume, concentrations of crevicular inflammatory mediators, and composite IL-1A -889 and IL-1B +3954 genotype. A cross-sectional study on implant recall patients with and without clinical signs of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18 (2) : 212-23. J. Periodontal Implant Sci. Bhardwaj S. 43 233 2013 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.5.233 Bhardwaj S, Prabhuji ML. Comparative volumetric and clinical evaluation of peri-implant sulcular fluid and gingival crevicular fluid. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013; 43 (5) : 233-42. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Tözüm T.F. 22 969 2007 Tözüm TF, Akman AC, Yamalik N, et al. Analysis of the inflammatory process around endosseous dental implants and natural teeth: myeloperoxidase level and nitric oxide metabolism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22 (6) : 969-79. J. Periodontal Res. Duarte P.M. 10.1111/jre.12354 Duarte PM, Serrão CR, Miranda TS, et al. Could cytokine levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid be used to distinguish between healthy implants and implants with peri-implantitis? A systematic review. J Periodontal Res J. Clin. Periodontol. Zitzmann N.U. 35 286 2008 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01274.x Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (8) (Suppl.) : 286-91. J. Clin. Periodontol. Ferreira S.D. 33 929 2006 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01001.x Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR, Costa JE, Costa FO. Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33 (12) : 929-35. Clin. Oral Implants Res. Eickholz P. 12 153 2001 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002153.x Eickholz P, Grotkamp FL, Steveling H, Mühling J, Staehle HJ. Reproducibility of peri-implant probing using a force-controlled probe. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12 (2) : 153-8. Braz. Oral Res. Andrade R. 26 57 2012 10.1590/S1806-83242012000100010 Andrade R, Espinoza M, Gómez EM, Espinoza JR, Cruz E. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26 (1) : 57-63. J. Periodontol. Atici K. 69 1155 1998 10.1902/jop.1998.69.10.1155 Atici K, Yamalik N, Eratalay K, Etikan I. Analysis of gingival crevicular fluid intracytoplasmic enzyme activity in patients with adult periodontitis and rapidly progressive periodontitis. A longitudinal study model with periodontal treatment. J Periodontol 1998; 69 (10) : 1155-63. Clin. Oral Implants Res. Hultin M. 13 349 2002 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130402.x Hultin M, Gustafsson A, Hallström H, Johansson LA, Ekfeldt A, Klinge B. Microbiological findings and host response in patients with peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13 (4) : 349-58. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Behneke A. 12 749 1997 Behneke A, Behneke N, d’Hoedt B, Wagner W. Hard and soft tissue reactions to ITI screw implants: 3-year longitudinal results of a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12 (6) : 749-57. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Boutros S.M. 11 322 1996 Boutros SM, Michalowicz BS, Smith QT, Aeppli DM. Crevicular fluid enzymes from endosseous dental implants and natural teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11 (3) : 322-30. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Niimi A. 10 434 1995 Niimi A, Ueda M. Crevicular fluid in the osseointegrated implant sulcus: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10 (4) : 434-6. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Salcetti J.M. 12 32 1997 Salcetti JM, Moriarty JD, Cooper LF, et al. The clinical, microbial, and host response characteristics of the failing implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12 (1) : 32-42. Clin. Oral Implants Res. Sakallıoğlu U. 22 706 2011 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02044.x Sakallıoğlu U, Lütfioğlu M, Sakallıoğlu EE, Sert S, Ceylan G. Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22 (7) : 706-10. Periodontol. 2000 Wassall R.R. 70 65 2016 10.1111/prd.12109 Wassall RR, Preshaw PM. Clinical and technical considerations in the analysis of gingival crevicular fluid. Periodontol 2000 2016; 70 (1) : 65-79. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Golubovic V. 16 349 2012 10.1007/s10006-012-0320-2 Golubovic V, Mihatovic I, Becker J, Schwarz F. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography to assess the configuration and extent of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects. A pilot study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 16 (4) : 349-54.